SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
So since it is never wrong, the Bible is 100% true.I see that you are trying for a job on the comedy circuit.
The Bible is 100% true!!!!
Except for where it is 100% wrong[waah wah sad trombone noise).
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So since it is never wrong, the Bible is 100% true.I see that you are trying for a job on the comedy circuit.
The Bible is 100% true!!!!
Except for where it is 100% wrong[waah wah sad trombone noise).
So since it is never wrong, the Bible is 100% true.
Nope. You only proved that you do not understand it quite often.I have already proved it.
Read the whole post.So since it is never wrong, the Bible is 100% true.
Of course I do.Nope. You only proved that you do not understand it quite often.
And you just confirmed that you do not understand the Bible.There is not 2 accounts of creation.
Nope, there is no magic stopping others from not understanding the Bible. You make the mistake of trying to put your own spin on it so you make endless error after error. It is quite humorous at times. Do you remember your utter failure when it came to the Census of Quirinius?Of course I do.
You as an unbeliever cannot.
Reading the Bible from cover to cover was one of the things that made me an atheist.You would be surprised by how many Christians actually haven't read the Bible.
Then how come you don't know what they're talking about?
Can you meet the challenge?
I assume that you'll be making an exception to allow for the assumption that all reasonable assumptions can be assumed to be false if they yield any evidence that refutes the assumption that the earth is only 6000 years old.NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.
But no one has met the challenge.I assume that you'll be making an exception to allow for the assumption that all reasonable assumptions can be assumed to be false if they yield any evidence that refutes the assumption that the earth is only 6000 years old.
Which one? Everything you've posted has been addressed and you've been shown to be wrong...But no one has met the challenge.
Of course not.But no one has met the challenge.
Everyone and their aunt met your silly challenge. You admitted it multiple times by running away when they tried to explain your error to you.But no one has met the challenge.
No one nor their aunt or uncle has met the challenge.Everyone and their aunt met your silly challenge. You admitted it multiple times by running away when they tried to explain your error to you.
Go right ahead.Try if you like.
What challenge?Go right ahead.
Let us see if YOU can meet your challenge.
Remember, NO ASSUMPTIONS.