Challenge for those that believe in billions of years for the age of things. Give anything that is more than 6000 years old. NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.

[SavedByTheLord]

And I acknowledged that you do not know which 1789 version you are using.
With all the different versions of the King James Bible, you are going to have to more specific as to which one is the one God Produced.

Or do you believe that God made errors that needed to be corrected in the one He produced?

King James Bible 1789

www.originalbibles.com

The multiple version con job is tried now and then.
But they make no sense.
Which of the multiple stories for the first living creature do you believe?

 

[Jimmy]

What’s so funny @Darkstorn

 

[Darkstorn]

What’s so funny @Darkstorn

This isn't really a chat or such and I refuse to engage with people like you.

But I found your comment funny. And now you're on the ignore list.

 

[McBell]

King James Bible 1789

www.originalbibles.com

The multiple version con job is tried now and then.
But they make no sense.
Which of the multiple stories for the first living creature do you believe?

I will not be answering your questions until you start answering mine.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

I will not be answering your questions until you start answering mine.

You have not answered anything.

What was the first living creature?
How did feathers evolve?

 

[McBell]

King James Bible 1789

www.originalbibles.com

The multiple version con job is tried now and then.
But they make no sense.
Which of the multiple stories for the first living creature do you believe?

Is that the actual one you use or are you just copy pasting the first google result?

Now if you had read the words in the link you provided you would know that one is after the Blayney edition.
How, because it flat out state as such.....

 

[McBell]

You have not answered anything.

What was the first living creature?
How did feathers evolve?

Is it that you do not understand what is written, that you are not actually reading what is written, something else?

Of course I did not answer you.
I even flat out stated as much in the very post you replied that I will not answer you until you start answering me.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Is that the actual one you use or are you just copy pasting the first google result?

Now if you had read the words in the link you provided you would know that one is after the Blayney edition.
How, because it flat out state as such.....

I use bible gateway.
So what?

Show all differences between all King James Bible versions.

What was the first living creature?
How did feathers evolve?

 

[McBell]

I use bible gateway.
So what?

Show all differences between all King James Bible versions.

What was the first living creature?
How did feathers evolve?

You did not link to Bible gateway, you linked to a PDF file of an after the Blayney edition1789 version of the King James Bible.
So you have absolutely no clue which version of the King James Bible you are using outside what you think Bible Gateway is telling you.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

You did not link to Bible gateway, you linked to a PDF file of an after the Blayney edition1789 version of the King James Bible.
So you have absolutely no clue which version of the King James Bible you are using outside what you think Bible Gateway is telling you.

For the print version I use I pointer to the 1789 version.

Show all differences between all King James Bible versions.

What was the first living creature?
How did feathers evolve?

 

[Subduction Zone]

You have not answered anything.

What was the first living creature?
How did feathers evolve?

I already answered that one for you.

 

[McBell]

Show all differences between all King James Bible versions.

For you to ignore/dismiss:

The Editions | The King James Bible: A Translation for the Ages | Cedarville University

digitalcommons.cedarville.edu

 

[SavedByTheLord]

I already answered that one for you.

Not the feathers and not anything real for the first creature.

 

[Jimmy]

This isn't really a chat or such and I refuse to engage with people like you.

But I found your comment funny. And now you're on the ignore list.

Okee dokee, cool

 

[Subduction Zone]

Not the feathers and not anything real for the first creature.

For the feathers yes. For the first creature, how would you know?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

For the feathers yes. For the first creature, how would you know?

Feathers could never have developed through evolution. Way too intricate.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Feathers could never have developed through evolution. Way too intricate.

Oh really? You just made a positive assertation taking on the burden of proof.

Prove your claim, or is just another falsehood of yours that you will run away from?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Oh really? You just made a positive assertation taking on the burden of proof.

Prove your claim, or is just another falsehood of yours that you will run away from?

Then you know nothing about flight, feathers, sexual reproduction, or evolution.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Then you know nothing about flight, feathers, sexual reproduction, or evolution.

On the contrary. But you made the claim. You need to support it. You could ask politely and I would tell you what I know and how I know it, but you have a duty to do first.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

On the contrary. But you made the claim. You need to support it. You could ask politely and I would tell you what I know and how I know it, but you have a duty to do first.

Evolutionists never can defend the indefensible?