-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Challenge for those that believe in billions of years for the age of things. Give anything that is more than 6000 years old. NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
That is just the same empty claim.
Jimmy
King Phenomenon
You love people like me
It's impossible, but here is how it would have had to happen.
I don't think people are having any trouble keeping up with you. You just keep repeating the same things over and over.
It makes you wonder
That is a good question. The claim that you "need to keep up better" indicates you are keeping up, but not in some way that doesn't leave room for some sort of improvement. Perhaps a funny walk is required to keep up better. Maybe you need rose-colored glasses. Or to ignore logic and reason. I'm going with the funny walk.
Maybe there is an app for that.
It makes me wonder about the state of education in this country. It makes me wonder how a person can claim to know more than scientists without seeming to know science. It makes me wonder about a lot of things.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I was hoping for some extra "u"s or an "re" instead of an "er" that would indicate another country of origin. No such luck.
We dominate in this field. International creationists even come to the US in order to make money denying science That's how @John53 has been cleaning house in Australia. Go to America he says. You'll get rich Ray. You too Ken.
It was a 2 for 1 deal, I swapped them for my wife and threw in Murdoch as a bonus because Ray Comfort is a Kiwi and I didn't want to short change you.
I thought he was Australian. I swear I saw him putting shrimp on the barbie. My apologies for the error. Thanks for throwing in Murdoch. That really sweetened the deal for us.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Well, I have covered a lot of topics and you do not seem to be able to keep up.
What was the first living creature?
How did feathers evolve?
McBell
Unbound
Already answered
By multiple people in multiple threads
Already answered
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Well here are the real issues with the mythical first creature.
what was the first living creature?
How did it handle osmosis and diffusion?
This is more than just water. There are many other ions whose flow and concentration must be tightly controlled.
what was controlling the gating of these functions and what transport was used?
How did it replenish its chemical energy stores?
How did it replicate?
How did it prevent many copying errors?
How did it assemble all these amino acids into large sequences?
How did it do these things while protecting itself?
You see why this destroys the myth of abiogenesis.
No. I've had no trouble following the single track you are on and all the tactics you having been using. You basically repeat the same things over and over, don't listen to anyone and regularly declare victory without reason. That pretty much is a spot on summary of your entire effort here.
No one seems to be missing what you are failing to do.
Why do you think AIG promotes false information? Is it the enemy in disguise fooling people that don't understand science?
Don't you know? You claim to know science better than scientists.
Did you know that the theory of evolution cannot simultaneously be not a theory of evolution? So it stands according to the law of noncontradiction.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
I am just curious,
What caused the Big Bang?
What was there before the Big Bang?
Where did all the orderly laws of nature come from?
What was the first living creature?
How did it handle osmosis and diffusion?
This is more than just water. There are many other ions whose flow and concentration must be tightly controlled.
What was controlling the gating of these functions and what transport was used?
How did it replenish its chemical energy stores?
How did it replicate?
How did it prevent many copying errors?
How did it assemble all these amino acids into large sequences?
Where did it get its supply of amino acids?
How did it do these things while protecting itself?
Where did it come into being?
When did this occur?
What was the protective layer made of?
About how many atoms was it made of?
How did it repair itself?
Where did it get its supply of amino acids?
How were these moved into the creature?
Could it move around?
I read that Darwin attended a seance? Did he get some of his delusions from devils?
I read that Marx wanted to see the blood of 100s of millions shed and he wanted to dedicated The Communist Manifesto to Darwin.
Now Marx promoted Communism and Socialism which lead to Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot.
Did you know that God warned about seances with lying spirits?
I see. If people on the internet cannot answer these questions, then you think you have proven something. And you will run with that as proof that abiogenesis is refuted. Your logic is astounding.
I can't answer questions about organ transplants or the construction of nuclear power plants. I bet there aren't very many on here that can. By the logic you are trying to use, those thing are proven false.
Not that you will see the wisdom of this. Finding facts, rational discussion and coming to an understanding don't seem to be the interest of what you are up to.
No, there is no difficulty keeping up with what you are doing.
You may well be curious, but that isn't what you are using these questions to resolve and claim here.
You should stop posing them as if you know something and start doing research. Times a wastin'.