Do you think that a Christian should use the best information available to come to the best conclusions or just dismiss the evidence and go with unverified and dubious claims that promote the belief, but not the facts?I am just curious,
What caused the Big Bang?
What was there before the Big Bang?
Where did all the orderly laws of nature come from?
What was the first living creature?
How did it handle osmosis and diffusion?
This is more than just water. There are many other ions whose flow and concentration must be tightly controlled.
What was controlling the gating of these functions and what transport was used?
How did it replenish its chemical energy stores?
How did it replicate?
How did it prevent many copying errors?
How did it assemble all these amino acids into large sequences?
Where did it get its supply of amino acids?
How did it do these things while protecting itself?
Where did it come into being?
When did this occur?
What was the protective layer made of?
About how many atoms was it made of?
How did it repair itself?
Where did it get its supply of amino acids?
How were these moved into the creature?
Could it move around?
I read that Darwin attended a seance? Did he get some of his delusions from devils?
I read that Marx wanted to see the blood of 100s of millions shed and he wanted to dedicated The Communist Manifesto to Darwin.
Now Marx promoted Communism and Socialism which lead to Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot.
Did you know that God warned about seances with lying spirits?
How is that consistent with Christian values?
If your sources are not scientific and you knowingly use them as if there were, what is that called?
If you routinely make claims and try to browbeat others into supporting those claims without supporting them yourself, do you think that promotes credibility.
What is pretending to know things you don't?
Does the Bible promote false advertising?
Is it OK to lie for God?
Should arguments and support be logical or based on logical fallacies?
I'm curious too.