Charlie Hebdo to attack Muslims again

[ChristineM]

They'll probably do mostly anything for a franc or two. Maybe their sales were slipping.

Trouble is, in France their sales may well increase for printing such muck.

Have you read it? Its actually quite cerebral in a private eye sort of way,

And thats euro. Francs went the way of the dodo nearly 20 years ago

 

[oldbadger]

Have you read it? Its actually quite cerebral in a private eye sort of way,

Private Eye? That's been nailed in Court cases so many times .......
But 'no', I ain't never read it.

And thats euro. Francs went the way of the dodo nearly 20 years ago

Yeah.... I know! I was going to write 'They'd do anything for a quick buck' and then thought........'Nah..... that'll have to be a franc'.

Look......... it don't sound right..... where's the ring to:-
'Wot? Them? They'd do anything for a quick euro!'
Almost sounds.... well, porny! .

 

[ecco]

The one who do killing, yes of course they must really study more, 99% of Muslims are not like them, example is my girlfriend who is a Sunni Muslim, she does not wish to harm or do bad to others or her self.

Your girlfriend. What about you?

And I am against caricature of Muhammad

It is said that drawing of Muhammad or Allah should not be done.

Why? Who said that? Is that in the Koran? Is that something that Mohammed allegedly wrote?

I do not advocate that Islam should be everywhere, I say it is to much hate toward Muslims in today's world. The hate should be toward the terrorists, not the common Muslim.

If 99% of Muslims are against violence, why didn't 99% of Muslims come out against the bombings of the magazine's offices?

If you are one of the 99% of Muslims who are against violence, did you come out against the bombings of the magazine's offices?

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

Islam say portrait of the prophet is not right to do, what is weak about following the teaching?

It is not right for MUSLIMS to do. But why should anybody else be forced to behave as if they were Muslims, when they are not? To be a Christian, for example, means believing that Mohammed was NOT God's last Prophet. Should they alter their belief? And in return, will Muslims agree that Jesus is the Son of God, and divine?

There are Jews who think it is not right to "cut the corners of their beards." Out of respect, should the rest of the world avoid doing that? Or should those Jews do whatever the heck the like, and allow everybody else to do the same?

So why should Charlie Hebdo not portray Mohammed, who they do not believe to "the Prophet?"

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

How about showing respect for the Muslim people, even we are not Muslims?

I ask again -- does "showing respect" for someone mean that you have to behave as they believe? Then why don't Muslims have to show respect for their Hindu neighbours in Asia?

 

[ChristineM]

Private Eye? That's been nailed in Court cases so many times .......
But 'no', I ain't never read it.


Yeah.... I know! I was going to write 'They'd do anything for a quick buck' and then thought........'Nah..... that'll have to be a franc'.

Look......... it don't sound right..... where's the ring to:-
'Wot? Them? They'd do anything for a quick euro!'
Almost sounds.... well, porny! .

Or maybe they are remembering those who died of callous terorism while working in a free country, not governed by religious terrorists

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

This is not about what a few Muslims has done, this thread is about Charlie he do and their drawings

Amanaki, would you, then, say that it is always wrong, forever and everywhere, for anybody to make a drawing, statue, portrait or whatever of anybody or anything, if some religion doesn't think it should be done? Will you ban all art, all cartoons, all pictorial representation?

 

[FearGod]

When will this ****ty "satire" magazine stop harasment of the Prophet Muhammad?
Again they are planning to re publication of the idiotic drawings from 2015. Did they not learn anything last time?

The easy way to be famous, they realized that many people hate Muslims and hence
presenting a work against Muslims will let them famous.

Why they don't offend Moses or Abraham the way they do with Muhammad?

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

I'm a big fan of offending others, & highly skilled in the art.
Heaven forbid that Islamic theocratic influence take hold in any
western country. I'd be among the first on the chopping block.

Wait a second ... that may be incentive enough....

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

I have never said you or other have to follow Islamic teaching, but I do not understand why people can not respect that Muslims should not create picture of Muhammad, you do not need to follow a teaching to show respect to what it say.

Actually, Amanaki, that is exactly what you are saying. You are suggesting that Muslims are right in seeking to punish non-Muslims for doing what Muslims would not -- drawing representations of the Prophet.

 

[Milton Platt]

When will this ****ty "satire" magazine stop harasment of the Prophet Muhammad?
Again they are planning to re publication of the idiotic drawings from 2015. Did they not learn anything last time?

Muhammad is dead...he cannot be harassed.

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

Islamic law is for Muslims yes, as far as I know anyway. But my question is, why bring that horrendous drawing back now?

Because 12 people died for that cartoon.

Publishing it says to the world that they refuse to be intimidated by violence.

Why can they not leave it?

Why shouldn't they be intimidated by violence, you mean?

Has not the world seen enough Islamophobic actions?

Why do you consider it Islamophobic?

 

[Father Heathen]

Christianity suffers worse by far

Pffffffft! How so?

 

[stvdv]

That doesn't sound like a whole lotta luvin'.

And there are lots more luvin verses to keep the good Christian happy

An astounding 2% of the Bible verses are violent crap

I use common sense and only use loving verses (so I use maybe 2 verses from the Bible; that's plenty for me, no need to know more). I think it is even unwise to read the violent verses, as it might infect you with crap thoughts, how else they...

Interesting and useful poll would be 'How many':
1) Christians read violent verses
2) Christians believe Bible violence can be used, as it is God's word
3) Christians promote violent verses
4) Christians believe those are God's violent words
5) Christians think it's still applicable/useful now
*) And do the same to Muslims/Koran

I think in percentage it might be similar, low
I think in real numbers there will be a difference

 

[Spirit of Light]

Muhammad is dead...he cannot be harassed.

That is no excuse for what the caricature is a symbol of. It is symbol of intolerance toward Islam.

 

[Spirit of Light]

Because 12 people died for that cartoon.

Publishing it says to the world that they refuse to be intimidated by violence.


Why shouldn't they be intimidated by violence, you mean?


Why do you consider it Islamophobic?

It is disrespect for Islam.
And no I do of course not support any Muslim doing wrongdoing to others.

 

[Spirit of Light]

It is not right for MUSLIMS to do. But why should anybody else be forced to behave as if they were Muslims, when they are not? To be a Christian, for example, means believing that Mohammed was NOT God's last Prophet. Should they alter their belief? And in return, will Muslims agree that Jesus is the Son of God, and divine?

There are Jews who think it is not right to "cut the corners of their beards." Out of respect, should the rest of the world avoid doing that? Or should those Jews do whatever the heck the like, and allow everybody else to do the same?

So why should Charlie Hebdo not portray Mohammed, who they do not believe to "the Prophet?"

Because by making that caricature and now making it come forth again, does not lead to any good. It only lead to more turmoil.

 

[oldbadger]

Or maybe they are remembering those who died of callous terorism while working in a free country, not governed by religious terrorists

Or maybe they're winding up the country towards serious trouble. It's provocative, it's a deliberate act to upset a minority and increase unrest, imo.

You know that wouldn't be allowed where I live. It's filthy.

 

[Spirit of Light]

Actually, Amanaki, that is exactly what you are saying. You are suggesting that Muslims are right in seeking to punish non-Muslims for doing what Muslims would not -- drawing representations of the Prophet.

Again, not that is not what I say, this world has many religions and we are free to believe any of those religions, or none of them.
Muslims can "punish" them self for not being righteous and following the Islamic law. But they can not and should not inflict that on none Muslims. Does it happens? Yes unfortunately it does, but it is not a correct way to do it.

A Muslim, as any other religious person will try to spread the teaching, but if you say no to it that is ok too.

 

[McBell]

Because by making that caricature and now making it come forth again, does not lead to any good. It only lead to more turmoil.

and here once again you appear to be claiming that we should all bow down to insecure bullies.
One wonders why you are unable to get away from that?