Trailblazer
Veteran Member
Show me the verses in the NT has the name "Jesus" implied or even stated as the one returning. It is assumed by Christians, not implied in the text, but show me some of those verses and I will explain why they do not apply to Jesus returning.Trailblazer said: The Bible is not the only Book of God.
Baha'u'llah did not claim to be Christ, He claimed to be the return of the Christ Spirit in another man.
There is nothing you can do to change history or God's Will. It's been done.
Jesus is not coming back to earth, EVER.
That's the problem. The NT has the name "Jesus" implied or maybe even stated as the one returning. They say things like when the "Lord" returns, or use the word "Christ", the "Lamb", the "Lion of Judah" and so on. For Christians, all these other names and titles refer to Jesus. And sorry, but it does seem like Baha'is have to turn and twist things to make them refer to their prophet. Plus, I mentioned this a few times, the very next coming of "Christ", "The Anointed One" would have been Muhammad. And I really don't see adequate prophecies that point to Muhammad.
When they say things like “when the "Lord" returns” that definitely applies to Baha’u’llah, who was the Glory of the Lord. It is smattered all throughout the OT. Jesus came in the station of the Son, Baha’u’llah came in the station of the Father.
There are some verses that refer to Muhammad but I am no Bible expert.