Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
FH... We both know that totally depends on what level they are and whether or not they chose the baptism skill tree or evangelism skill tree
self becoming....is manipulation
it is shining the UV torch and demanding that you grow
instead of letting the sunshine make you grow
magic is the man who builds a greenhouse
mysticism is the man who lets the tomatoes grow
the fundamental difference being the magician uses outside forces harmoniously or antagonisticly
the mystic is those outside forces and uses nothing
but you're perspective is LHP, so I'm talking donkey poop
Yeah, sure. totally ridiculous. whatever.
And what if there is no sunshine?
If you just sit and wait for things to grow on their own without an area to grow or seeds planted... you are basically saying that you are just leaving it up to whatever to make the things grow.
This is interesting...
soooo..... LHP/magic manipulates to bring about change you say... in which it damages and when it tries to possess it loses it's grasp or whatever, and with mysticism there is no manipulation cause you... become the seed which grows, or become the sun that shines? So then you don't have to do anything because you are what it is that is doing the doing...
What??!!!
Where can I go to understand this "mysticism?" Any good links or reads?
So far I am understanding magic as UV pretty much. It IS NOT will-power being exercised! Yes, self-becoming/ self-evolution is a form of manipulation. It is manipulating yourself to become a better person though. It is proactive. That is how I see it, it is using your hands and doing what needs to be done. I also understand magic to be an inexact science with a lack of lust for result. So.... it's not supposed to be a power trip, even though it is the acquisition of power you are after. It has lots of paradoxes.
ha ha donkey poop ha... donkey poop frubals coming your way
Mr. Cheese I dunno about Hermeticism, but you are right, Aten isn't literally the sun. The sun is a symbol. Aten is actually a form of Ra, and seen as one of the creator gods.
I gotta admit, that's the funniest thing you said the entire post. LOL
Magic, Christian or otherwise is about psychology. Sugar pills for the soul. Another way to get closer to the One.
Spelling is unimportant.No.. It's because there's nothing to agree on. No one has even agreed on how to spell it, let alone what it is. So far, I understand that it's "the way of the universe"? Are you kidding me? Vague much...?
There is a difference between voicing your opinion on something is you disagree with it, and ridiculing and making fun of it. If you can post your opinions with degrading what those who believe in Magic(k) think thin go ahead.Oh that's right... because I shouldn't be allowed to voice my opinion. I guess I should also stay out of any other thread where I disagree with the OP'er. I guess I'll head over to the "things we all agree on" thread...
You assume. I'm not stomping off. But rather leaving because I am tired of being put down. There is a reason why I don't post much about this topic in open forums, it because of people that will take it to poke fun of the people who believe.Yeah... very adult. Stomp your feet and leave the room because someone disagrees with you.
so many "fluffy bunny" as they are called, authors and practioners often think....
much IS psychology....
but magic is actually far more....
But rather leaving because I am tired of being put down. There is a reason why I don't post much about this topic in open forums, it because of people that will take it to poke fun of the people who believe.
Magic, Christian or otherwise is about psychology. Sugar pills for the soul. Another way to get closer to the One.
True, it is far more but at it's core it is still psychology, a psychology of the soul. The One needs no elaborate rituals or teachings, tough some are so entrenched in life that they need grand ideas and patterns to make sense of it.
.
Except that's not what happens. Misrepresentation is a poor substitute for argument.I believe he is referring to the magic involved when a mortal priest uses a magical process and converts thin wafers into the body of Jesus and turns watered down wine into the blood of Jesus.
well indeed the purpose of ritual is to not have ritual
but ritualists would argue you have to do ritual in order to not have ritual...
magic ritual of course is differentiated in many ways form common use of the word ritual in that it employs ritual pattern making.... a creation of a matrix within which things can be created.... by using patterns...
of course you could argue its all hogwash....and there is no such thing as magic
as everythign to be found within magic, angels, chthonic beings, access to higher realms, HGAs etc etc etc etc ...are already there...
but thats where magic ends and mysticism begins...as wg greay stated, magic "feels the need" to meddle.... and that is its stance..be it "white, gray, babbon, candle blood or black" magic.....
I also understand it is virtually impossible to have a serious conversation about this topic here.... simply because the hecklers really have no idea.
Spelling is unimportant.
There is a difference between voicing your opinion on something is you disagree with it, and ridiculing and making fun of it. If you can post your opinions with degrading what those who believe in Magic(k) think thin go ahead.
You assume. I'm not stomping off. But rather leaving because I am tired of being put down. There is a reason why I don't post much about this topic in open forums, it because of people that will take it to poke fun of the people who believe.
no...by invisible forces I mean angels, gods, chthonic beings etc
this is what makes nipple tweaking different to other "forms of magic"
a mystic seeks more than mere understanding....
and yes thigns can be defined....
each to their own..is fine
but any magician worth their salt knows magic is not mysticsm
and vice versa
Here is one perspective:
..............................
The 19th century occultists, from whom 90% of contemporary literature on magic is derived, had difficulty making this step. They were either reverent towards the conditioned Judeo-Christian worldview despite their occultism, or they were in extreme (even childish) reaction against it. Today, in the 21st century, and as a result of their pioneering work, their suffering and genius in some cases, we are now less conditioned, and, hopefully, more aware that the world is very different to that of either religious or modernist propaganda.
Ceremony and Ritual in the pastMagical ceremonies were conducted in ancestral cultures for two primary purposes: to commune with and draw upon spiritual powers and presences, and to mediate and present such spiritual powers and presences to the community. The first purpose was, and still is, jealously absorbed by political religions. The second purpose is the historical origin of all theatre (including the modern film and television industry), but at a deeper level is the ultimate aim of true magical ritual.
Ideas such as self-development, control of supernatural forces and so-forth are materialistic and modern. All ancestral magic, be it formal and complex such as the ancient Mysteries of the classical or Egyptian civilisations, or the relatively simple folkloric magic of the ordinary people, was deeply involved in ideas such as participation, relationship, transformation through interaction, and, especially, with the resonance of spiritual forces out to the greater world. The now popular concepts of the isolated would-be-superman, who changes things according to his will, or the elite occult group that influences politics and money, came into shape in the 19th century, and have continued in various forms to this day. Most of these are either a) fiction, or b) egocentric wishful thinking.
What is a ritual?A ritual is a pattern, comprising words, movement, sounds, and intentional content such as clothing, implements, and a wide range other factors. The two key concepts are pattern and intentional content. The most important consideration, however, is that this ritual pattern is shared between humans and other beings humans and spiritual beings. You cannot have magic without the harmonious exchange between humanity and other orders of life. A ritual, a ceremony, is a special pattern that enables this exchange.
There are of course, two modes of magic, co-operative and coercive. In this article, we are discussing co-operative magic. Similar principles apply to both modes. However, I have never grasped the sense of a type of magic in which humans attempt to force powerful spiritual beings (more powerful than the human ritualists) to do their will. Does this not seem to be absurd not to mention childish and illogical?
When is a ceremony not a ritual?In some sense we could define any intentional gathering as a ritual or ceremony. But what distinguishes a magical ritual is that the intention always involves spiritual beings. They may be ancestors, faery races, gods or goddesses, trans-human beings compassionate to humanity, the spirits of the living creatures in nature (often rather loosely called totem animals), or conscious entities from remote metaphysical dimensions. If they, whoever they may be, are not part of our ritual, it is not magic. It is merely an empty ceremony.
A ritual and a ceremony are essentially the same thing. The ceremony is the outer form, while the ritual is the magical pattern-making. Hence the popular modern definition that ceremonial magic is the complex stuff with fat scripts, many implements and much arm-waving, while other forms of ritual are somehow more direct or simple. This is not true, of course, but is widely published. A very simple ceremony lasting a minute or two, such as placing an offering of wine upon a dedicated stone, can be a powerful and complex ritual involving humans, spirit beings, forces of nature, ancestral consciousness, stellar awareness! Do not be fooled by props or propped by fools.
extract from RJStewart.org - Ceremony and Ritual Magic