jeffrey
â Ãig Dogâ
wman, then why don't you practiced it? http://www.religioustolerance.org/wic_bibl1.htm http://www.religioustolerance.org/boy_arm2.htm
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That would be hard to do, they are one with each other. (sorry michel for the smiley.)wmam said:You didn't come right out and say it but one could look at what you did say and think you worshiped the Son and not the Father.
I do my best to but I don't see what your meaning is unless you are some how suggesting that you some how love YAH more than me?jgallandt said:wman, then why don't you practiced it?
Am I to take these links as answers to your statement of mistranslations? Also I would like to know of where all these contradictions are between the so called Old and New?jgallandt said:
Look ........... where have I twisted your words? I only asked questions of what you posted and made comments as to how some might take what you said differently. I was curious as to what you had to say and was asking you to show proof. Yes I could google but then why would one want to even come here and post questions and make statements if they all could just go google it? Oh sorry..... I didn't mean to ask another question and make you feel that I somehow twisted your words.jgallandt said:If you really where interested, you would do what I do, a google search. Since you seem more interested in a weak attempt to twist my words, I can only presume you have no interest in learning, only preaching your own beliefs.
Some people think that military intelligence, those words don't go together, but people still use it. Some don't think that Christmas has anything to do with Christ, but millions still celebrate it. Pardus, it's not going away, so you might try to understand it instead of bashing it.Pardus said:Is using that title so important? don't you guys just keep saying they're only words?
jgallandt said:That would be hard to do, they are one with each other. (sorry michel for the smiley.)
Hey, it doesn't matter..... BTW, here's some help on the subjectjgallandt said:(sorry michel for the smiley.)
You mean there still might be hope for your intolerant views?wmam said:Let me rush to throw my Scriptures out the window and follow all that is said on http://www.religioustolerance.org
The Son is the Father. There is no meaningful difference between them.You didn't come right out and say it but one could look at what you did say and think you worshiped the Son and not the Father.
A Christian from 1000 years ago would condemn almost all of modern Christianity and vice versa. Doesn't make either of them less Christian .oh I agree I don't see it as wrong or a sin but in my mind the average Christian does regard it as wrong.
I don't quite understand what it was, specifically that you were asking for wman. Keep in mind what this thread is about and make sure your requests were relevant. Barring that I would be happy to help if I can.Look ........... where have I twisted your words? I only asked questions of what you posted and made comments as to how some might take what you said differently. I was curious as to what you had to say and was asking you to show proof. Yes I could google but then why would one want to even come here and post questions and make statements if they all could just go google it? Oh sorry..... I didn't mean to ask another question and make you feel that I somehow twisted your words.
Oh I agree. I don't give a crap what I call myself . What I disagree with are the following sentiments:Is using that title so important? don't you guys just keep saying they're only words?
wman, that site contains much truth and wisdom, in my humble opinion. It does not require you to throw out the scriptures. It does not require you to do anything beyond be tolerant of others and keep and open mind.Let me rush to throw my Scriptures out the window and follow all that is said on http://www.religioustolerance.org
Wrong as far as I am concerned. Unless you are meaning like since you are your fathers child then so you are your father in a sense? But this would only then hold water if you were like your father in all that he thought and did. If so then please accept my apologies. Otherwise........ So be it.Fluffy said:The Son is the Father. There is no meaningful difference between them.
Glad I no longer consider myself christian.Fluffy said:A Christian from 1000 years ago would condemn almost all of modern Christianity and vice versa. Doesn't make either of them less Christian .
Did I ask you a question? ummmmmmm....... I'm sorry I don't recall. I did ask someone else a question and they took it as I was twisting their words. I don't see you answering for someone else unless that person gives you that right. If they did then you can go and reread the questions poised to said person and answer them.Fluffy said:I don't quite understand what it was, specifically that you were asking for wman. Keep in mind what this thread is about and make sure your requests were relevant. Barring that I would be happy to help if I can.
I don't give a crap what you call yourself either. LOL ..... thats funny. You can combine whatever you want and call it by whatever you want. It makes not a difference to me. But it is not me that one should be in fear of either.Fluffy said:Oh I agree. I don't give a crap what I call myself . What I disagree with are the following sentiments:
Christianity can't be combined with Wicca
If Christianity and Wicca are combined it doesn't result in a mixture that could be happily termed Christian Wicca.
However, if somebody asks me what my religion is, I will answer them, Christianity with Wicca because that is how I view my religion and I think it is the quickest way to sum it up. I don't want to list all of the main tenents of belief every time I'm asked a simple question .
I agree that it contains much Truth and wisdom but it also contains many lies, in my personal opinion. It is not somewhere I could rely on for Truth therefore I will not be going back.Fluffy said:wman, that site contains much truth and wisdom, in my humble opinion. It does not require you to throw out the scriptures. It does not require you to do anything beyond be tolerant of others and keep and open mind.
In my position, it's not so much being incomprehensible but rather abhorible, abominable and blasphemy.Fluffy said:I can totally get where you are coming from since I can easily see myself in a similar position. For example, I do not understand how it is possible to combine Catholicism and Wicca yet people do. Perhaps it is down to a lack of understanding on their part but these people aren't stupid. It is just a path that I cannot walk and I shouldn't be surprised that I find the paths I cannot walk as incomprehensible.
O.K. ...........jgallandt said:Fluffy has the right to answer for me. On this, we see eye to eye.
Yet by your own admittance, you are not a Christian. Some Christians do believe what I stated in the form that you reject and therefore there is no contradiction here.Wrong as far as I am concerned. Unless you are meaning like since you are your fathers child then so you are your father in a sense? But this would only then hold water if you were like your father in all that he thought and did. If so then please accept my apologies. Otherwise........ So be it.
Fair enough.Did I ask you a question? ummmmmmm....... I'm sorry I don't recall. I did ask someone else a question and they took it as I was twisting their words. I don't see you answering for someone else unless that person gives you that right. If they did then you can go and reread the questions poised to said person and answer them.
The point being that the apparent contradictions between Christianity and Wicca are a) in matters of detail b) not said by Christ. Therefore we reserve the right to disregard them as Christ is our guide not the interpretations of those who came before or after him; not those of the first church who, under no divine inspiration, decided to compile some books into the Bible and leave other books out.Mat 22:36 Teacher, which is the great command in the Torah?
Mat 22:37 And Yahshua, said to him, You shall love YAH, your Elohim with all your heart, and with all your being, and with all your mind.
Mat 22:38 This is the first and great command.
Your point?
I couldn't agree more.I don't give a crap what you call yourself either. LOL ..... thats funny. You can combine whatever you want and call it by whatever you want. It makes not a difference to me. But it is not me that one should be in fear of either.
That is a pity. If you are prepared to pick what you percieve as a "lie" I would be totally prepared to debate the point, but in a seperate thread.I agree that it contains much Truth and wisdom but it also contains many lies, in my personal opinion. It is not somewhere I could rely on for Truth therefore I will not be going back.
Again it is a pity you feel you have to label others with negative terminology. Others who, I might add, are doing no harm to anybody.In my position, it's not so much being incomprehensible but rather abhorible, abominable and blasphemy.
Your yet wrong again. Being christian has nothing to do with my disagreeing with your belief. Just because some do isn't all and the some cannot speak for the all. LOLFluffy said:Yet by your own admittance, you are not a Christian. Some Christians do believe what I stated in the form that you reject and therefore there is no contradiction here.
You was given permission so ..............Fluffy said:Fair enough.
Oh so this belief is just another of the many in which fall under the premiss of so called christianity?Fluffy said:The point being that the apparent contradictions between Christianity and Wicca are a) in matters of detail b) not said by Christ. Therefore we reserve the right to disregard them as Christ is our guide not the interpretations of those who came before or after him; not those of the first church who, under no divine inspiration, decided to compile some books into the Bible and leave other books out.
Are you sure?Fluffy said:I couldn't agree more.
Sure....... You make it and send me the link.Fluffy said:That is a pity. If you are prepared to pick what you perceive as a "lie" I would be totally prepared to debate the point, but in a separate thread.
Oh now that is a total lie. I have not labeled anyone negatively. Only actions and beliefs, in which I debate, do I feel negatively about if they fall outside the Truth. And here I thought you didn't care what you called yourself and I was only backing you up.. LOLFluffy said:Again it is a pity you feel you have to label others with negative terminology. Others who, I might add, are doing no harm to anybody.