• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Circumcision should be banned

Rakhel

Well-Known Member
You said that uncircumcised men enjoy sex more than circumcised. I expected you to have something to back that up.
Like a report of a man who was circumcised after being married and complained that he wasn't enjoying sex anymore.
But if it is just your sayso and you aren't circumcised, then you have no basis for your claim.
 

Primordial Annihilator

Well-Known Member
I think that you overly stretch the definition of "mutilation" by including circumcision, and the wide net you cast with it would include other things like, say, ear piercing for little girls... another practice that I don't think warrants an outright ban, even if I wouldn't put my own kids through it.

I do no such thing...mutilation can be carried out in degrees from ear piercing to removing someones nose with a rusty scalpel.

mu·ti·lat·ed, mu·ti·lat·ing, mu·ti·lates
1.
To deprive of a limb or an essential part; cripple.
2. To disfigure by damaging irreparably: mutilate a statue. See Synonyms at batter1.
3. To make imperfect by excising or altering parts.
 
Last edited:

Rainbow Mage

Lib Democrat/Agnostic/Epicurean-ish/Buddhist-ish
For some reason this reminds me of the "Religion is child abuse" BS.

Well I certainly didn't introduce that into the conversation, you just did, but if you want to discuss that, we certainly can. I am religious, so you'd have a hard time convincing anyone that's really what I think.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
I do no such thing...mutilation can be carried out in degrees from ear piercing to removing someones nose with a rusty scalpel.

mu·ti·lat·ed, mu·ti·lat·ing, mu·ti·lates
1. To deprive of a limb or an essential part; cripple.
2. To disfigure by damaging irreparably: mutilate a statue. See Synonyms at batter1.
3. To make imperfect by excising or altering parts.

None of these definitions can be applied to circumscision.

It doesn't deprive someone of anything, it's not damaging, and it doesn't render a person imperfect.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Ear piercings are generally a choice. That's the difference.
So when you see a two-year-old girl with pierced ears, you think this was a choice of the child?

For some reason this reminds me of the "Religion is child abuse" BS.
Interesting, because my position is about the same on both circumcision and raising a child in a religion. For both:

- I see it as something generally negative
- I'm certainly not in favour of it for my own kids
- if anyone asked me whether I thought they should do it for their kids, I'd probably tell them that I didn't think it was a good idea
- if people stopped doing it of their own accord, I'd be fine with this.
- I'm not looking to get it banned, and in fact think that a legal ban would be more harmful than the alternative.
 

Flankerl

Well-Known Member
See that's odd that female circumcision is somehow more taboo then male circumcision. They're both mutilation procedures. Double standard much?


Iam at a loss for words. You two have done it.



Ear piercings are a choice. Circumcision isn't, because no one would choose that.

Awesome you know all the men in the world in person and know what they think about this topic.



Don Quixote on the loose. oO
 

Rainbow Mage

Lib Democrat/Agnostic/Epicurean-ish/Buddhist-ish
I don't think children should be given piercings without consent either. Do children have rights or not? Does rights and protection in our country not extend to children to some extent?
 

Rainbow Mage

Lib Democrat/Agnostic/Epicurean-ish/Buddhist-ish
Awesome you know all the men in the world in person and know what they think about this topic.

Do you know any man that would actually consent to the mutilation of their man organ? If so, I want to meet this person so I can smack him upside the head.
 
I just think it's assualt that causes irreversible damges. People have no idea how delicate human conciousness really is. Doing something like that to an infant to me... is just mortifying.

The thought that we all do it without remorse was one of the revalations that almost ruined my life completely. What is human empathy? People have no idea how imporant it is to be able to feel in general, no matter the nature of those feelings. To cut someone in the most sensitive place before they can even form words is just horrible cruelty.
 
Last edited:
Top