• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Citing staffing issues and political climate, North Idaho hospital will no longer deliver babies.

Secret Chief

Degrow!
Carry on indeed. According to the Census bureau 5.5% of Sandpoint's residents are under 5 years old while over 17 percent are over 65. It's median age is 40, older than normal pregnancy age. Unless the Sandpoint gynecologists are seeing rampant pregnancies among those over 40 the need for obstetrics is shrinking. Like many small towns in America, it is greying and the number of births is steadily decreasing. This leads to less need for birth centers and some, like in Sandpoint, closing. It is demographics, not abortion restrictions that is the root cause.
How do you account for:

"Dr. Amelia Huntsberger, an obstetrician-gynecologist at Bonner General Health, said in an email to States Newsroom that she will soon leave the hospital and the state because of the abortion laws as well as the Idaho Legislature’s decision not to continue the state’s maternal mortality review committee.

“What a sad, sad state of affairs for our community,” Huntsberger wrote."
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Apologies. Seemed like it


I’m not. I think you agree with me on this issue. Perhaps I’m wrong
But you seem to acknowledge that your healthcare system, whilst great, is out of reach of your fellow Americastani.
Unless I’m mistaken?
We'd likely argue about what our solutions should be.
Mine...
- Less regulation of the industry.
- Government financed/provided basic health care.
- Regulating better environmental quality to reduce
carcinogens & respiratory irritants.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Since this is a thread as good as anyone else, is socialism both that the government controls all means of production and property or only some?

I mean when you claim something is socialism, which of these 2 do you mean?
"The people" (which is government) control the means of production.
The typical basic dictionary definition.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Always have to be careful what drugs you ban. Thalidomide, which caused so many horrible deformities in babies when taken for morning-sickness, turns out to be very useful against leprosy and multiple myeloma.
Lawmakers are ill equipped to deal with such complexities.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Privates can manage all the sectors in the world. Finance, commerce, industry...
but healthcare is something serious and only the State should manage it.
Are you becoming more capitalistic now?
I'm shocked at the liberty espoused in your post!
 

Jose Fly

Fisker of men
It's fascinating to watch the conservatives in this thread try and wave this away as anything but what it actually is.

"Hospitals close all the time"....."There's no need for OB-GYN care in N. Idaho"

First of all, the hospital isn't closing. They'll still be open, but will no longer provide pregnancy, labor and delivery care.

Second, we don't need to speculate about the reasons they made this decision, because the hospital put out a news release. It's frustratingly difficult to find, but it contains the following excerpt...

"The Idaho legislature continues to introduce and pass bills that criminalize physicians for medical care nationally recognized as the standard of care. Consequences for Idaho Physicians providing the standard of care may include civil litigation and criminal prosecution.

So at the very least, Idaho's anti-abortion laws are a significant factor in their decision.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
"The people" (which is government) control the means of production.
The typical basic dictionary definition.

How does this concept mesh with the principle of a government of the people, by the people, and for the people?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
How does this concept mesh with the principle of a government of the people, by the people, and for the people?
Not very well. Governments running socialist economies
have always been non-democratic authoritarian regimes.
This is an emergent property of socialism & communism.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
We'd likely argue about what our solutions should be.
Mine...
- Less regulation of the industry.
- Government financed/provided basic health care.
- Regulating better environmental quality to reduce
carcinogens & respiratory irritants.
Actually I kind of agree with you there
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
How do you account for:

"Dr. Amelia Huntsberger, an obstetrician-gynecologist at Bonner General Health, said in an email to States Newsroom that she will soon leave the hospital and the state because of the abortion laws as well as the Idaho Legislature’s decision not to continue the state’s maternal mortality review committee.

“What a sad, sad state of affairs for our community,” Huntsberger wrote."
Sounds like she's upset at a loss of revenue for her.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Apologies. Seemed like it


I’m not. I think you agree with me on this issue. Perhaps I’m wrong
But you seem to acknowledge that your healthcare system, whilst great, is out of reach of your fellow Americastani.
Unless I’m mistaken?
Of course everything in the U.S. is "best" as long as you're rich. Otherwise, if you get a serious illness or injury, prepare for ruinous debt.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Sounds like she's upset at a loss of revenue for her.
Sounds like you're either being disingenuous or have ****-poor reading comprehension.

The imbecilic republicans' war on women made their routine practice too legally risky.

Let's not crawl on our belly to lick theocratic boots. Let's be better.
Prove that you actually give a **** about freedom. That or just drop the facade already.
 
Top