A
angellous_evangellous
Guest
And you loose. Everyone knows the person who brings up Hitler in their argument automatically looses the debate.
Lose ... loses
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And you loose. Everyone knows the person who brings up Hitler in their argument automatically looses the debate.
Lose ... loses
Look out - there's a debate on the loose!
Not on this thread, :biglaugh:
No, because they have nothing to do with Biology. OTOH, if you said that despite your Biology classes, you believe that God magically poofed two of each kind into existence 6000 years ago, they university would be justified in refusing to graduate you with a degree in Biology, especially if you insisted on your freedom to give those answers on exams, and to teach them as representing modern Biology.You could say that about anyone. Say you are a biology major but express views that you admire Hitler, would the university be justified in dismissing you?
No. Now, if you want a degree in history, and you deny the holocaust ever happened, that would be different.If you turn out to be a third reich nut job that's not going to reflect well on the university, but does that really have any bearing on your chosen profession or degree?
I guess that's a no. They seem to say a host of factors. Although not really relevant, if it wasn't birth or biology related wouldn't it be a condition that could be altered?
You could say that about anyone. Say you are a biology major but express views that you admire Hitler, would the university be justified in dismissing you? If you turn out to be a third reich nut job that's not going to reflect well on the university, but does that really have any bearing on your chosen profession or degree?
What do you mean "NOW"?This is getting ridiculous. You're grasping now.
I don't know...maybe she should diligently wait for Jesus instead of hating homos. Whats the point of getting a degree anyway? She'll live happily forever in heaven in her anti-agnostic believes and the world she hates is gonna end soon anyway.Link
So, what do we think? Does the school have the right to take this action? Are they wrong for trying to expel her from the program?
actually it would if said Nazi sympathizer also believed in Nazi Darwinianism contrary to his biology major.You could say that about anyone. Say you are a biology major but express views that you admire Hitler, would the university be justified in dismissing you? If you turn out to be a third reich nut job that's not going to reflect well on the university, but does that really have any bearing on your chosen profession or degree?
What do you mean "NOW"?
Lose ... loses
Give him a break. You know how bad those English types are with writing their own language.
Clearly I need to leave the party, as everyone seems to be having so much fun without me.
Bottom line for me. Expressing an opinion vs practicing or intent to practice that opinion are two different things. If the university can fully prove that she had planned intent to practice her conversion therapy and other like minded "therapies" then they are right to condemn her. If not, then I think she should be vindicated.
If someone doesn't have a basic understanding of science, they don't have any business in the field.
HOWEVER, there are plenty of seminaries and divinity schools that might be happy to take her into their many ministry degrees.
You should sue the tants off of them!Yes.
And I should sue the pants off them if they try to deny me one of their degrees just because I told them I plan on teaching Tantric techniques in meditation. That's discrimination!
You should sue the tants off of them!
Her intent is not, or should not, be at issue. It's not the job of university officials to read minds or to see the future. The issue is her inability to successfully complete the program.Bottom line for me. Expressing an opinion vs practicing or intent to practice that opinion are two different things. If the university can fully prove that she had planned intent to practice her conversion therapy and other like minded "therapies" then they are right to condemn her. If not, then I think she should be vindicated.