gnostic
The Lost One
beerisit said:Since those stories are in fact Judaism and Christianity, then I would have to disagree. The hypothetical part of the question concerned just that, if those religions and therefore those stories did not exist, then would anybody believe Muhammad when he brought those stories from the cave? That to me is the essence of the OP. If the OP author is available and wishes to correct me then I will stand corrected. But to engage in the discussion of the OP and then claim that the basis of the hypothetical can be challenged doesn't seem to make sense to me.
Without those religions we wouldn't have the stories, because we don't have them anywhere else now. The stories were completely relient on those religions before Islam.
, :no: (Oh, no), beerisit. You're (as well as Caladan and YmirGF) on the right track. it is hypothesis that if everything in Judaism and Christianity didn't exist, which would include every individual books & letters, every traditions, biblical figures (from Adam to Jesus' last disciples/authors, but would also include angels with names), then Islam could not possibly exist.
How could it?
What loveroftruth, Godobeyer, f0uad and other Muslims that replied here don't understand is how much Muhammad and Islam are indebted to all the traditions that went before it. They are relying on the all-powerful god-did-it assumption, therefore without any thinking what the OP is actually saying; hence they provided the usual no-brainer answers.
They also don't know where/when the names of angels (like Gabriel) originated. They were invented names, out of the Jewish contact with Zoroastrianism.
Muhammad's night journey to Jerusalem, but in particular his journey to see the various heavens as given in the Hadith, is like Enoch's visit to heavens, as narrated in both books of Enoch. The books of Enoch were written in the 2nd century BCE (Hellenistic period), and was clearly not written by Enoch. These books also influenced Christian teachings, just as it had clearly Islamic teachings.
No, beerisit. You're not wrong with your understanding of my original question.