Yes it does.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Defute the Bible or not!
- Thread starter EnochSDP
- Start date
mycorrhiza
Well-Known Member
No, but it makes it not backed by actual evidence. We can't know if it's true, but if it isn't backed by any evidence at all, chances are that it isn't true. I think we should trust archeologists when it comes to archeology. You don't need to read the Bible literally, after all.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Doesn't necessarily make it untrue, but it does make it untrustworthy.
Songbird
She rules her life like a bird in flight
Debates involve sourcing and reasoning. Your OP doesn't qualify as a debate, but rather a series of unsupported views. You can surely have views. Just be aware that no one is persuaded by anything lacking sources. In fact, to put it gently, it does the opposite - you seem to be persuading people that you have done no research and found no sources. You are actually assuring people that they are right - that the Bible is easily refuted because someone who claims to be able to defend it cannot.
Great. You are calling your own source unreliable.
Listen, real qualified professional archeologists have searched for evidence of the Exodus and found none. You have given us an unverified unreliable source claiming there is. I feel quite comfortable saying it is not true.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Oh I See. They just placed Jesus's birth prior to Herod the Great's death. Wouldnt that just screw up timeline somehow??? I mean it's 4bc were talking about.
EnochSDP
Active Member
Again not one refute has come that questions the Bible.I nhave the ultimate source the Bible and God.Thats what im asking to refute.what other information I need to answer refutes from the Bible.
Plenty of refutations have been given (of a literal, inerrant interpretation, anyhow). You've just either ignored them or claimed some phantom evidence that nullifies the refutation.
BTW - you still haven't addressed one of my posts:
And just so we're clear: the reason why I'm asking you to do this challenge is because the details of the different accounts contradict each other. IOW, it's impossible for all of the Bible to be literally true.
EnochSDP
Active Member
It still doesnt make it so,There are many more than that one claiming that we search the wrong location.doesnt make it untrue.You exspect me to go back thlusands of years to bring back physical proof?The question was refute the Bible not give instances that can not be proved or unproved.No one can say it did not happen for sure.But ill be honest my research on this peticular subject is lackin and thats why im researching it.this is not over.i just posted a interesting article that supports.wont be the only one.fantôme profane;2919635 said:
It's not like a million-plus people would only be in one location.
Look: the modern-day population of the Sinai peninsula is around 500,000 people. That should give you a sense of the scale of the Exodus if it occurred. How much evidence should 600,000 men and their families leave? Is the evidence predicted by this claim there? If it isn't, then this implies the claim is false.
EnochSDP
Active Member
Tinelines are messed up anyway.they are close but off.But i do not see how it would.and no herod died between 6BC an 4BC.Jesus was born 4BC to 2BC.
Songbird
She rules her life like a bird in flight
Well, it looks like you needn't have started this thread. You weren't looking for refutations or debate, but a platform to declare your views.
FWIW, you accomplished that. While no one has been persuaded to agree with you, you did air your viewpoint.
EnochSDP
Active Member
Should be.should be.but it doesnt make it false.Really though how much evidence would there be in forty years without civilizing the region regardless how many people?what evidence are you looking for buildings,towns,bones?
Bones should be there but cities and buildings doesnt have to be.
Me Myself
Back to my username
How many women visited the tombd Of Jesus? Did they come in before telling anyone? Did they see anything weird or supernatural outsie of the tomb or at it´s entrance? was the rock over the tomb in it´s place when they arrived?
How many angels did the women find at the empty tomb of Jesus?
Did the women told the apostles or were they too frigthened to say anything?
I would be amazed if you could answer any of this questions without contradicting any of the 4 gospels.
How many angels did the women find at the empty tomb of Jesus?
Did the women told the apostles or were they too frigthened to say anything?
I would be amazed if you could answer any of this questions without contradicting any of the 4 gospels.
EnochSDP
Active Member
BTW one has in private chat!I did something.I can start any thread i wanted.You did not have to reply but i appreciate it.
My views will always be with me but I fully agree and accept reasonable thoughts.
NOTE:Evolution is not clear cut or reasonable to consider as fact
EnochSDP
Active Member
what is the question here?arem these are refuting the Bible?what do you want here? to answer these questions, the Bible does that.Im not here to teach you the Bible but to answer refutes, if you are presenting one then make it clearer.
The Bible itself says the Bible is flawed. Therefore, if you don't believe the Bible is flawed, then you don't believe what the Bible says about itself, in which case, obviously you consider it flawed.
So: either the bible is flawed, or it's flawed.
There's your defutification.
Me Myself
Back to my username
You mean like when Jesus refuted eye for an eye? or some other part?