Quantrill
Active Member
Nay...you mentioned two Edens....
Where did you get that idea?
And how do you apply it to the topic title?
You brought up Lucifer in Eden. See. Go do some research. Sart another thread.
Quantrill
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Nay...you mentioned two Edens....
Where did you get that idea?
And how do you apply it to the topic title?
You brought up Lucifer in Eden. See. Go do some research. Sart another thread.
Quantrill
Your ability to engage in actual conversation is becoming harder and harder in the face of opposition you cannot counter, I see.
Resort to blankfaced rote statements of faith.
Nothing new to see here.
Weakling pleaseI respond in kind. In other words, you haven't produced anything to merit much discussion.
Quantrill
Now.... you have me confused with someone else.
Pay attention.
Weakling please
I've split apart anything you've said with facts and reason; essentially anyone responding to you has.
You're choking out single sentences of dogma that are barely, or even not, related to what you're responding to.
I haven't heard of Lucifer having been a gaurdian angel over Eden. I do believe Scriptures indicate that Lucifer had access to the Eden upon earth prior to his fall. But that Eden was different than the one where Adam and Eve were placed. Possibly the same area, but different in time, and condition.
So, Lucifer prior to the fall had acess to the Eden of God and did visit it. After the fall he went to the Eden where Adam and Eve were, and indwelt the serpent.
Quantrill
You were answering someone else when you wrote this digression.
Care now to explain a second Eden?
Or do you need to go look it up?
If you're willing to rebuttal....try to stay up on what you profess.
And how does this relate to the topic title?
That was in response to their comment. I didn't intend to start another subject. And I don't intend to now. As I said, do your own homework, or start another thread.
Quantrill
Because it is contary to His Holy nature. All sin is against God. And His nature reacts to sin in judgement only.
Yes, you can say what you like. Only it is contridictory to God as given in the Bible.
Quantrill
You mean he remains your god. A god who is not omnipotent, certainly is not omniscient, claims to not being omnipresent and certainly is not omnibenevolent.quantrill said:No, again, God cannot cease to be Himself. That doesn't affect His omipotence, omniscience, or omnipresence.
He remains God.
From what attribute do you infer this (bolded) conclusion?
What exactly in his nature is it contrary to?
Quote the part of the bible that supports your argument then.
You mean he remains your god. A god who is not omnipotent, certainly is not omniscient, claims to not being omnipresent and certainly is not omnibenevolent.
What godly attributes does your god actually possess?
Which godly attributes does he possess that convince you he is still a god?No, He remains God. Whether you or I like it or not.
I have already told you.
Quantrill
Which godly attributes does he possess that convince you he is still a god?
After all he's not omnipotent because he can't just forgive.
He's not omniscient otherwise your life is meaningless.
He's not omnipresent because he asked where A&E were in the garden.
He's not omnibenevolent, just look at the stories.
But your posts have agreed with everything I wrote there, so you deny all of those attributes as well as me.God is God. Nothing needed to convince me. His attributes are all those you deny and more.
Quantrill
But your posts have agreed with everything I wrote there, so you deny all of those attributes as well as me.
How can you deny his godly attributes and still call him a god?
God is God, no matter what God may be. Rather empty...What a fool. You claim I agree with you and then ask me how I can deny something.
I acknowledge God and all His attributes.
Quantrill