If he wasn't crucified what would he need to forgive them for. Forgive them for not crucifying the son?but....why did he have be crucified in order to forgive them?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If he wasn't crucified what would he need to forgive them for. Forgive them for not crucifying the son?but....why did he have be crucified in order to forgive them?
Hey, Wild, I know it can get overwhelming when you are debating a whole bunch of people on the same exact points so don't feel obligated to respond to my previous ones since it has most of the same stuff as above.
Also, I was much more pleased with the analogy in Post 308 than the one I gave you.
This bit above caught my eye though.
How exactly is it "just" to kill an animal for my wrong doing? Do you think the concept of a whipping boy-- one kid being whipped/punished so that the kid who actually did something wrong gets off scot free-- is just?
If he wasn't crucified what would he need to forgive them for. Forgive them for not crucifying the son?
What is surprising is that killing the son didn't have the opposite affect. Something like "You all killed your salvation so now your screwed."ahhh
so lets set up a situation where jesus looks like the good guy...
sort of like creating a disease and unleashing it unbeknownst to the population and then say..."look everyone, i have the cure"
What is surprising is that killing the son didn't have the opposite affect. Something like "You all killed your salvation so now your screwed."
LOL ok so based on your view, if I truly love someone they should be able to walk all over me all they want to, because i should have to keep forgiving them for doing me wrong. Is that a deliberate childish nonview of your point??
You just told me YOUR opinion on the right way love works. Guess what, I DONT AGREE WITH YOU. Thats all that needs to be said about that.
No it isnt. If you love someone that doesnt mean not holding them responsible for wrongful acts. Apparently your view of love is greatly misplaced.
Good question, dont know what i was thinking there Look, the human sacrifice was Jesus laying down his life and as an atonement for mankind. When someone does wrong, they need to be held accountable for it in Gods eyes. The death of Jesus covered that accountability. So what is the beef that you have with this??
You're not aware, sure you're not.
You've been asked several times for God's attributes, and your answer repeats as 'God is God'.
That's a response, not an answer. So you never answered those questions.
I'm not going back to repaste everyone's questions at you. Go read back. 'Do your homework', as someone said.
I don't know, at this point, who cares. There will be no real answers from you.
I'm saying you're relying on tautologies to weasel out on defining a term. If you refuse to define it, you might as well be talking about grass. x = x
'His Holy Nature' is extremely vague.
I have read the entire Exodus and Leviticus already, and i know of no point in there can support your argument that it is part of 'His Holy Nature' being unable to allow sins to go unjudged. Sin is indeed in opposition to God's will, however there is no contradiction in God allowing sin to go unjudged even so. You are welcome to formulate it if you wish to do so.
This quote of yours doesn't support your argument.
All it does is support that God, according to David, can judge people for their sins. It is unrelated to your position.
And I still want to know how what Jesus/God did can be considered forgiveness.
God judges sin everywhere. No sin will be left unjudged. Your hoping with blinders on.
The quote proves exactly my point. Davids sin was against Bathsheba and Uriah. Yet the Holy Spirit through David says, 'Against thee and thee only have I sinned'. Or as I said, all sin is against God.
Quantrill
are they in heaven or at least on the waiting list?
The quote does NOT prove your point. As i said, it just shows that God CAN judge sinners. Not that he MUST judge sinners.
'Who' He is.
Quantrill
Good point ^above^ because according to John [5 vs22,27] the Father judges No man, but he has committed all judging to his Son.
God gave Jesus all authority to execute judgment because Jesus is Son of man.
to assume one can know who god is...
is delusional.
:sorry1:
The quote does NOT prove your point. As i said, it just shows that God CAN judge sinners. Not that he MUST judge sinners.
to assume one can know who god is...
is delusional.
:sorry1: