1robin
Christian/Baptist
Yes. All your claims were obviously biblicly (is that spelled right, it looks retarded) specific or at least seemed to be.To be clear, you ARE talking about the god of Abraham?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yes. All your claims were obviously biblicly (is that spelled right, it looks retarded) specific or at least seemed to be.To be clear, you ARE talking about the god of Abraham?
Yes, primarily Biblical.Yes. All your claims were obviously biblicly (is that spelled right, it looks retarded) specific or at least seemed to be.
Yes, primarily Biblical.
waitasec said:experience...empirical evidence
so, how do you know it's the last piece of the puzzle?
how do you know it's a puzzle?
if you believe that sort of thing...
are you telling me you empirically witnessed or experienced the events in genesis?There you go.
real pieces make a real puzzleIt's a 'puzzle' for the same reason there are these questions, e.g., the OP's.
are you telling me you empirically witnessed or experienced the events in genesis?
real pieces make a real puzzle
not questions, they point in all directions
a historian will gather up empirical evidence or gatherWould you ask a historian if they've witnessed or experienced something before their time?
I'm using the dictionary definition of "puzzle." What do you mean?
a historian will gather up empirical evidence or gather more than one source to confirm any claims...
is it the definition for a 3D puzzle?
I think it's fairly obvious to anyone who's paying attention to the questions that are still being asked, and a social climate that's still dealing with reconciling people to each other, that it's not the last word. It just can't be explained away like that without asking some tough questions and raising some tough issues.Then?
I think it's fairly obvious to anyone who's paying attention to the questions that are still being asked, and a social climate that's still dealing with reconciling people to each other, that it's not the last word. It just can't be explained away like that without asking some tough questions and raising some tough issues.
the dilemma that the last piece has been provided, yet the world is not whole.What can't be explained away?
the dilemma that the last piece has been provided, yet the world is not whole.
Perhaps you'd better explain it again. It's late, I'm sleepy, I've been dealing with social justice issues all day, and I got stopped at a sobriety check point a little while ago. :drunk:I chose my wording pretty carefully, I don't think you understood exactly what I was referring to.
I don't know each historian's methods. Maybe so. Sounds like a good idea. But, I still don't think a historian could witness or experience anything before their time, though..
Unless it was still occurring in some fashion. I have heard that history repeats itself.
having more then 1 source helps to determine/confirm if something that was claimed to have occurred actually occurred.
history repeats itself when we don't learn from the past...
i see a few common denominators throughout history, guess what they are...?
religion and the desire of power
And so??????????
That's pretty picky.
but it's true.
can you give me another common factor that has been predominant in throughout history?
not until you answer my question...There's so many, I honestly have a hard time picking one.. And they look to be all there. Can you name any that have disappeared?