lol
All you could do was either to give some lies
:biglaugh: Here we go with this again...Sorry but no lies were given...unless you're changing the definition of the word.
Please check the mirror. You've done it a few time in a couple threads here at RF.
doubt the authenticity of Jesus
No I haven't and I've already proven I didn't.
No I haven't and I've proven that as well.
Again your opinion about my statement is useless.
And that's "your opinion" of my opinion....
It wasn't addressed to you but it does apply to you.
I do recall addressing some one else and you responded to what I said to that person. But so you know....this is a debate thread so you're just going to have to get use to it.
You both were trying to stick to the bible in discussion.
When it comes to the 4 gospels and as to what Yeshua said or didn't say....uhhh, yeahh!
Once you got defeated, you just said "it's not authentic".
<-- ultimate proof of defeat.
Shows how little you know about your scriptures then. It's without a doubt that there are plenty of verses in your scripture that were obviously added on purpose to promote a certain theological presumption. On the other hand there are some not so obvious and
"may not" have been done on purpose..mistranslations in your scripture. If the authenticity of your scriptures have been called into question by me or others here it was for good reason and probably that a consensus of scholarship agreed said verse(s) weren't authentic (example: 1John 5:7-8).