Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Not a fan of the Universalists huh? I made the comment because you said you weren't sure that Hell actually existed, and the Universalists steadfastly believe that Hell does not exist and humanity is universaly saved. You may notice that I call my self a Unitarian even though I go to the Unitarian Universalist church. That's because I'm a Unitarian Christian rather than a Universalists. I don't believe you can have a Heaven without a Hell. I have to much Taoism in me.
This is not what I call a Fundie.
Now this is exactly what I call a Fundie.
I like that. Kind of reminds me of when you pray in the name of Jesus it doesn't mean you say in the name of Jesus when you pray.The book of Romans says that everything created knows it's creator and is without excuse. What is apparent is that while the name of Christ saves it may not be incumbant that one know the proper name of God to be saved.
So you're saying that the punishment will fit the crime for everyone, not just children. I like that but doesn't it go against the tenet that the only way into Heaven is through Christ? And isn't the only other option Hell? I know many Christians who will not budge on this and believe there are no exceptions at all.
but just because I'm not as in your face about it and don't hide Biblical truths about God's love and fairness don't mean I ain't a Fundie
The Bible clearly condemns certain cultures who, say, worshipped Dagon or Baal or other false gods. You seem to wish to ignore the point that I've reitterated from Romans that every thing created knows it's creator. It is this creator God, whether you choose to call Him Yahweh or Jim that needs to be accepted not a fertility goddess or some such "lesser god."How do you know primitive cultures were not yet ready to see God as we see him and instead saw him through the filters of their culture? The pantheon that they worshiped may have been nothing more than individual aspects of the same God you worship today.
It's implied, I believe. Since through Adam, death passed upon all mankind, and that death is because man cannot have both the knowledge of good and evil and live forever that I make the implication. If offspring did not have that knowledge then why ban them from the Tree of Life? Or how do children gain that knowledge later?Could you please provide some scriptural support for the statement that children are born with the knowledge of good and evil? I'm unaware of anywhere in the Bible where are we told such a thing.
The Bible clearly condemns certain cultures who, say, worshipped Dagon or Baal or other false gods. You seem to wish to ignore the point that I've reitterated from Romans that every thing created knows it's creator. It is this creator God, whether you choose to call Him Yahweh or Jim that needs to be accepted not a fertility goddess or some such "lesser god."
"Thou shalt have no other gods before me." Exodus 20:3 KJVHow do you know that the fertility goddess was not God appearing to a culture that was not ready to see him as we see him. So they are worshipping God by calling him a fertility goddess. Does a child understand everything that you do as an adult? Does their understanding of things not change as they grow older? Can this not also happen with a people? Who are we to say that the fertility goddess of old was not the same God we worship today, only seen through the eyes of the children we once were? I think this fits with the created knows the creator just fine, considering what we know changes as we change.
"Thou shalt have no other gods before me." Exodus 20:3 KJV
Any old name will do?Yeah, yeah, I know the dogma. My personal belief is this is just human competition sneaking into spirituality. God didn't care what gods man worshiped as they were all him in the end. It was priests who cared who worshiped who as that was their power base. I know you wont agree with me but its still what I believe.
Any old name will do?
I guess it's implied to you. It's not to me. I believe we die because Adam brought death into the world. We also inherit from him our human nature, and with it, the propensity to sin. I don't believe we actually become sinners, though, until we sin -- meaning choose to disobey God's commandments. I believe that children are born free from sin, but as they come to understand the difference between good and evil, will inevitably be drawn towards bad choices (i.e. sinful behavior).It's implied, I believe. Since through Adam, death passed upon all mankind, and that death is because man cannot have both the knowledge of good and evil and live forever that I make the implication. If offspring did not have that knowledge then why ban them from the Tree of Life? Or how do children gain that knowledge later?
According to Jainism , They will go to Heaven , Hell or Earth depending on their behavior in previous births.What happens to innocents when they die and have not had the chance to accept Christ as their savior? What about the children of Wiccans? Atheists? Buddhists? Any of these children who die say, before the age of 2, are they condemned to Hell because they haven't been baptised or christened in a Christian ritual?
Obviously this is a question for the Christians out there but lets hear everyone's opinion on the subject.
According to Jainism , They will go to Heaven , Hell or Earth depending on their behavior in previous births.
In Islam theres different opinions, but most held opinions is that either they go to heaven, or that God will test them on the day of judgement and based on that they enter either heaven or hell.
According to Jainism , They will go to Heaven , Hell or Earth depending on their behavior in previous births.