janesix
Active Member
That isn't proof. TRY againPut the components together and sit back and watch.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That isn't proof. TRY againPut the components together and sit back and watch.
It has similarities. But like I said I haven't studied it in depth. Why do you ask?So nothing with the Epic of Gilgamesh?
That isn't proof. TRY again
Yawn. Been there, done that. Boring. You atheists are so predictable.Because the evidence shows them to be true.
How did the physical laws come to be?Sure it is. What is missing? No outside intervention anywhere.
What natural meaning do clicks have?We come up with using the clicks because they already have an existing meaning that exists within natural laws.
Yawn. Been there, done that. Boring. You atheists are so predictable.
How did the physical laws come to be?
Yawn. Been there, done that. Boring. You atheists are so predictable.
"Let there be light" is not a mechanism, it's an incantation. How it works remains a mystery, ie: magic.The polyester in our shirts is a side effect of people making those shirts. God doesn't create without mechanism. God said let there be light.
Scientists do, all the time. Evolution, black holes, dark matter and energy, there is a long list.I suppose so. We don't get to just make up anything that suits us.
Yes, keep going. How did those laws come into being?Once again, the physical laws describe how things work. So any answer to 'how' would involve such laws.
All scientists do these days is make crap up, in a desperate attempt to avoid doing the real work.So evidence and conforming to observation is irrelevant?
Scientists do, all the time. Evolution, black holes, dark matter and energy, there is a long list.
I have many times, and am just not in the mood for it now. It's old news. But it involves convergence, predictability, probability, and other thngs.We wonder why you don't just set forth the
disprove of the the theory of evolution.
You would be hailed as the greatest scientist of all ti,me AND, the rest of your sayings would get so much more credibility.
Or tell me how to do it, I won't bevshyvabout grabbing the publicity!
So, whats the data contrary ToE?
The disproof?
That is almost certainly confirmation bias. How about all of the times that the Bible was wrong?
'"Let there be light" is not a mechanism, it's an incantation. How it works remains a mystery, ie: magic.
If it weren't magic; if it were understood, we could reproduce the effect with the requisite technology.
Can I ask you a question?
What natural meaning do clicks have?
Phonemes and words are abstract symbols. A word's correspondence with it's referent is arbitrary. The sounds conveying the concept of 'dog' is different in different languages. The phonemes used -- clicks, sibilants, plosives, various vowels, &c. -- are arbitrary.
Why would a sense of right and wrong require there to be a deity.
For that matter, why would it even provide more than weak support
for the notion that there was a deity?
God capitalized is a proper name, a specific god. Assuming there
is a god, do you have reason for believing that god is God?
Because we have prior knowledge there was a builder. What
prior knowledge do we have that the universe had a creator?