Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
doppelgänger;979589 said:You aren't human?
And human thoughts and language created both of them.
It still sounds like you"re talking about your own ego.
Super Universe,
re: "What is the reason you don't believe in God?"
A person can only venture a guess as to why they don’t have a belief in a supreme being because it is not possible to consciously choose to believe or not believe things.
That is fantastic. I don't think Russell anticipated this gem with his celestial teapot so I'll extend it with another analogy:Super Universe said:Your ego has absolutely nothing to do with believing in God? Hmm, then why does God HAVE to visit you in order for you to believe? Why are YOU so important that almighty God has to come over?
However, that is compelling only to the extent that existence does not necessitate a deity possessing such attributes.I believe God does not exist because the attributes that afford him his status as God make the likelihood of his existence less than the likelihood of his non-existence.
Yes.I didn't say I wasn't human. Still applies that humans get caught up in the time thing.
Human thoughts and language created the law and God? I guess they created matter as well then.
And the many other things that we don't understand. Funny how human thought can create something that it doesn't even understand. (sarcasm)
It sounds like I'm talking about my own ego? No, talking FROM my ego maybe, not about it, but once again, I have no problem with admitting I have an ego. But, ego or not, I am in the same situation as you are. Doesn't matter that I believe and you don't, we're both at the same level and you might just beat me to the finish line.
Do you mean as in an ontological argument?Jay said:However, that is compelling only to the extent that existence does not necessitate a deity possessing such attributes.
I'm stuck in this place just as you are.
You don't have to agree with anything and I certainly never said I didn't have an ego.
But I'm the only one admitting to it, unlike every athiest in here.
I disbelieve God's existence because I do not see any evidence for his existence.
I believe God does not exist because the attributes that afford him his status as God make the likelihood of his existence less than the likelihood of his non-existence.
That is fantastic. I don't think Russell anticipated this gem with his celestial teapot so I'll extend it with another analogy:
The Flying Spaghetti Monster is especially angry with the swathes of non-believers who are too egotistical to believe in it without first expecting it to provide evidence of its existence.
doppelgänger;980001 said:Yes.
[/size]
Silly rabbit. The understanding is also in the thought (as is the not understanding).
[/size]
Follow the conversation though. Read the part that goes along with the conclusion. Everything you describe as a "Creator" can be accomplished by your own self awareness and use of language. Everything.
Contemplate it on the tree of woe.
The OP did not ask ask anyone if they have an ego or not. The OP aked if we thought our ego is the reason we don't believe in god.
Oh, since you are pointing out the OP, you didn't answer the OP either...
What is the reason you don't believe in God? Or the reason you're not absolutely positively sure God exists?
I'd guess the number one reason is because people see bad things happening all around them and can't understand why God would allow it to happen.
[/QUOTE]Now the key question, where would you rate your own ego as a reason and do you realize it's the main reason?
[B said:And what evidence do you have that my ego is the main reason I don't believe in God? Do you know me at all? What qualifies you to make such a judgement?[/[/B]quote]
It amuses me when SU talks of ego, he seems to have enough ego for all the posters on this forum!
This hardly seems like a good model for debate since the list of pieces of evidence that would convert me to theism is very long. An example would be rabbits in the Precambrian. If you would like more I can provide them but they would be along similar lines as the example and I'd like to know where you are going with this first.Super Universe said:You do not see any evidence for God's existence? What would satisfy you then?
God's existence means that unintelligent matter/energy created God. Consequently there are 3 possibilities:Super Universe said:God's non-existence means that unintelligent matter/energy created quite a complex system that is precise to an incredible degree. .00001 deviation in the atom and it all comes apart.
It is irrelevant whether he is angry. My point does not rest on that so simply discount the attribute.Super Universe said:FSM angry? If the FSM created the universe and gave me free will, why would it then be angry that I exercised my free will?
That would be my self-awareness and use of language, not yours. In other words, if you decide "God" doesn't exist. Then "God" doesn't exist. Period. I can't make your universe for you. Only you can do that.Everything can be accomplished by my own self awareness and the use of language? Everything huh?
Okay, use language to convince me that God does not exist then.
I didn't? Does this not count?
I don't believe because of inconsistancies in Biblical accounts and a lack of supporting evidence.
BTW, there's a valuable lesson in that, which would have saved you much anguish in this thread trying to refashion other's realities by force of your own will. Of course, I can't make you learn that lesson either. I don't have that much ego.doppelgänger;980377 said:I can't make your universe for you. Only you can do that.