McBell
Unbound
same here.I get more people at my door trying to sell me newspapers. :beach:
In fact, I get more people at my door trying to sell me Girl Scout Cookies....
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
same here.I get more people at my door trying to sell me newspapers. :beach:
I get more people at my door trying to sell me newspapers. :beach:
Not nearly as good as Girl Scout Cookies.at least newspapers are more practical.... cupons, classifieds
Not nearly as good as Girl Scout Cookies.
Thin Mints Rule!!
That's cool. Concentrate on the people who want to learn about the bible. Makes sense.i am a preacher but i dont go out with the one thought to change someones mind. I go out, first and foremost, because its is a direct bible command for me to do it.
Secondly i go because i know there may be someone somewhere who wants to learn something about the bible. They are the ones we are searching for.
Love the sentiment in your post. Your signature line is a hoot, too.As much as you don't think there is any arrogance involved, others see it plainly. There is arrogance involved when you think you have some great answer others don't have or cannot understand. There is arrogance involved when you think that by your mere belief alone you are somehow better off than others around you. There is arrogance involved when you think, by your sheer words about your religion alone, can somehow "save" someone else. The thought that your beliefs, your words, your religion are that much better and more important and more RIGHT than anyone else's is sheer arrogance. This is what makes proselytizing an act of condescension. This is what makes it so insulting, vile, and disgusting.
I'm sure it's possible for atheists to go door to door proselytizing, I've just never encountered it.People "push" all kinds of things though.
Not every world view is religious.
Not every attempted "conversion" has to do with religion.
So many people cannot find the place where their domain ends,
and other persons' domains begin.
They do not RESPECT the autonomy of others,
to be who and what THEY choose/want/desire to be.
People are intrusive, opinionated, judgmental, arrogant, pushy, assuming,
righteous, forceful, manipulative, dilusional, misguided and just plain annoying
in their attempts to get everyone around them
to "see, do, live, believe and 'understand'" like they do.
Whether it be religion, philosophy, politics, lifestyle, personal Style,
career, school and education, jobs, 'hobbies',
causes, traditions, status quo... whatever.
This usually begins at home with family, then school.
Work, friends, church, neighbors....
The pressure to "be this" or "that",
because someone else "believes you should be".
It all reduces to pier pressure.
People themSelves are pillars/piers.
We all hold up/ up'hold something, or another.
That's cool. Concentrate on the people who want to learn about the bible. Makes sense.
Doesn't make sense to proselytize other other religions because you don't respect other people's choices. (I use the 'you' generally, not referring to you specifically, Pegg).
and tat can be applied to your religion too...everyone has some form of belief system though...so naturally we will be speaking to people who already have a religion. But for many people, religion was not a choice but a matter of geographic location or a family tradition
some people are of religions they do not even believe in. Talking to such ones does not constitute a lack of respect because we are not going with the intent on changing their religion...only they can do that. We go with the intent giving them a choice.
If you try and convert me from Buddhism to Christianity, by telling me that Buddhism is completely invalid, I wouldn't be able to be your friend, (especially, if you won't take no for an answer). Christianity, Catholicism specifically, was not my choice, but forced on me by family tradition. When I was old enough to choose, I left the RCC and found Buddhism.everyone has some form of belief system though...so naturally we will be speaking to people who already have a religion. But for many people, religion was not a choice but a matter of geographic location or a family tradition
some people are of religions they do not even believe in. Talking to such ones does not constitute a lack of respect because we are not going with the intent on changing their religion...only they can do that. We go with the intent giving them a choice.
Maybe that is just projection.Draka said:As much as you don't think there is any arrogance involved, others see it plainly.
How is it at all arrogant to think you have an answer, perhaps if you believe others cannot understand it, but just the thought of having an answer in and of itself? Is it arrogant to tell a flat-earther that the world is an oblate spheroid?There is arrogance involved when you think you have some great answer others don't have or cannot understand.
What do you mean by "better off"?There is arrogance involved when you think that by your mere belief alone you are somehow better off than others around you
That would indeed be arrogance, I might even think it more arrogant than you. I'd also say greater than 90% of Christian proselytizers would never presume this.There is arrogance involved when you think, by your sheer words about your religion alone, can somehow "save" someone else.
That is absurd, at least two of those can have empirical bases. Beliefs, and words, can most assuredly be more right than others, reference again a flat-earther.The thought that your beliefs, your words, your religion are that much better and more important and more RIGHT than anyone else's is sheer arrogance.
Because I am unabashedly arrogantHow can you presume to speak for "90% of Christians who proselytize"?
Arrogant Christians aren't the best PR reps for their faith.Because I am unabashedly arrogant
Also, I know what Christianity teaches in this regard.
Ah, but does not the proselytizer presume to know the inner workings of the mind of someone they are trying to preach to? Are they not presuming that the person they preach to is somehow lacking in regards to spiritual or religious knowledge because they don't believe the same as them? And is it not presumptuous to assume they know better than their poor victim?Maybe that is just projection.
There is far more arrogance involved in presuming to know the inner workings of the mind of someone you've never met and only have a single behavior to work with than involved in believing you have a religious truth.
To assume you have the one and only CORRECT answer to the point of feeling you must tell it to everyone else and encourage them to believe as you...that is, in fact, very arrogant...yes.How is it at all arrogant to think you have an answer, perhaps if you believe others cannot understand it, but just the thought of having an answer in and of itself? Is it arrogant to tell a flat-earther that the world is an oblate spheroid?
The whole attitude of being "saved" or having "achieved salvation" and having the opinion that others are not "saved" from some eternal wrath or torture. That attitude in itself is arrogant. That they are specially loved and will get rewarded for their particular belief while others will suffer for not basically agreeing with them. That's what I mean by "better off".What do you mean by "better off"?
I also have to wonder how you can claim to speak for more than 90% of all Christian proselytizers.That would indeed be arrogance, I might even think it more arrogant than you. I'd also say greater than 90% of Christian proselytizers would never presume this.
I have yet to see a person who believes in proselytizing their religion honestly believe that their religion is at least equal to, let alone worse, than mine. That their words, their scripture, is equal to mine, let alone worse. That my religion is just as important, in the grand scheme of things, as theirs. If they believed all that, they most likely wouldn't be telling me I'm wrong and I should believe what they believe.That is absurd, at least two of those can have empirical bases. Beliefs, and words, can most assuredly be more right than others, reference again a flat-earther.
Further, beliefs and words can certainly be better, depending on what you are measuring. For instance, some words can be better at inspiring than others. Some beliefs can be better at promoting peace than others.
Import is at least somewhat in the eye of the beholder, though there can be objective understanding as well. At this moment in time, Islam might just be the most important, as far as worldly concerns go, belief in the world because of the impact it has.
If you try and convert me from Buddhism to Christianity, by telling me that Buddhism is completely invalid, I wouldn't be able to be your friend, (especially, if you won't take no for an answer). Christianity, Catholicism specifically, was not my choice, but forced on me by family tradition. When I was old enough to choose, I left the RCC and found Buddhism.
Just so you know, I'm never rude to a JW who comes to my door. I merely tell them I'm Buddhist and I appreciate that they are motivated by wanting to keep people from suffering.
I think its rude to tell other people their religious choices are wrong and your path is the only valid one.
Arrogant Christians aren't the best PR reps for their faith.
I'm sure it's possible for atheists to go door to door proselytizing, I've just never encountered it.
no....i have to figure it out for myself...i am not not just going to take anyone's word, it's called being skeptical
This position is stagnant. As pointed out before....you're stuck.
Having doubt is one thing....failing to proceed is something else.
but as i said...just because someone says something is true without me validating it, won't make it true or false for me.
Holding something as true...without proof is called faith.
We know you lack this ability.
assumption and an intelligent guess are not synonymous
one is based on facts or past experiences while applying logic and reason.
the other takes something for granted (which isn't reasonable or logical) or accepts it as true without fact.
Open a thread for logic and let me know.
It's not what most people think.
give me the facts, show me the proof, let me experience it for myself; that is my criteria for lying.
how presumptuous of you...no i'm not. i'm figuring out for myself...meaning there is movement, progress.This position is stagnant. As pointed out before....you're stuck.
but isn't that statement coming from and angle of control?Having doubt is one thing....failing to proceed is something else.
you want to buy some land? send me some cash...Holding something as true...without proof is called faith.
We know you lack this ability.
another assumption on your part....Open a thread for logic and let me know.
It's not what most people think.
So you're going to wait for a photo?... a fingerprint?... a repeatable experiment?....
a slap up side the head?
The last one could happen.
Standing up from the flesh, with denial in hand.