Six wells is more water, and more chance maybe more water.
If I consider all buses take to Rome are same, I will not choose just one always take me to Rome.
Most of Ideas here are comes from beliefs.that's definitly critizising religions.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Do you think/believe that your body was designed/created?
- Thread starter Godobeyer
- Start date
Six wells is more water, and more chance maybe more water.
If I consider all buses take to Rome are same, I will not choose just one always take me to Rome.
I will illustrate.
|_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_|
vs.
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|_|
What gets you more water?
Right. But I haven't got to Rome yet. I'm still on the bus.
Shad
Veteran Member
It is just a meme to me that believers fall back on when they have no argument that can stand scrutiny.
6 wells suppose produce water water more than 1 well.
If the bus got broken,would you switch to another one ? or wait until they repair it ?
Yes if I am consider all buses the same as mine, I will switch buses, to avoid being boring.
6 wells suppose produce water water more than 1 well.
Your well will reach the oil
If the bus got broken,would you switch to another one ? or wait until they repair it ?
Yes if I am consider all buses the same as mine, I will switch buses, to avoid being boring.
6 wells suppose produce water water more than 1 well.
Your well will reach the oil
If the bus got broken,would you switch to another one ? or wait until they repair it ?
Yes if I am consider all buses the same as mine, I will switch buses, to avoid being boring.
Right, but it's about the depth. You've gotta commit to one thing.
The bus hasn't broken down, it's still taking me where I need to go. And it certainly is not boring!
There is places don't required deep to get water,yours will reach the oil
I guess you meant plane
I suspect it's will never blow the tyre too.
There is places don't required deep to get water,yours will reach the oil
OK, well I hope you get my point.
I guess you meant plane
I suspect it's will never blow the tyre too.
I don't know what you're talking about now really.
The path to God which I am on is the one I've been given. How it'll change as I travel it, I don't know, but it's taking me where I need to go.
Back to origin point
If I am said ALL religions lead to same location,I personally will never ever critisize them.
I will have no problem to switch on them or pray to God by way of them too.
Back to origin point
If I am said ALL religions lead to same location,I personally will never ever critisize them.
I will have no problem to switch on them or pray to God by way of them too.
Not necessarily that all religions do lead to the same place, but that all have the capacity to. Yeah, I pray to God in the way different traditions do it. No problem. There's just a particular way which I am centred in.
Is someone hack your account yesterday or what ?
Because of clear contradiction,switch opinions !
If you read and understand, you'll see that it is not. All religions can lead to the same place, they can be paths to truth. Not that they all do so necessarily.
I think all religions can be valid paths towards one truth,I think all are paths which can lead to God.
Not necessarily that all religions do lead to the same place,
Really ?
Yeah. Really.
A car, a van or a bus can all take you to the same town. But it doesn't mean they go there automatically, you've gotta drive them in the right direction.
We were speaking about arrive location. "God" by different faiths (directions).
It's like you said ; Yesterdayt :"ALL lead to same location", then Today :you said "NO it's not necessary they lead to same location."
You don't speak English fluently, Godobeyer.
All can take you to the same place. It doesn't mean that all will do so if you follow them in a non-productive way.
I knew that you will say this
It's very clear that you made contradiction,in both sentences.
Also by saying before that you don't consider any religion is wrong, in same time you criticize all time religions in RF.
Why this arrogance "never make errors" ?
I had no problem to say "Yes I made mistake".
I knew that you will say this
It's very clear that you made contradiction,in both sentences.
Also by saying before that you don't consider any religion is wrong, in same time you criticize all time religions in RF.
Why this arrogance "never make errors" ?
I had no problem to say "Yes I made mistake".
Dude, I haven't said two different things. You just don't understand the sentences, I'm sorry but that's what it is.
If I make errors I will gladly admit to them, as I have done before on RF.
Do I criticise all religions? I criticise interpretations and ideas, but I don't think you'll find me often criticising a religion. A religion is too flexible a thing to be criticised wholesale.
I do understand the sentences.
I do believe you made a clear contradictions.
Yes criticise interpretation and ideas of what ? I suspect you meant "religions"
So you said "religions are not wrong", so why you criticized them ?
Nah.
Yes criticise interpretation and ideas of what ? I suspect you meant "religions"
So you said "religions are not wrong", so why you criticized them ?
They're associated, no synonymous.
I don't see a religion as just a set of truth claims.