We do make difference.but we believe both are not designed/formed them selfs.It is weird to me that so many people cannot see the difference between humans and cars.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
We do make difference.but we believe both are not designed/formed them selfs.It is weird to me that so many people cannot see the difference between humans and cars.
I speak about belief in Creator, most of world believe in.The watchmaker argument has in fact been refuted.
I very doubt this true.
This poll don't deny the fact that most of world population are theists.
atheist are very minority.
I speak about belief in Creator, most of world believe in.
Apparently not.We do make difference.but we believe both are not designed/formed them selfs.
Shad specifically said the watchmaker argument has been refuted.I speak about belief in Creator, most of world believe in.
Shad specifically said the watchmaker argument has been refuted.
Shad specifically said the watchmaker argument has been refuted.
Most of the world used to believe the world was flat.
That tomatoes were poisonous
if a horse hair was left in a barrel of water outside it would turn into a worm.
"most of world believes" is not evidence.
Apparently not.
Given the analogy that both have to have a creator when it has not been shown outside wishful thinking that humans require a creator.
Sad it is that the very next post he confirms your point.He does not know what we are talking about. He is parroting arguments he heard but does not understand which is basic apologetic repetition.
It has not been shown that humans have been created."There is nothing created by it self" it's very simple idea,but you seems don't get it
We disagree over the terms used as it can be easily used as a watchmaker analogy in a bait and switch. Which is probably already has been in this thread (speculation). We speculate where this argument is heading as we are familiar with typical setups for the analogy and the OP is just this type of setup.
Your own post shows that you follow the premises of the analogy or argument in comparing things that are known to have a creator/designer then inferring this means there must be a single creator for everything. This argument has been refuted centuries ago.
They believes it's true, why they should convinced others by?]So what? The world being most theists does not make their belief true. This is nothing but an ad populum argument.
That's democraty. majority always win.Being in the minority does not mean we are wrong by default. This is merely the reverse of the above fallacy in that a minority view is wrong for being a minority view.
It is weird to me that so many people cannot see the difference between humans and cars.
At least you should believe that sperm and egg created youIt has not been shown that humans have been created.
It has been boldly declared ad nauseum, but never shown.
"There is nothing created by it self" it's very simple idea,but you seems don't get it
Sorry typo error, I meant "any thing"Based on observations of a sampling but not everything in the universe thus is a inductive conclusion thus you can not say "nothing" unless you have discovered everything. Your point is moot as your logic is flawed.
Do I need to explain the different between inductive and deductive reasoning?
That's democraty. majority always win.
Nope, it shows my own belief only, and things being refuted does not necessarily mean it is indeed refuted. It's just someone else's belief, in comparison
Sorry typo error, I meant "any thing"