Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Says she whose great and unmatched wisdom shall not be doubted.That's because it clearly is...
The story of the rich man and Lazarus (a common name at the time) is also a parable....it too is not a literal story, but one rife with symbolisms.
This is how I understand the parable......
Paul didn't know how he went to third heaven/paradise but he was sure he went there and he believed access to this realm is possible - in body or out of body. The later means that someone can leave a body (and stay awake). According to Paul it's possible.This experience by Paul is not clearly stated in exact detail, even Paul himself did not understand what had happened to him....so no one really knows what sort of vision he had.
He said...."I know a man in union with Christ who, 14 years ago—whether in the body or out of the body, I do not know; God knows—was caught away to the third heaven. 3 Yes, I know such a man—whether in the body or apart from the body, I do not know; God knows— 4 who was caught away into paradise and heard words that cannot be spoken and that are not lawful for a man to say."
"Caught away to paradise" doesn't necessarily mean heaven. The first paradise was right here on earth. So in all probability it was a vision. All we know is that "flesh and blood" cannot exist in heaven. No one really knows what the third heaven is.
Paul wrote..."But I tell you this, brothers, that flesh and blood cannot inherit God’s Kingdom, nor does corruption inherit incorruption. 51 Look! I tell you a sacred secret: We will not all fall asleep in death, but we will all be changed, 52 in a moment, in the blink of an eye, during the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised up incorruptible, and we will be changed. 53 For this which is corruptible must put on incorruption, and this which is mortal must put on immortality. 54 But when this which is corruptible puts on incorruption and this which is mortal puts on immortality, then the saying that is written will take place: “Death is swallowed up forever.” 55 “Death, where is your victory? Death, where is your sting?” 56 The sting producing death is sin, and the power for sin is the Law. 57 But thanks to God, for he gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ!" (1 Corinthians 15:50-57)
Those chosen by God for heavenly rulership will inherit immortality, but those resurrected to the earth will remain in their mortal flesh, but without sin and the trees of life being available to all...death will not trouble those who have an earthly paradise to enjoy. (Revelation 21:2-4)
OK...at birth, I believe that we are a new creation....the genetic product of our parents. I do not believe that we have lived before our birth, or that we will live on after death. We are who we are while we are in this body. We are judged by the choices we make in this life.
The "geography" of afterlife:"Hell" in the Bible is the grave.....it is no more sinister than that. Even "gehenna" (incorrectly translated as "hell") is nothing of the sort.
There is no consciousness in death and unconscious souls feel no joy or torment....they feel nothing...they know nothing.
That's absolutely true. Even if the story told in a parable didn't actually happen, a parable would never teach something that was flat out contrary to known truths. In order to fully understand a parable, one must bee able to discern the knowledge that is beneath the surface, while accepting that the simple, straightforward story (without what it may symbolize) does not teach falsehood.We know that parables have a symbolical meaning but the signifier itself is based on some facts and actual beliefs. The richman and Lazarus wouldn't be depicted in some place after death if there wasn't such a belief. If in a parable a plant grows from seed is this also a natural fact.
Very good point. I've never seen this example mentioned before. I'm curious about your beliefs concerning the Third Heaven and how you equate it to Paradise. Do you see the existence of a third heaven as implying that there is also a first and a second heaven?Paul didn't know how he went to third heaven/paradise but he was sure he went there and he believed access to this realm is possible - in body or out of body. The later means that someone can leave a body (and stay awake). According to Paul it's possible.
Agreed.1 Cor 15:50-57 is about expecting the Kingdom of God to come soon (in the time of then generation). Those who will be dead when this happens, will be resurrected and become immortal and incorruptible (sinless). Those who will be alive will not have to die and be resurrected but they will be changed when alive, so they will also become immortal and incorruptible. No heaven and discarnate spirits here. It's about Kingdom of God on earth.
True. Whenever the phrase "flesh and blood" is used in the scriptures (there are no exceptions that I can find), it is used as a metaphor for "mortal man" as opposed to a resurrected being. It doesn't really have anything to do with literal flesh or with literal blood.Paul said "that flesh and blood cannot inherit..." because in the Kingdom you put on a different body - spiritual body that isn't able to die and sin (by logic: consequence of sin is death).
And how do you explain that verse? Since you're a Christian, it would not follow that you believe in reincarnation. So how is it possible that the man in question could have sinned prior to his birth?And his disciples asked him, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?” (John 9:2)
What about that? Very different from the "tabula rasa" theory. Sounds more like belief in reincarnation.
We know that parables have a symbolical meaning but the signifier itself is based on some facts and actual beliefs. The richman and Lazarus wouldn't be depicted in some place after death if there wasn't such a belief. If in a parable a plant grows from seed is this also a natural fact.
Paul didn't know how he went to third heaven/paradise but he was sure he went there and he believed access to this realm is possible - in body or out of body. The later means that someone can leave a body (and stay awake). According to Paul it's possible.
1 Cor 15:50-57 is about expecting the Kingdom of God to come soon (in the time of then generation). Those who will be dead when this happens, will be resurrected and become immortal and incorruptible (sinless). Those who will be alive will not have to die and be resurrected but they will be changed when alive, so they will also become immortal and incorruptible. No heaven and discarnate spirits here. It's about Kingdom of God on earth.
Paul said "that flesh and blood cannot inherit..." because in the Kingdom you put on a different body - spiritual body that isn't able to die and sin (by logic: consequence of sin is death).
And his disciples asked him, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?” (John 9:2)
What about that? Very different from the "tabula rasa" theory. Sounds more like belief in reincarnation.
The "geography" of afterlife:
Paul equates third heaven to paradise. Yes, I think it implies there are more heavens. The Hebrew word shamayim is in fact a plural noun ("heavens"). Bible also mentions "the highest of heavens" (or "heaven of heavens") and different ranks of angels in heavens ...I'm curious about your beliefs concerning the Third Heaven and how you equate it to Paradise. Do you see the existence of a third heaven as implying that there is also a first and a second heaven?
What do you believe the resurrection will be like? Do you believe that the "spiritual body" you speak of will have a physical form of some sort or that it will be spirit only?
And how do you explain that verse [John 9:2]? Since you're a Christian, it would not follow that you believe in reincarnation. So how is it possible that the man in question could have sinned prior to his birth?
Ecclesiastes 12:7.Ecclesiastes 12:14. Hebrews 9:27. I have the thinking of a jw witness so I say the answer is no.What do you think?
Old books don't mention resurrection either (Sadducees kept this old belief). Resurrection was intruduced in Second Temple period. Yes, belief in immortality of soul is even later.The Hebrew Scriptures do not mention heaven as a destination for humans at all.....because the ancient Jews had no concept of life after death. They believed in physical resurrection...
I agree. That's why I believe heavenly state is only interim.We are all designed to live in an earthly paradise, free from suffering, ageing, sickness and death. So we should not mistake our desire to live in paradise with a desire to go to heaven. That was never Gd’s purpose for our existence. We are placed here with all of God’s qualities to be be caretakers of his earth.
Old books don't mention resurrection either (Sadducees kept this old belief). Resurrection was intruduced in Second Temple period. Yes, belief in immortality of soul is even later.
I agree. That's why I believe heavenly state is only interim.
Not all OT ofcourse. Only older part. Torah, Ecclesiastes... Belief in resurrection is in later books - Isaiah and Daniel.What old books are you talking about? OT? Because they did know about the resurrection. David knew, job, prophets, etc. Adam and Eve should have know that too.
Fascinating. I agree with almost all of what you've said, but I'm genuinely surprised to hear that you're a Catholic. That doesn't sound much like Catholic theology to me, not that it matters in the slightest. It sounds like you've given all of this quite a bit of thought.Paul equates third heaven to paradise. Yes, I think it implies there are more heavens. The Hebrew word shamayim is in fact a plural noun ("heavens"). Bible also mentions "the highest of heavens" (or "heaven of heavens") and different ranks of angels in heavens ...
I believe human spirit in some non-physical or less physical form is only in the waiting state for the next (full) bodily life. A different question is the change in expected "end times" ("harvest time", coming of Kingdom). Human relations and society will change but also bodies ...
I'm Christian (Catholic) but I don't believe in religious monopolism, dogmatism, fanclub rivalism ... Until I'm in this life and don't know anything about prebirth or afterlife I'm open to different views - yes, also reincarnation. It seems more in favour of learning and universal justice.
The verse in question could imply that at least some Jews might believed so. There was hellenistic Judaism with strong Greek influence ... The Jewish doctrine of reincarnation emerged much later in Middle Ages.
Not all OT ofcourse. Only older part. Torah, Ecclesiastes... Belief in resurrection is in later books - Isaiah and Daniel.
Old books don't mention resurrection either (Sadducees kept this old belief). Resurrection was intruduced in Second Temple period. Yes, belief in immortality of soul is even later.
I agree. That's why I believe heavenly state is only interim.
Paul wrote in prison he was torn between staying here to encourage and help Christians or to dpart and be with the Lord
which is far better,
Why would he be torn if the choice was staying here and helping Christian or rotting in the ground