Kelly of the Phoenix
Well-Known Member
Sounds more like an infrastructure problempeople are defecating on the sidewalk, "crappy" is not used figuratively here.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Sounds more like an infrastructure problempeople are defecating on the sidewalk, "crappy" is not used figuratively here.
It’s also a privilege. Society doesn’t make access to bathrooms a priority.generally people use toilets, it's the norm, it's sanitary. when people start defecating on the streets you know things are going in the wrong direction
Adam’s purpose was weeding and cleaning up poop. Other animals do better at it.doesn't atheism give us an account of how the world was created and what the purpose of life is?
Au contraire mon frere. It appears that there are various forms of prostitution among some animals. Chimps have their own version of "dinner and a movie":Other creatures do show the same sentiments. Elephants bury their dead, for instance. I've seen armadillos mourn their loved ones after they were turned into roadkill and rabbits cry over watching their spouses swept away in rivers. I've seen all sorts of animals wail when their young is killed or harmed, and it can cause them to go into lasting states of grief where they show signs of lethargy.
Domesticated animals like horses, cats, and dogs have also been shown in studies to have an innate sense of what you might call "fairness." For instance, when they live with other domestic animals who get more treats than they do for the same tasks, they tend to protest or try to "correct" the unfair treatment.
Drug dealing and prostitution are mostly human issues, so they don't really apply to animals. That said, you underestimate the emotional complexity of animals.
Likewise, in regard to your comprehension of morality - which is expected when a Christian debates with a Stoic.Hedonism is a philosophy about righteousness, so that's a contradiction. I also think it's worth noting that the majority of ethical philosophies are founded on a self-coherentist approach to moral intuition. That is, they take our feelings about certain issues, abstract and generalize them, and then correct any contradictions that arise.
Ethical philosophy is actually a perfect example of what I'm talking about in that sense.
I disagree completely for the reasons I've already given
I'm sorry Ella, but your reaction to your hypothetical proposition that 'even if God did exist', shows the irrationality behind your logic. If God did exist, and you, and everything under the sun, were created by Him, what justifiable contention could you possibly have with the way that He governs the universe - He create you and your mind, your feelings and your ability to live, think, hate and love?I have something else I wanted to point out about what you're saying here.
Religious morality is not absolute. It's relative to that religion. In Christianity in particular, that morality takes the form of a divine law which is enforced by judging the individual and sentencing them to the relevant afterlife.
This is really no different from what human courts of law do, which is completely artificial. In practice, all you're doing is submitting yourself to the authority of the church, which is composed of people, or to the laws laid out in scripture, which were also written by people. There's nothing there to make them universal.
Even if God were to exist, which he doesn't, the God that you're talking about is totalitarian. He would punish me for the thought-crime of not believing in him, despite the fact that I can't help but not believe he exists, and he would do so with a punishment that is literally incomprehensibly horrible.
Is that really justice to you? It's difficult for me to imagine a situation that I would consider even more unjust, except maybe if I was being punished for someone else's wrongdoing. That's also a common belief in Christianity, though, thanks to Original Sin.
ETA: So what you're claiming is moral due to some "intrinsic property" isn't really the reality of Christian morality as I see it. Christian morality is hoping to be rewarded by God for your obedience, or at least submitting to his threats.
I don't believe in an afterlife or a God to judge me, so I don't believe the laws attributed to God have any such consequence. That's the real disagreement here.
Maybe you need to recheck you comprehension of the animal kingdom, and rethink what showing selfish and survivalist aggression towards a scavenger means, as opposed to organizing demonstrations and showing indignation towards the notion of theft.Human beings kill each other in droves, all the time. Should I list all the wars that have been fought since we've been on this planet?
As to the rest of it, you really need to study up on the animal kingdom, if you truly believe that other animals "don't protest when another animal steals their food" or that they aren't upset when a family member dies."
It appears that you believe that "might makes right" by this post. Are you saying that a creator cannot be evil?I'm sorry Ella, but your reaction to your hypothetical proposition that 'even if God did exist', shows the irrationality behind your logic. If God did exist, and you, and everything under the sun, were created by Him, what justifiable contention could you possibly have with the way that He governs the universe - He create you and your mind, your feelings and your ability to live, think, hate and love?
So that's is what causes children's cancers, your God.I'm sorry Ella, but your reaction to your hypothetical proposition that 'even if God did exist', shows the irrationality behind your logic. If God did exist, and you, and everything under the sun, were created by Him, what justifiable contention could you possibly have with the way that He governs the universe - He create you and your mind, your feelings and your ability to live, think, hate and love?
..rather than making flippant comments, what do you think is responsible for cancers, and why they are on the increase?So that's is what causes children's cancers, your God.
I would suggest that you take your own advice. I've already studied the animal kingdom in great depth in university, hence my comments to you on the subject.Maybe you need to recheck you comprehension of the animal kingdom, and rethink what showing selfish and survivalist aggression towards a scavenger means, as opposed to organizing demonstrations and showing indignation towards the notion of theft.
So what? Just because somebody supposedly created me doesn't mean they own me or that I owe them anything. My mother doesn't demand blind loyalty from me, just because she gave birth to me. She doesn't own me. And neither does some God.I'm sorry Ella, but your reaction to your hypothetical proposition that 'even if God did exist', shows the irrationality behind your logic. If God did exist, and you, and everything under the sun, were created by Him, what justifiable contention could you possibly have with the way that He governs the universe - He create you and your mind, your feelings and your ability to live, think, hate and love?
I have absolutely no idea where you people get your ideas from???So what? Just because somebody supposedly created me doesn't mean they own me or that I owe them anything. My mother doesn't demand blind loyalty from me, just because she gave birth to me. She doesn't own me. And neither does some God.
I find the God of the Bible to be immoral and not worthy of worship.
Doctors are working hard to stop the cancers your God created in children and adults. Some of these adults are mothers with young children. Why does your God do that to children and mothers?I have absolutely no idea where you people get your ideas from???
The Creator of the universe owns us all - try and stop Him.
You still haven't told us what is responsible for cancers, and why they are on the increase .. in your opinion, that is.Doctors are working hard to stop the cancers your God created in children and adults. Some of these adults are mothers with young children. Why does your God do that to children and mothers?
So are doctors immoral and evil for going against God's will by saving the lives of children?
I'm educated and rational, so I defer to what science reports as a natural set of causes, some of which are genetic while other causes are behavioral or environmental.You still haven't told us what is responsible for cancers, and why they are on the increase .. in your opinion, that is.
No, I completely agree with what you say.I'm educated and rational, so I defer to what science reports as a natural set of causes, some of which are genetic while other causes are behavioral or environmental.
Of course you are a religious person and will reject this factual explanation, and claim your God is the cause for all that occurs in the universe, including fatal diseases.
I don't entirely know why, outside of the fact that when man does not abide by God's laws and precepts, even going as far as denying His existence, that there are repercussions both physically and mentally, even affecting nature itself (God cursed the earth after the fall of man).Doctors are working hard to stop the cancers your God created in children and adults. Some of these adults are mothers with young children. Why does your God do that to children and mothers?
So are doctors immoral and evil for going against God's will by saving the lives of children?
So you don't dispute that your God is responsible for cancers, in cluding those that affect children.I don't entirely know why, outside of the fact that when man does not abide by God's laws and precepts, even going as far as denying His existence, that there are repercussions both physically and mentally, even affecting nature itself (God cursed the earth after the fall of man).
Some of these consequences were inflicted by God Himself, others are results of our own actions and attitudes.
I'm sorry Ella, but your reaction to your hypothetical proposition that 'even if God did exist', shows the irrationality behind your logic. If God did exist, and you, and everything under the sun, were created by Him, what justifiable contention could you possibly have with the way that He governs the universe
- He create you and your mind, your feelings and your ability to live, think, hate and love?