Of course not.Was that meant to be a serious question?
Why....is it something you'd actually do?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Of course not.Was that meant to be a serious question?
In all seriousness, you are a better person than Trump.I've never slurped at his boots. The closest I've ever come to that is to bow down before my TV whenever I see him, and repeatedly declare, "I'm not worthy! I'm not worthy!"
I don't cheerlead for Hamas.Of course not.
Why....is it something you'd actually do?
I just realize I'm not worthy of sitting in my recliner when Trump speaks.In all seriousness, you are a better person than Trump.
Poe?I just realize I'm not worthy of sitting in my recliner when Trump speaks.
His second coming will be announced in November, and he will take his rightful place of power next January 15th.
Wrong website.Poe?
He was using your logic.Was that meant to be a serious question?
Condoning the killing of civilians = pro-terrorismI don't cheerlead for Hamas.
Projection. Definitions were given. To get more a price is required. You do not get to demand that others do your homework for you for free.People have given up expecting that anymore. Now we expect dodging, weaving and deflecting, and we're never disappointed anymore.
What "name calling"?
It depends on the public and which media. Obviously reputable media is superior and reliable, as is rational citizens.Do you mean that public opinion and media bias are the arbiters of truth when you don't agree with a judge and jury?
It makes him a rapist.
He was found liable for sexual abuse (and for defaming E. Jean Carroll about said sexual abuse).
"In New York, someone can only be convicted of rape if they can prove vaginal penetration by a penis. In Carroll’s testimony, which mirrored what she had described privately for decades and publicly for the first time in 2019, she said Trump used both his fingers and his penis in the assault. But during the trial, the jury had only concluded that Trump had “deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll’s vagina with his fingers, causing immediate pain and long lasting emotional and psychological harm,” Kaplan’s decision from last year reads.
That the jurors did not find that Carroll had proven rape, Kaplan explained, “does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’” “Indeed,” he continued, “as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Federally, rape is defined as “penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” This broader explanation, while still dependent on penetration, would include assaults using fingers. "
A federal judge has gone to great lengths to make clear Trump really did rape E. Jean Carroll
Why state-level legal minutiae impacts what words are used to describe the former president's criminal conduct.www.motherjones.com
I find that to be a severe conflict of interest and a serious flaw in the justice system.Nor did OJ get convicted of double murder as if that means he’s innocent.
Trump avoided a trial due to statute of limitations, and OJ got off due to a poorly run prosecution. Both are liable for their crimes in civil court. And both still getting into criminal trouble that they are being held accountable for.
And next week she will end her campaign and endorse Donald J. Dementia. She hopes to be put in charge of the Capitol security so his embarrassing comment will become a prediction.Nikki saying Trump has dementia .. and all kinds of other nasty things competitors in a primary are going to say about each other.
They don't have a topic because they know they are losing the argument, so it almost alway results in personal attacks instead as evidenced by the many posts reflecting that already.I don't support biden or his family members.
Let's stick to the topic, shall we? (Hint: I'm not the topic.)
Would you say the same thing if those fingers were in your daughter, I wonder....Trump is not convicted and sentenced for rape.
That was more of an observation than name calling.Nikki saying Trump has dementia .. and all kinds of other nasty things competitors in a primary are going to say about each other.
Trum[p] even predicted that so many would blindly follow him no matter what he did, with the example he gave about shooting someone in the face on 5th Avenue and they'd still forgive him. And so many of them are Christian? Sounds more like pretend "Christianity" to me.
I have long said (and been roundly criticized for saying it) that my own observations lead me to suppose that a very great number of "believers" do not truly believe in their heart of hearts, but rather "believe that they believe."Sure does, doesn't it?
What a piece of work is a man! how noble in reason! how infinite in faculty! in form and moving how express and admirable! in action how like an angel! in apprehension how like a god! the beauty of the world! the paragon of animals! And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust?Ah yes! Barfing! That's another activity I will enjoy watching.
I suspect you presented far to many facts in to short a time.Nor did OJ get convicted of double murder as if that means he’s innocent.
Trump avoided a trial due to statute of limitations, and OJ got off due to a poorly run prosecution. Both are liable for their crimes in civil court. And both still getting into criminal trouble that they are being held accountable for.