Ehav4Ever
Well-Known Member
It has been so long I don't remember. It was more than 15 years ago.How awful. I hope they were charged with a hate crime.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It has been so long I don't remember. It was more than 15 years ago.How awful. I hope they were charged with a hate crime.
@Bharat Jhunjhunwala Amarna is KMT am I understanding correctly. Canaan is Ghuram located in India, why would Yadavas-Hebrews be in Ghuram in India around 1406 BC for?I don't see the connection. Please help. Hebrews reached Canaan around 1406 bce. So amarna reference could be to them coming from india.
Google translatingOne simple problem with the claim that people who can indentified by the historical terms Ivrim, Benei Yisrael, Yehudim, or Jews should indentified as "Yadava farmers" is the simple problem that early Ivrim never were indentified as being farmers. In the Hebrew Torah on several occasions the early Ivrim identified themselves not as farmers but instead as shepherds. They state the same for their ancestors.
View attachment 89743
View attachment 89745
Another proof that in Hebrew Mitzrayim is not in India or even near it is the following. In the Book Esther in the Hebrew Text of the Tanakh, India is called (הודו) or (הדו) which is pronounced Hodu.
View attachment 89816
View attachment 89817
View attachment 89818
and again you will notice that Mitzrayim is Egypt.
View attachment 89819
Google Translate
I hope it shows and not just says attachmentsOne simple problem with the claim that people who can indentified by the historical terms Ivrim, Benei Yisrael, Yehudim, or Jews should indentified as "Yadava farmers" is the simple problem that early Ivrim never were indentified as being farmers. In the Hebrew Torah on several occasions the early Ivrim identified themselves not as farmers but instead as shepherds. They state the same for their ancestors.
View attachment 89743
View attachment 89745
You are perhaps right that Hebrews were yadava shepherds. But farming went together. Thus Hebrews lamented watermelons and cucumbers. The main point is there origins in india.
Unless it's myth.Cain practiced crop cultivation since he brought
the fruit of the ground as an offering to the Lord
@Bharat Jhunjhunwala thinks Cain was Indra. How come Indra was a prophet? How did that happen back when? Cain wasn't a prophet; how come?Unless it's myth.
In any event, what should be clear, even in a silly thread such as this, is that Cain wasn't [depicted as] a Hebrew.
Who cares. Cain is irrelevant.@Bharat Jhunjhunwala thinks Cain was Indra. How come Indra was a prophet? How did that happen back when? Cain wasn't a prophet; how come?
LoL! You are correct! I had extensive DNA research done on myself and was suppressed to find that I'm related to Bengamin Netanyahu. I have roots in India, Peru, Italy, Scottland but 45% German.The Ashkenazim are descended from Jews who migrated to Ashkenazi ( a city in Germany). They have nothing to do with India. R M124 is found ALL OVER THE PLACE. It means nothing.
All four terms refer to the same tribal people.
How did peru a nd india get in? Are you an Ashkenazi? Do you have r.m124?. I have roots in India, Peru, Italy, Scottland but 45% German.
The Abel.cain conflict represents that of honesty vs progress. We know who won.Who cares. Cain is irrelevant.
It is found in MANY populations of the world. Sometimes a genetic marker is simply of no help in determining origins. It is worth remembering that all humans relate back to the same small group in Africa which became homo sapiens, and so we share MOST of our genetics.The Ashkenazim are descended from Jews who migrated to Ashkenazi ( a city in Germany). They have nothing to do with India. R M124 is found ALL OVER THE PLACE. It means nothing.
Not true. R.m124 is found among 50 to 100 percent of yadavas from India and not in europe
Yes. But show me an area where r.m124 is found in 50 percent plus population.It is found in MANY populations of the world
This is not relevant. Sheesh. Just because it is higher in that population, does not mean that it had its origins in that population.Yes. But show me an area where r.m124 is found in 50 percent plus population.
Teach me then what explain 100 percent people having r.m124. and how else to determine where this gene originated. Truly, I will be happy to learn.This is not relevant. Sheesh. Just because it is higher in that population, does not mean that it had its origins in that population.
First you said 50%. Now you say 100%. Clearly you are not reliable as a source. Thus, I'm simply not going to address your request, since it assumes things not in evidence.Teach me then what explain 100 percent people having r.m124. and how else to determine where this gene originated. Truly, I will be happy to learn.