Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why are there no breaks in civilizations in China for a thousand years before and after your flood?
learn how to use the quote feature this forum provides
Erroneous Extrapolation by mankind in their assuming and dating.
I did use it and was prevented from submitting because of to many tags, etc.. therefore , I deleted them all. But, I see you have personal criticism, and no response to the post.
Unsubstantiated opinion. Provide sources.
You cannot denounce education and science with any credibility what so ever.
When you provide a source that was there at the start of the first of those "civilizations"
.
Outhouse, I haven't denounced all of science and education---just that which is "unsubstantiated" and based on assumptions and theoretical opinions
Stop the circular dancing around the subject. It is dishonest
Either you can show where people in China, Australia, Egypt or Mesopotamia or Israel were wiped off the planet by a global flood or you cannot. And you cannot because it factually did not happen at the date you provided.
It is a fact these places did not have a global flood wiping them out.
sincerly said:Outhouse, I haven't denounced all of science and education---just that which is "unsubstantiated" and based on assumptions and theoretical opinions
Yes you have and your being dishonest.
They are not theoretical opinions. Each civilization has factually existed before your mythical flood date, and after with no break.
If there were a global flood during the 3rd millennium BCE, then there would be geological evidences of such flood occurring on the same date, in every single continent. There are none.
And such flood would have devastated culture of every civilisations. There would break in each culture's continuity. There are none.
In Egypt, hieroglyphic writings began around 3000. If Flood had occurred that affected Egypt, then they would writings wouldn't be the same. It would have affected their arts too. And even more important, there would be not enough human resources to continue to build palaces, temples and pyramids with each successive generation.
Almost every king in the Old Kingdom Egypt built at least one pyramid, and that required a lot of builders. (Some kings have built more than one pyramid in their lifetime, because they were pyramids for their wives/consorts, or even for their children).
There are "flood stories" from all over the earth and there are sea shells on mountains all over the earth.
Most of the newer scientist have extended the age of the world/earth to 14+billions of years. 70 years ago, when I was a Child, the age of the earth was "estimated" at 1 million years B.C..
and there are sea shells on mountains all over the earth.
Originally Posted by sincerly
When you provide a source that was there at the start of the first of those "civilizations"
Hi outhouse, We are discussing the GOD of the Bible and its content/context--Right?? Then quit your ad hominem attacks.
None of the writers of articles you sited were Present when "civilizations were established". All of their estimations are based on a continual wideing of their opinions. Most of the newer scientist have extended the age of the world/earth to 14+billions of years. 70 years ago, when I was a Child, the age of the earth was "estimated" at 1 million years B.C.. Today's it is 14,000 times greater. Like the national debt, "scientist" just keeps adding more years. Even so, no matter how many years are added, they still can NOT bring "something out of nothing." And the "life particle" resides only with the Creator GOD.
The Bible brings all the "facts" in sinc. That "big bang" was GOD speaking and bringing all those atoms HE Made together into specific forms. Like is seen with the combining of Oxygen and Hydrogen to form water. Awesome!!
The Scriptural account by the One who made all things says different. Which of your sources were there??
Geologists will tell you that there simply is no evidence that suggest that the sea levels even reached 300 above current levels. Also, the reason why you sometimes find aquatic fossils and shells at higher altitudes is due to the creation and building of mountain ranges due to plate shifts.
Metis said:Because back then we didn't have the ability to know with more certainty since there was no radioactive dating techniques we could use back then, plus we didn't have enough knowledge about red-shift to tell how long ago the BB took place. As time has gone on, the picture has become much clearer, although there's always going to be some fine tuning needed, such as what we saw earlier this year when the date of the BB was pushed back slightly.
By throwing out the above, YEC's essentially become anti-science while at the same time professing to know "true science". However, either one is committed to using objective evidence or one isn't, but YEC's use pseudo-science that's a far cry from any objective approach at all. Read the accounts of the Dover (Penn.) trial as a case in point.
There is still an ongoing controversy as to the age of the earth and how one evaluates the events reported in the Bible----"age of the earth" and "flood". Even to the validity of the "dating methods".