Never mind, dad.
There is wiki article that provide the details that was lacking in the Independent's article you have cited.
Type "En-Gedi Scroll" at wikipedia.
It has been dated to either 3rd or 4th century CE.
So this En-Gedi Scroll ISN'T OLDER THAN the Dead Sea Scrolls or the Septuagint.
And it only contain a portion of one chapter from Leviticus. It isn't the whole bible. It isn't even whole book of Leviticus.
I am not knocking of its discovery and its importance, but the news article has headline "SCIENTISTS FINALLY READ THE OLDEST BIBLICAL TEXT EVER FOUND".
It isn't the oldest. The Independent journalist has distorted, exaggerated and sensationalized the age of the scroll.
This scroll is dated AFTER Jesus, not BEFORE Jesus, so it cannot possibly be the oldest.
dad, you really need to find a more reliable source, instead of the Independent.