Yes, that is the impression I'm gettingHe may be here to preach and not learn or debate
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yes, that is the impression I'm gettingHe may be here to preach and not learn or debate
Engineers are strange ducks. We are not politically correct. We know what works and what does not. Like I said before the nay sayers in the 1990s were stupid and incompetent and were dis proven.Thank you for stating that it matters to you what I think.
More confirmation of my suspicions since engineers can quite often reason rationally.
Saying something is worthless in a forum. Of course you do realize that when you use the claim of "nay sayers<sic>" that you are only describing yourself. Do you even know what that term means? You appear to be treating climate scientists and climate alarmists as one group. Climate scientists have been repeatedly confirmed to be correct. It was the climate alarmists, like Al Gore, that wee shown to overstating the immediacy of the problem.Engineers are strange ducks. We are not politically correct. We know what works and what does not. Like I said before the nay sayers in the 1990s were stupid and incompetent and were dis proven.
Climate pinhead scientists have a horrible track record on climate analysis. I'm not a nay sayer or a doom and gloom person like you. I am a realist and an innovator. I don't deal with hyperbole or what ifs. That is for left wing pundits with nothing worthwhile to do. Climate scientists have never been correct. Al Whore is a joke.Saying something is worthless in a forum. Of course you do realize that when you use the claim of "nay sayers<sic>" that you are only describing yourself. Do you even know what that term means? You appear to be treating climate scientists and climate alarmists as one group. Climate scientists have been repeatedly confirmed to be correct. It was the climate alarmists, like Al Gore, that wee shown to overstating the immediacy of the problem.
Prove it or admit that you cannot do so. I can show the opposite, but until you either prove your claim or admit to talking out of your posterior I have no burden of proof.Climate pinhead scientists have a horrible track record on climate analysis. I'm not a nay sayer or a doom and gloom person like you. I am a realist and an innovator. I don't deal with hyperbole or what ifs. That is for left wing pundits with nothing worthwhile to do. Climate scientists have never been correct. Al Whore is a joke.
Contrary to popular opinion and belief the sky is not falling and the earth is not over heating. The most pressing problem is plagues like Covid and the global food supply that will effect nearly 8 billion people. It's not make believe climate change or greenhouse gases.
There is nothing that needs my attention to talk about. You can't show anything but lies.Prove it or admit that you cannot do so. I can show the opposite, but until you either prove your claim or admit to talking out of your posterior I have no burden of proof.
Here is the problem, all that you have are personal attacks and apparent falsehoods. I am willing to discuss the actual science but you appear to be afraid to do so.
Thank you for stating that it matters to you what I think.
More confirmation of my suspicions since engineers can quite often reason rationally.
It's hilarious (and sad) reading through this thread. So much for useful debate about an incredibly important topic.
There is no possibility of "electrifying everything". Absolutely none. Time to wake up and smell the delusional optimism.
Copper can't be mined fast enough to electrify the US
Copper cannot be mined quickly enough to keep up with current U.S. policy guidelines to transition the country's electricity and vehicle infrastructure to renewable energy, according to a University of Michigan study.news.umich.edu
And when they do mine it, the "Green energy" people want electric trucks to do it, further raising the cost of mining, and therefore the end product.
But they do seem to like high prices while denying that it's because of their own Green ideas. Probably just blame them on the next Republican to take charge of the White House.
Great idea! You have lots of down time for charging. That's lost $$ you will never get back, besides electric mining trucks can't work in extreme climates. The ' Green Energy' people is all about sticking it the consumer.And when they do mine it, the "Green energy" people want electric trucks to do it, further raising the cost of mining, and therefore the end product.
But they do seem to like high prices while denying that it's because of their own Green ideas. Probably just blame them on the next Republican to take charge of the White House.
Millions or even billions might die before then from the effects of global warming.One good thing is we will run out of oil around 2050 so then it’ll cut way back on greenhouse gases so the Earth will begin to repair itself. Sweet.
Not so much. We have enough oil and natural gas to last several milleniaMillions or even billions might die before then from the effects of global warming.
Are you serious? Either you did not read his post or you did not understand it. It would be rather rude of me to think that your new member was illiterate. So I took him at his word.Further proof that you only hear what you want to hear (which is the opposite of the truth).
Citation needed. And of course putting a hundred blankets on a bed in the middle of summer would never be uncomfortably warm either.Not so much. We have enough oil and natural gas to last several millenia
There is nothing about being politically correct here. The science is simple enough so that even engineers can understand the basics.Engineers are strange ducks. We are not politically correct. We know what works and what does not. Like I said before the nay sayers in the 1990s were stupid and incompetent and were dis proven.
Where do you get this nonsense from? I already posted that the technology is not there yet for some uses.And when they do mine it, the "Green energy" people want electric trucks to do it, further raising the cost of mining, and therefore the end product.
But they do seem to like high prices while denying that it's because of their own Green ideas. Probably just blame them on the next Republican to take charge of the White House.
Nothing is being phased. On the contrary their will be more hole poking for oil and gas next year than ever before. MAGAWhere do you get this nonsense from? I already posted that the technology is not there yet for some uses.
You are using your black and white thinking again. We will be phasing out of using fossil fuels There likely will be some limited use of them for quite some time if not forever. If they were only used for mining operations that would not be a problem at all.
The odds are that Trump will lose again. All of the illegal delaying of his trials will disappear. He will be convicted again and again and again and will likely spend the rest of his days in prison.Nothing is being phased. On the contrary their will be more hole poking for oil and gas next year than ever before. MAGA
Boy it sucks to be you. That's why we have nothing to discuss on fake global warming.The odds are that Trump will lose again. All of the illegal delaying of his trials will disappear. He will be convicted again and again and again and will likely spend the rest of his days in prison.
Now you have revealed yourself as a science denier. How deep does the denial go. Do you deny the measured temperatures of the Earth?Boy it sucks to be you. That's why we have nothing to discuss on fake global warming.
You need to prepare for a Trump Presidency.
It's doubtful he will share a cell with you