Yerda
Veteran Member
I don't know that would be why I asked. Are there examples?So it coerces the UN to further its agenda, correct?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I don't know that would be why I asked. Are there examples?So it coerces the UN to further its agenda, correct?
Off the top of my head, it has initiated dozens of UN resolutions against Israel. None against N Korea or other countries with horrible human rights violations. The OIC wants Jews out of the ME.I don't know that would be why I asked. Are there examples?
Israel is pressured because it is an actual government actively pursuing a massacre. It is really that simple.Instead of endlessly condemning Israel, they could put some heat on Hamas, Hezhollah, Jordan, Iran and Egypt - all of whom share some responsibility for this mess.
How about Jordan, with 4th generation "refugee" camps, and Egypt, with its borders so often closed?Israel is pressured because it is an actual government actively pursuing a massacre. It is really that simple.
Hamas and Hezbollah do not have representatives in the UNO.
Granted, Iran at least deserves some pressure as well. But apparently no one believes the UN to be the best agent for that pressure, for easily guessed reasons.
As for the OIC... I can understand willingness to disregard them. Can I ever.
But there isn't a lot of point in the UNO doing that. The organization is almost entirely of a diplomatic nature; it has very little authority over the represented states. Hearing them can be frustrating, but it is better than failing to.
The US blocked the latest attempt by the UN to take action on human rights .. as it has done numerous times in the past. The UN has called out Israel on war crimes and crimes against humanity on a regular basis in this 7 decade long blood feud .. but every time it tries to do something US blocks it.
The Palestinians have the right to self defence against the occupier .. just like the good citizens of Ukraine. If we would have armed the Palestinians like we did the Ukrainians .. I would venture to guess that these problems would have been resolved long ago ...
50,000 troops 214,000 reserves 250[9]–300 combat aircraft[10] 800 tanks[11] Total troops: 264,000 100,000 deployed | Egypt: 240,000 Syria, Jordan, and Iraq: 307,000 957 combat aircraft 2,504 tanks[11] Saudi Arabia: 20,000[4][2] Lebanon: 2 combat aircraft[citation needed] Total troops: 567,000 240,000 deployed |
I think you bring up some important points. For one thing, from what I’ve read children are indoctrinated into hatred toward Israel/Jews from a very young age and taught that violence against Israel is their duty. A very sad situation, but that’s their environment. Civilians who possibly may have a different perspective, likely must keep their feelings quiet or risk themselves or families being ostracized, imprisoned, or worse. Some attempt escape. I’ve read accounts of people who have escaped, even former terrorists. It’s difficult, though.One aspect perplexes me - the anomaly - concerning Gaza and its people. How is it that the Palestinians in Gaza are generally considered to be entirely innocent, and mostly they probably are apart from those who fervently support Hamas, but where the leadership of Hamas can carry out horrific crimes (as they did against Israel), with such not being justified by any prior equivalence in the history between the two sides (the sheer appalling brutality of this), given this was about as far distant from any decent morality as one can get?
We seem to have a situation where the civilians are constantly portrayed as the innocent victims all the time but where the associated leadership can carry out such war crimes - so a bit convenient. Is this a bit of an anomaly or even schizophrenic - it's not moral when others do such but it is when we do so? Unless of course the civilian population repudiated such actions. Never going to happen though, is it. And are those living in Gaza also in agreement with being used as pawns (very much sacrificial ones too it seems) in a larger game, involving Arabs or Muslims as a whole, in a vast game of political and/or religious chess?
Unless this is the future - a civilian population claiming innocence and distancing themselves from any leadership which can then do at the same time the most heinous crimes. Most convenient.
I doubt that,remember the 6 day war:
50,000 troops
214,000 reserves
250[9]–300 combat aircraft[10]
800 tanks[11]
Total troops: 264,000
100,000 deployedEgypt: 240,000
Syria, Jordan, and Iraq: 307,000
957 combat aircraft
2,504 tanks[11]
Saudi Arabia: 20,000[4][2]
Lebanon: 2 combat aircraft[citation needed]
Total troops: 567,000
240,000 deployed
It's a feud fueled by religious fundamentalism.No idea what you are doubting .. and what the 6 day war have to do with IDF war crimes and crimes against humanity over this 70 year Blood Fued.
Can you give an example of the coercion?I'm of the opinion that the UN is often coerced by the OIC, any thoughts on that?
It's a feud fueled by religious fundamentalism.
It's not about land.
Look at the map of the Middle East. Borderless extensions of land where Arab nations live.
It's about the fundamentalists in those countries of the Gulf funding this holy war in order to undo a sovereign nation, because they dream of the Caliphate.
Those who dream of the Caliphate don't recognize the borders of the ME: those are straight lines made with the ruler by the British and the French.
And at least the Jordan River is a natural border, it could have been used to draw the map better, between Israelis and Arabs.
Agreed, which is why when posters use UN resolutions against Israel as evidence, I'm unmoved.
So it's about Jerusalem?Aside the religious fundamentalism on both sides -- which definitely provides some of the flame -- the Zionist movement was initially led by Atheists .. and its all about Land .. what is the Phrase "From Jerusalem to the Sea" or some such thing.
So it's about Jerusalem?
Well...The Turks stole Constantinople from the Greeks. The Greeks have forgiven them.
Because they are Christians. Christians believe in forgiveness.
And now Turkey and Greece are in good terms.
By the way, Greeks founded Byzantium in the VIII century BC. 2000 years of Greek history.
What about Cyprus?Because they are Christians. Christians believe in forgiveness.
And now Turkey and Greece are in good terms.
Cyprus is the demonstration that they can perfectly coexist in the same island.What about Cyprus?
You're pretending that there isn't an ongoing dispute: Cyprus problem - WikipediaCyprus is the demonstration that they can perfectly coexist in the same island.
Who said it about Jerusalem ? and what relevance does Bryzantium have to the ongoing War Crime - Crime against humanity - going on in the Occupied Territories for 70 years .. and the latest effort in "Ethnic Cleansing" .. in the most true sense of the word ..from both an Atheist and a religious perspective
Cyprus is in the EU. I do know what's happening there.You're pretending that there isn't an ongoing dispute: Cyprus problem - Wikipedia