Open Mind, please clarify something for me: What are we debating here? Are we debating this mangled, premise skipping, abortion of an argument:
open_mind said:
I've just seen your post now,and here's my VERY SIMPLE answer to the easiest question of all:
I gave u evidence that homosexuality is scientifically harmful and even fatal,thats enough to be against God's creation for human nature based on primitiveness
GOD FORBIDS ANYTHING THAT HARMS HUMAN BEINGS
i gave u evidence that homosexuality is scientifically harmful,and thats why God forbids it and thats why its against human nature created by God...
i can't be much clearer!
and believe me,i've just given a brief of the real effects of HS.
Or are we debating this, so far, unsupported claim:
Open Mind said:
note:i used the word turned because no man is born homosexual,as it is something against human nature created by GOD.
I know you're trying to get at something here. I know you're trying to give birth to a logical argument. I can just sense it. But, frankly, your labor doesn't seem to be going too well at this point. There seems some risk your argument is going to be stillborn. At anyrate, please clarify for me which formulation of your half-born argument we're debating.