mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Thats the teachings of my religion not a personal shortcoming.
But your religion is personal and a shortcoming to the rest of us. Don't you get that?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Thats the teachings of my religion not a personal shortcoming.
I think you've brought several examples of deviation in Christian doctrine. But that doesn't come close to claiming there are 40,000 deviations.There is no doubt that Christianity has to accomodate bleeding heart liberals who accept gays and minorities, through moderate interpretations, through conservatives, all the way to extremists like the KKK, a Christian organization. This weekend I was in southern missouri and I saw a church that is the Second Baptist Church. Second? It's usually First Baptist, or First Methodist, or First Whatever, but Second? That Christianity isn't a unified religion at all is problem for them claiming "truth" in any sense. The justification is that at the core of it all all Christians are saved. Yet even this is debated, as some Christians claim salvation comes through works, while others claim it is a guarantee once they accepted Jesus. Oddly this latter group usually say they have no moral obligation to others once they are saved. Wow, talk about missing everything Jesus taught. Catholicism was clever to make their system a pyramid hieracrchy as that eliminated any wandering sheep.
It is a deal breaker for the vast majority of people, thank goodness.Right, there's nothing like spiritual blackmail to realize the Bahai really believe in oneness. Seeing people completely absorbed in religious dogma is always a concern. It is interesting to watch the superficial kindness, yet over time we start to see the true darkness that lurks underneath. The fact that Bahai HAVE to accept bigotry as part of their ideology indicates a serious flaw in their being. That bigotry should be a deal breaker to any moral person.
Then it's a shortcoming of your religion, which means it's a shortcoming of the religion's adherents.Thats the teachings of my religion not a personal shortcoming.
No he doesn't, or he'd explain it.But your religion is personal and a shortcoming to the rest of us. Don't you get that?
One must look at the entire spectrum of believers and unbelievers to understand how faith affects people, and to evaluate which systems get the best results.
I understand that first sentence to mean one evaluates a religion by looking at its words. And the last sentence is typical of Abrahamic theism to blame the individual rather than failings of the religion to reach them. To me, the frequency of the failures is as relevant as the frequency of successes.
The parts of religions that support one another are the parts that mean nothing specific - the airy stuff called spiritual, which boils down to there is a god who says to be good and be nice. That's not religion except for throwing in the god part, which can be omitted without loss of meaning.
Critical thinking is what saved me from religion (and being an anti-vaxxer and falling for election hoax lies). Critical thinking is what led me to humanism. You consider yourself fortunate. I consider that skill - critical thinking - the most valuable cognitive skill one can acquire. It's what lets me see the words you cite in a way you do not, and why I do not value them.
Here's a classic Abrahamic sentiment regarding skepticism. It interprets independence from the shackles of Abrahamic religions and a moral failing akin to narcissism. It's a pretty simplistic and obviously self-serving sentiment. I've asked you before what you think your religion has to offer a humanist, and got no reply. Humanism has something to offer you. There is no bigotry there. Nobody is considered damaged or defective because a man said a god told him so.
Also, humanism offers reason and critical thought in place of faith, and the chance to live an authentic life as an autonomous moral agent in place of ancient received moral codes - you know, the part Abrahamists refer to as rebellion or arrogance or wanting supplant God with oneself - all code for did not submit. Your use of the word willful above is correct and illuminating. The exercise of free will is sin. Submission is virtue.
Is it surprising that belief systems that require obedience praise it as a virtue and independence of thought as a vice (sin)? No more so than that systems that can only be believed by faith declare faith a virtue and critical thought the devil trying to distract one. Humanism is the rejection of that, and it has improved the human condition with its fruits, which include science and the modern liberal democratic state with guaranteed individual rights. In the Middle Ages, people were subjects with few rights. Humanism converted them into autonomous citizens, and one can still hear kings and priests howling from the past, neither having much use for independent thinking people.
But other than that, like you say, critical thinking has been "utterly useless and worthless."
Then it's a shortcoming of your religion, which means it's a shortcoming of the religion's adherents.
sure, I can understand that. but just common sense, 40,000 is a huge number. I looked on wikipedia: List of Christian denominations - Wikipedia. It's a big list but 40,000 seems very very high.
Here's the source that the blog used for it's conclusion that 40,000 was misleading: The Facts and Stats on 33000 Denominations: World Christian Encyclopedia (2001, 2nd edition). If you read it ( it's not long ) I think you'll find it a credible counter proposal.
I respectfully request that you research this further before propagating misinformation about Christianity.
yes, the dispute is over the source of the definition of denomination used in the source: "
David B. Barrett, George T. Kurian, and Todd M. Johnson, World Christian Encyclopedia, 2nd
ed. (Oxford University Press, 2001"
The way they are determining denomination is based on country regardless of whether or not it's a multi-national denomination. Take a look at the second link I provided: The Facts and Stats on 33000 Denominations: World Christian Encyclopedia (2001, 2nd edition). Here the list of denominations is analyzed to see how many of the so-called denominations are actually different. That's how they ended up with a number closer to 300 rather than 40,000.
Thankfully, society is, and has been going in the opposite direction from the one that you desire.
We've realized that being gay isn't an "affliction." It's not a "fad," given that it's been around as long as humans (and other animals) have existed on the planet. That it's just a natural and normal variation in human sexuality. And it's found elsewhere in the animal kingdom.
We've realized (well, some of us) that gay people should have the same right to marry someone they love as anyone else in the world does.
But your religion is personal and a shortcoming to the rest of us. Don't you get that?
If you did accept that people see it differently, you wouldn't be on these forums promoting your faith. You might come to the forums for some other reason, but not to promote. Most folks here don't promote their own faith.That’s your view and I accept that you see it differently.
Just as long as they're not married or stay overnight in the same bedroom?Thats ok. I accept that you believe differently. No problems. I think gay people are good people. They are always welcome in my home.
Happy to hear that.Thats ok. I accept that you believe differently. No problems. I think gay people are good people. They are always welcome in my home.
So now non-Bahais are acting like adolescents. It's really too bad we don't all grow up and get with the Baha'i program, isn't it? How very condescending and divisive.I mean it’s approval. Adolescence admits extremes. Before homosexuality was outlawed now they’ve gone to the other extreme and are interfering with God’s laws and nature.
I believe that what the world will eventually settle on is that not to discriminate or harm a person with that orientation but that it’s not normal or natural and overturn gay marriage. I believe as humanity matures it will avoid both extremes and see homosexuality as an affliction which needs to be overcome. But we are still not there yet rebelling against God and His Messengers thinking we know better than God and if God does not bow down to our whims and desires then we say He doesn’t exist. Typical adolescent behaviour. Can’t get what one wants then rebel against mum and dad so to speak and kick up a fuss and tantrum.
If you did accept that people see it differently, you wouldn't be on these forums promoting your faith. You might come to the forums for some other reason, but not to promote. Most folks here don't promote their own faith.
Classic doublespeak. Aware of your shortcomings? Are you at all aware of the shortcoming of referring to homosexuality as a fad, when it was seen in ancient times, and has been around far far longer than your faith has. Not exactly being too aware, in my view.
So now non-Bahais are acting like adolescents. It's really too bad we don't all grow up and get with the Baha'i program, isn't it? How very condescending and divisive.
Right, there's nothing like spiritual blackmail to realize the Bahai really believe in oneness. Seeing people completely absorbed in religious dogma is always a concern. It is interesting to watch the superficial kindness, yet over time we start to see the true darkness that lurks underneath. The fact that Bahai HAVE to accept bigotry as part of their ideology indicates a serious flaw in their being. That bigotry should be a deal breaker to any moral person.
Glad you respect the local culture. Too bad our ancestors didn't have respect for indigenous peoples. I've google mapped Australia, and it looks like even longer more boring drives than here.