Unveiled Artist
Veteran Member
Most of what you write I agree with, the main exception is that they were either possessed by, or influenced by what their followers believe was a divine source. I share that belief and I also believe that this divine source is available to many, perhaps all, of us if we pursue it with sufficient devotion and dedication.
The path isn't that complicated but it is extremely difficult. I've found one way that works for me but it took me over a decade to master it and I'm not sure I would recommend it for others.
In my opinion what makes the messengers different from other mystics is that they were chosen by this source for a specific mission, Moses, Jesus, and Mohammad weren't exactly volunteers, each expressed doubts and a certain degree of reluctance.
The Buddha on the other hand sought enlightenment with an incredible intensity and failed to achieve it. Only after he gave up on his quest was his quest fulfilled and enlightenment was granted to him. I view that enlightenment to be from the same divine source as the others since it teaches the same basic spiritual lessons which is designed to free up the love that lives withingeach of us and not just for each other but for life in all it's diversities. I consider this to be the divine spark that motivates and activates us.
The only thing I disagree about this is the generalization that there is a divine source in everyone and that The Buddha's enlightenment somehow mirrors or is this divine source. Enlightenment is a fancy word for understanding rebirth. Rebirth is fancy for understanding kamma. Kamma is fancy for laws of cause and affect.
Life is a verb rather than a noun (person/place/thing). It is in constant motion from the energy, heat, and so forth to our emotions and personality some call spirit.
Enlightenment is the understanding of this. It is wisdom it isn't "compassion, love, and unity." That's the benefits of understanding.
In my opinion, there are no "great" beings. Once I make someone greater or lesser than me, it throws me off balance. It's being a hypocrite and that ego-thinking is what The Buddha spoke against.
Why does the divine spark have to be divine? What is keeping god-believers being one with everything rather than in submission to it?
Things like that I think about.