• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How can a Jew reject Jesus as the Messiah?

Skywalker

Well-Known Member

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Jesus being called Lord in 1 Corinthians 15:6 is a title of Jesus being God. Paul was talking about God the Father, and the Lord, God the Son.
No, the text explicitly says that there is ONE God, and that's the Father, and one Lord, who's someone else, namely Jesus. The distinction is unambiguous.
People use the term the Lord to refer to Jesus.
It was a common title, like sir in English,which is from French sieur, 'lord'. Or French monsieur, 'my lord'. Or German Herr, again 'Lord'. Or Latin 'dominus', 'master, lord'.
Jesus was talking to the Pharisees about polytheism being false doctrine.
Jesus wasn't denying being the Son of God when he said my Father.
The plurality within the Trinity had different knowledge about the second coming of Jesus.
Jesus was asking the ruler why he called him good if the term good has a lot of implications. He was actually implying that He was God.
The wills of the Father and the Son were in alignment because they were of the same essence.
The Father sent the Son implies submission within the Godhead, not that the Son isn't God.
Jesus said my God and your God because he was also in his humanity, and he was speaking on the same level as them.
That's just you wishing the words said what you want them to say, instead of what they clearly say.

It's a form of wilful illiteracy, and a damaging thing for anyone to do who's trying to find out what's true. Instead, it involves inventing stuff to bolster what one wants to believe, which is a bit sad, really.
 

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
No, the text explicitly says that there is ONE God, and that's the Father, and one Lord, who's someone else, namely Jesus. The distinction is unambiguous.
It was a common title, like sir in English,which is from French sieur, 'lord'. Or French monsieur, 'my lord'. Or German Herr, again 'Lord'. Or Latin 'dominus', 'master, lord'.

That's just you wishing the words said what you want them to say, instead of what they clearly say.

It's a form of wilful illiteracy, and a damaging thing for anyone to do who's trying to find out what's true. Instead, it involves inventing stuff to bolster what one wants to believe, which is a bit sad, really.

Why would an angel or a prophet or a teacher be called Lord? There is one God is a reference to the authority of God the Father over Jesus and the Holy Spirit.

I can give other interpretations the benefit of the doubt, but even at that it still shows that there are other just as equally likely possibilities for the meanings of those Bible verses about Jesus.
 

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Why would an angel or a prophet or a teacher be called Lord? There is one God is a reference to the authority of God the Father over Jesus and the Holy Spirit.
Learn some history, for a start. It's not as if I'm saying anything new. Nor are Paul's words ambiguous ─ on the one hand there's God, and on the other hand, there's Lord Jesus.
I can give other interpretations the benefit of the doubt.
There is no doubt. I gave you a sampling of the many quotes where the Jesuses of Paul, Mark, Matthew, Luke and John each deny they're God. There is not a single example of Jesus saying "I am God". If Jesus was nonetheless God then his entire ministry was one of lies and deceit ─ is that your claim?
 

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
Learn some history, for a start. It's not as if I'm saying anything new. Nor are Paul's words ambiguous ─ on the one hand there's God, and on the other hand, there's Lord Jesus.
There is no doubt. I gave you a sampling of the many quotes where the Jesuses of Paul, Mark, Matthew, Luke and John each deny they're God. There is not a single example of Jesus saying "I am God". If Jesus was nonetheless God then his entire ministry was one of lies and deceit ─ is that your claim?

Paul was talking about the submission of God the Son to God the Father, within the plurality in the Trinity.

If Jesus said I am God it would be vain and boastful and he would sound like the guy in Siberia who claimed to be Jesus. Sometimes when speaking the truth you have to be simple and subtle. Jesus not outright saying he was God is different from lies and deceit-it is being subtle.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
You keep citing to a website that is antisemitic. Why is that?
To answer as a former Evangelical, their views are harshly anti-Semitic. Of course they put on this facade of being pro-Israel and pro-Jew, but, as you've seen here, it's just not genuine as they also believe they completed your religion, they have the promised messiah, and that Jews are basically delusional for denying it.
But they'll won't accept their views are anti-semitic as that would mean they have a problem with gods people, amd Evangelicals are deathly afraid of deliberately going against god. Because (this is according to them) going against god is what the Jews do, and just loom at how god punished them throughout the Bible for their disobedience. I
n the more extreme forms that I learned this percieved punishment over disobedience extents to the Holocaust. Because they're Jews, and disobeying god is what the Jews do according to the Bible.
 

Redemptionsong

Well-Known Member
Why would the establishment of the Kingdom require the earthlings to accept or reject anything? The Kingdom was to be imposed, despite the Romans, despite the Jewish hierarchy, despite what the average citizen might think, and represent the triumph of Jesus' followers, surely?

To the best of my recollection the prayer "thy kingdom come" doesn't mention a plebiscite, or the concerns of the Olympian religions, the Zoroastrians, or the Hindus, or Buddhists, or followers of the Great Spirit or the Rainbow Serpent, does it?

The Kingdom of God is not imposed. God knew that his Son would be killed and rejected, but it was still necessary to make known the Anointed One, and for the faithful few to take the message to the wider world.

The nation is, I believe, given one last chance.
 

rosends

Well-Known Member
No prophet back then was named "God saves".
Joshua who succeeded Moses was, indeed, a prophet.

also 2 Kings 23:8 has a city prefect named Joshua
and Joshua the son of Yehotzadak the high priest, mentioned often in the books of Chaggai and Zechariah.
 

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
Joshua who succeeded Moses was, indeed, a prophet.

also 2 Kings 23:8 has a city prefect named Joshua
and Joshua the son of Yehotzadak the high priest, mentioned often in the books of Chaggai and Zechariah.

Joshua's name was not Yehoshua. The Bible describes the names of Jesus and Joshua with different words.
 

rosends

Well-Known Member
Joshua's name was not Yehoshua. The Bible describes the names of Jesus and Joshua with different words.
You are confused. Yehoshua is the Hebrew for the English name Joshua. The prophet who came after Moses was Yehoshua. The high priest, the son of Yehotzadak was Yehoshua. You can feel free to say that Jesus wasn't named Yehoshua if you want, but you can't change the name of people in the text.
 

RabbiO

הרב יונה בן זכריה
To answer as a former Evangelical, their views are harshly anti-Semitic. Of course they put on this facade of being pro-Israel and pro-Jew, but, as you've seen here, it's just not genuine as they also believe they completed your religion, they have the promised messiah, and that Jews are basically delusional for denying it......

In the case of the particular website the poster has been citing to, there are a slew of articles attacking the Talmud as evil, labeling Judaism as satanic, ripping Kabbalah, and treating Zionism with disgust. This goes far beyond the more common attitude of seeing Jews as spiritually blind, spiritually stupid, and spiritually ignorant.

To be fair, if one looks at the website one realizes it is a hate filled screed against Catholics, Muslims, Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, Hindus, Buddhists, and a whole slew of other things.
 
Last edited:

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
You are confused. Yehoshua is the Hebrew for the English name Joshua. The prophet who came after Moses was Yehoshua. The high priest, the son of Yehotzadak was Yehoshua. You can feel free to say that Jesus wasn't named Yehoshua if you want, but you can't change the name of people in the text.

Meaning the prophet Joshua in the book of Joshua, or the prophet like unto Moses? A Prophet Like Unto Moses
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
To be fair, if one looks at the website one realizes it is a hate filled screed against Catholics, Muslims, Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, Hindus, Buddhists, and a whole slew of other things.
I think that's the number one past time of Evangelicals. Everyone who isn't like them is wrong and going to hell. Especially other Christians. They spend a lot if time nitpicking why those other denominations are wrong and thus Jesus will cast them away from the Kingdom.
 

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Paul was talking about the submission of God the Son to God the Father, within the plurality in the Trinity.
No. He wasn't.

There is no Trinity mentioned anywhere in the NT. The Trinity doctrine wasn't invented till the 4th century.

Please stop making things up. (There's a rude expression for that which is perhaps more appropriate in the circumstances, but I'll refrain from using it.) And read and understand what the text actually says. In the real world it does NOT say whatever you want it to say.
If Jesus said I am God it would be vain and boastful and he would sound like the guy in Siberia who claimed to be Jesus.
So, you say, he was instead a relentless deceiver and liar throughout his mission on earth. An interesting view.

What else do you say he deceived everyone about?

And on the cross he said "Me, me, why have I forsaken me", right?
 
Top