I was going to say this but then I read that it doesn't seem as simple as that.also, the era of prophecy had ended 300 years earlier.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I was going to say this but then I read that it doesn't seem as simple as that.also, the era of prophecy had ended 300 years earlier.
Well, nothing is ever simple, especially as it relates to JudaismI was going to say this but then I read that it doesn't seem as simple as that.
If indeed he was the messiah (I know you disagree), then he was a prophet like into Moses, he was considered a prophet by the people of the time as well. I'm sure many of the prophets in the tanach were not considered prophets at the time, in fact it is almost a hallmark of a true prophet to be rejected by the peopleJesus was not a recognised prophet, nor did he present himself to be accounted as one.
Many false prophets were also considered prophets by unlearned and gullible people as well, when they wanted to believe better things than what the real prophets were telling them ('They say 'peace, peace' when there is no peace'!), such as those who said Israel would not be exiled to Bavel. A real prophet needs to be tested first and has to have a prediction come true.If indeed he was the messiah (I know you disagree), then he was a prophet like into Moses, he was considered a prophet by the people of the time as well. I'm sure many of the prophets in the tanach were not considered prophets at the time, in fact it is almost a hallmark of a true prophet to be rejected by the people
Do you happen to have any particular proof that the messiah is a prophet so that the logical conclusion you draw (if he was the messiah then he was a prophet) is substantiated?If indeed he was the messiah (I know you disagree), then he was a prophet like into Moses, he was considered a prophet by the people of the time as well. I'm sure many of the prophets in the tanach were not considered prophets at the time, in fact it is almost a hallmark of a true prophet to be rejected by the people
Yeshua wasn't saying peace, peace, in fact part of the reason many rejected him was because he taught that the kingdom would not be immediately restored to Israel. The he is presented in modern Christianity would definitely make him a false prophet, on the basis of Deu 13 alone, for example. They teach that he was leading people away from the commandments.Many false prophets were also considered prophets by unlearned and gullible people as well, when they wanted to believe better things than what the real prophets were telling them ('They say 'peace, peace' when there is no peace'!), such as those who said Israel would not be exiled to Bavel. A real prophet needs to be tested first and has to have a prediction come true.
I'm not saying he was saying peace, I was inserting an example of false prophecy that is given in the Tanakh to prove that lots of people did indeed follow false prophets and Jesus is no exception.Yeshua wasn't saying peace, peace, in fact part of the reason many rejected him was because he taught that the kingdom would not be immediately restored to Israel. The he is presented in modern Christianity would definitely make him a false prophet, on the basis of Deu 13 alone, for example. They teach that he was leading people away from the commandments.
Many (I don't know if all) of the messianic figures (Joseph, Moses David) were prophets to some extent.Do you happen to have any particular proof that the messiah is a prophet so that the logical conclusion you draw (if he was the messiah then he was a prophet) is substantiated?
Also, knowing how many prophets there were in the tanach, do you have any evidence that many were not considered prophets or that it was any sort of hallmark of a prophet to be rejected? Thanks.
But that doesn't establish any relationship as proof. There were plenty of prophets who were not messianic figures (and the 3 you list are not all "messianic" and those who are, aren't in the same way as each other). In fact, most actual "messianic" figures were NOT prophets.Many (I don't know if all) of the messianic figures (Joseph, Moses David) were prophets to some extent.
So reducing from "many" to 3 -- but were these three victimized because they "were not considered prophets at the time"? Or were they victimized because they were acknowledged as prophets but the people didn't like the content of their prophecy?Jeremiah was rejected, thrown on prison, threatened with death, as was Micaiah, Eliyah, , perhaps not most, but some.
He was sent to all of Israel, and especially to the exiled house of Israel to restore then to the covenant. Tell me, how could Israel (northern kingdom who was divorced) return to the covenant, as per the Torah, seeing she went after other gods?If Jesus were teaching people to follow the commandments, those people would be Orthodox Jews, not anything else. They would have no need for Jesus.
If you are referring to what I think you are, then this website answers your questionHe was sent to all of Israel, and especially to the exiled house of Israel to restore then to the covenant. Tell me, how could Israel (northern kingdom who was divorced) return to the covenant, as per the Torah, seeing she went after other gods?
Yeshua wad considered a prophet by many, hence the Pharisees hesitation to act against him ("because of the masses")So reducing from "many" to 3 -- but were these three victimized because they "were not considered prophets at the time"? Or were they victimized because they were acknowledged as prophets but the people didn't like the content of their prophecy?
G-d will bring them back. They were not 'divorced' forever, as Scripture clearly states:He was sent to all of Israel, and especially to the exiled house of Israel to restore then to the covenant. Tell me, how could Israel (northern kingdom who was divorced) return to the covenant, as per the Torah, seeing she went after other gods?
Odd that these "many" just happen to be a bunch of people who had no idea what prophecy looked or sounded like, considering it hadn't been around for several centuries...just sayin'.Yeshua wad considered a prophet by many,
Oh I absolutely agree that they were not divorced forever. I don't believe the NT seeks to exclude Jews in any way, it always has been and will be about Israel, Israel as a people is central to both the tanach and NT.G-d will bring them back. They were not 'divorced' forever, as Scripture clearly states:
Thus says the LORD,
Who gives the sun for light by day
And the fixed order of the moon and the stars for light by night,
Who stirs up the sea so that its waves roar;
The LORD of hosts is His name:
If this fixed order departs
From before Me,” declares the LORD,
“Then the offspring of Israel also will cease
From being a nation before Me forever.”
Thus says the LORD,
“If the heavens above can be measured
And the foundations of the earth searched out below,
Then I will also cast off all the offspring of Israel
For all that they have done,” declares the LORD.
And
Behold I will gather them from all the lands where I have driven them with My anger and with My wrath and with great fury, and I will restore them to this place and I will cause them to dwell safely.
And they shall be My people, and I will be their God.
So I'm confused about what your religion is.Oh I absolutely agree that they were not divorced forever. I don't believe the NT seeks to exclude Jews in any way, it always has been and will be about Israel, Israel as a people is central to both the tanach and NT.
So we have gone from many to 3 to one who wasn't considered a prophet by many and still isn't.Yeshua wad considered a prophet by many, hence the Pharisees hesitation to act against him ("because of the masses")
If you are referring to what I think you are, then this website answers your question
Did God Divorce Israel? What does Jeremiah Mean by the Promise of a "New Covenant"? | Outreach Judaism
Okay, so, I don't call myself a Christian because many of their teachings are heresy according to the tanach and also NT. I keep the Torah to the best of my ability, keep the Sabbath, eat biblically clean, keep the feasts(as week as you can outside Israel, in the dispersion), believe in circumcision as a sign of the covenant, wear tsitsiyot, etc, etc. There is not really a good label, my family and I just seek to walk in the commandments, we also believe in Yeshua.So I'm confused about what your religion is.
You realise the Torah is only for Jews. Are you a Jew?Okay, so, I don't call myself a Christian because many of their teachings are heresy according to the tanach and also NT. I keep the Torah to the best of my ability, keep the Sabbath, eat biblically clean, keep the feasts(as week as you can outside Israel, in the dispersion), believe in circumcision as a sign of the covenant, wear tsitsiyot, etc, etc. There is not really a good label, my family and I just seek to walk in the commandments, we also believe in Yeshua.
The Torah is not only for Jews, it is for Israel, and has always been open to those who would forsake their wickedness and idolatry and come to YHWH.You realise the Torah is only for Jews. Are you a Jew?
If you do these things, why do you need Jesus?