Alceste
Vagabond
I plead the 5th!
I’m not guilty for encouraging respectful debates.
You spelled "of" wrong.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I plead the 5th!
I’m not guilty for encouraging respectful debates.
Let's look at these "quotes:"
“I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig.” — Andrea Dworkin
First of all, if you look up this quote or try to find out where it's from, all you get is page after page of anti-feminist sites making reference to this passage, but not referencing which writing this is included. That being said, I can't find it. How do I actually even know she said it, let alone figure out the context?
That being said, since it's Dworkin, if this is a true quote, she was most like talking about pornography in that sense that women are portrayed this. The "I want to see..." is a proactive statement meant to show how this type of imagery is used against women not men. That would be first my assumption. But since I can't even find out which writing this quote is even from, I can't even examine it.
Is it a real world problem when feminism doesnt involve women, equal rights and the right to protest or speak out against oppression?
If feminism is a movement, then women don't need a man (or men) to hold their hand during protests. They are more than capable of protesting on their own accord.
Why would a feminist movement involve men?
No, somehow someone starting talking about misandry (or man-haters ... which is a stupid word) and the site it is about feminism does acknowledge that it exists with some people (women) who claim to be feminist.
I agree with the article and its just a pointless argument that takes away from the real issues which is why there is really nothing to talk about when it comes to the site.
DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This was several days ago before I even posted this thread as to how can a guy be a feminist.
Why would a feminist movement tell men to stay away?
How is "all men were dumb, dumb, dumb heads" equal rights? Is it because men called women that, and now they can do the same? If so, that's not equal rights, that's just childish.Because it has historical ties that involve women progressives for equal rights.
"All men were dumb, dumb, dumb heads".
I don't know how feminism applies to modern, everyday society and no one has taken the time to explain this to me.
It should involve everyone, because ultimately it is everyone's problem when the idea of individualism itself is being disrespected. It threatens democracy, it threatens the image of the "modern man" that we've restructured so carefully for the 21st Century, and it threatens our way of life in the West, including Capitalism, and hence our vision for the future.Is it a real world problem when feminism doesn’t involve women, equal rights and the right to protest or speak out against oppression?
If feminism is a movement, then women don't need a man (or men) to hold their hand during protests. They are more than capable of protesting on their own accord.
Why would a feminist movement involve men?
How is misandry a dumb word if you can pull from numerous resources that label men as pigs and brutes - specifically feminist social media? A former member on this forum posted a picture on FB about 'rape culture.' Me being foolish enough to take an interest in the discussion, saw just that: comments about all of men being a ruinous scourge.
I'm not even referring to post-relationship feelings because those issues are separate.
Muslim women choose to wear shapeless sacks over their head, just like some women choose to wear revealing clothing and a lot of flesh (possibly to impress their boss at work). The reason why we Muslims believe that women should wear a headscarf is because God said so- it's nothing to do with sexual urges (even though men have much greater need for sexual intimacy than women on average, also rape is usually done upon women rather than men- that is, if rape upon men is recognised at all).with the possible exception of Muslim men trying to justify why their uncontrollable sexual feelings require that women be stuck into a shapeless sack to protect themselves?
Muslim women choose to wear shapeless sacks over their head, just like some women choose to wear revealing clothing and a lot of flesh (possibly to impress their boss at work). The reason why we Muslims believe that women should wear a headscarf is because God said so- it's nothing to do with sexual urges (even though men have much greater need for sexual intimacy than women on average, also rape is usually done upon women rather than men- that is, if rape upon men is recognised at all).
Well that's a fact in some areas of the world. It doesn't matter how you spin it, in South Africa for example, rape is through the roof, it's out of control. So yes, a person could argue (successfully in the case of South Africa) that men simply can't control their sexual urges.I have seen Muslim men (women too) arguing that men can't control their sexual urges, and that is why women need to adhere to strict dress codes. I'm not arguing that it's the majority view, just noting that I've seen it, and that is the only place on RF I've seen any suggestion that all men are pigs and brutes.
Well that's a fact in some areas of the world. It doesn't matter how you spin it, in South Africa for example, rape is through the roof, it's out of control. So yes, a person could argue (successfully in the case of South Africa) that men simply can't control their sexual urges.
Perhaps they don't control it, perhaps they can't (in the sense that they have great difficulty controlling it and so don't bother). Perhaps it's a compulsive disorder in some men, I don't know. But what I do know is that rape is out of control in some areas.Doesn't follow. Men in south Africa perhaps don't control their sexual urges, but that doesn't mean they can't. Boys are not born violent. They learn it.
Perhaps they don't control it, perhaps they can't (in the sense that they have great difficulty controlling it and so don't bother). Perhaps it's a compulsive disorder in some men, I don't know. But what I do know is that rape is out of control in some areas.
Moreover, boys are not born sexually violent because their reproductive organs and the need to fulfill their desires don't really develop until after puberty begins. Basic biology.
Boys can't rape, they have no urge to rape because their bodies haven't developed to that extent. It's when their puberty hits when it matters, the sooner you understand this point the better.I don't mean sexually violent. I just mean violent. Rape is violence. It really doesn't have much to do with sexual desire as much as it is about wanting to hurt somebody and exert power over them. That is learned behavior. Boys are not born violent.
Well that's a fact in some areas of the world. It doesn't matter how you spin it, in South Africa for example, rape is through the roof, it's out of control. So yes, a person could argue (successfully in the case of South Africa) that men simply can't control their sexual urges.
Boys can't rape, they have no urge to rape because their bodies haven't developed to that extent. It's when their puberty hits when it matters, the sooner you understand this point the better.
I disagree. It isn't even necessary to have a penis to commit rape.Boys can't rape, they have no urge to rape because their bodies haven't developed to that extent. It's when their puberty hits when it matters, the sooner you understand this point the better.