Trailblazer
Veteran Member
That's right, and it should be ruled out, except in cases of infidelity, and I think Bible says that divorce is allowed, but only in those cases.If that is so, then divorce for any reason is ruled out.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's right, and it should be ruled out, except in cases of infidelity, and I think Bible says that divorce is allowed, but only in those cases.If that is so, then divorce for any reason is ruled out.
Oy, vey.If that is so, then divorce for any reason is ruled out.
Lucky for guys like David and his son Soloman... Infidelity was never an issue; they just married the new girl and became "one" flesh with that one too.Oy, vey.
They should continue even if there is infidelity by partners. What God has joined cannot be torn for any reason. And if divorce is allowed for some reason, why did God join them in the first place?That's right, and it should be ruled out, except in cases of infidelity, and I think Bible says that divorce is allowed, but only in those cases.
I agree that they shouldn't divorce even if there is adultery, but I didn't write the Bible.They should continue even if there is infidelity by partners. What God has joined cannot be torn for any reason. And if divorce is allowed for some reason, why did God join them in the first place?
Neither did any of the 12 apostles.I agree that they shouldn't divorce even if there is adultery, but I didn't write the Bible.
Matthew 19:9 NIRV
Here is what I tell you. Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery. A man may divorce his wife only if she has not been faithful to him.”
Oh yeah, NT was finally compiled in the 4th Century. And what Bahaollah said was modified by Abbas and Shoghi.I agree that they shouldn't divorce even if there is adultery, but I didn't write the Bible.
Matthew 19:9 NIRV
Here is what I tell you. Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery. A man may divorce his wife only if she has not been faithful to him.”
That looks like a different translation from what I am used to.I agree that they shouldn't divorce even if there is adultery, but I didn't write the Bible.
Matthew 19:9 NIRV
Here is what I tell you. Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery. A man may divorce his wife only if she has not been faithful to him.”
Lots of people quote Christian things from the NT and say that it is from the Bible. I looked up Biblical divorce laws in Judaism and this is a quote from one of the articles...If that is so, then divorce for any reason is ruled out.
When a man takes a wife and marries her, if she finds no favor in his eyes because of ervat davar (some fault or indecency) and he writes her a bill of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out of his house–and she marries another man, and the latter… writes her a bill of divorce… or dies–then her former husband cannot marry her again because she has been defiled… (Deuteronomy 24:1-4
My point is that a savior doesn’t need a particular something to save you from.Well the obvious answer is potholes, painted lines. Road signs. But I suspect you are trying to make some sort of point that is too subtle for me.
Is that like when companies change names to get out of paying their bills?Then the point is wrong.
There was a complete sacrifice because Jesus was fully human and He died…period. As the scriptures state He died the for sins of human beings, so He had to be human and die a human death.
He came back to life because He is also fully God. Because He is fully God, He alone could pay for the sins of the world and provide new, eternal life.
Patience or negligence?Contrary to your faulty perspective, history simply shows that God is very patient with humanity, giving opportunity after opportunity for change and repentance from doing wrong.
And yet the various laws in the Bible don’t ALL have the death penalty.For the wages of sin is death
Huh? Isn't that like calling someone a chef in a world where food never existed?My point is that a savior doesn’t need a particular something to save you from.
Baha'u'llah did not say that adultery is grounds for a divorce. The only legitimate grounds for a divorce is if there is an aversion for each other.Oh yeah, NT was finally compiled in the 4th Century. And what Bahaollah said was modified by Abbas and Shoghi.
Nothing about adultery by men in Bible and what a woman could do in that case? What did the latest manifestation of Allah say about that?
It is true that religions are very much tied in with the times and culture of the people since Messengers of God reveal what is in accordance with the necessities of the times.These types of laws and things are part of the reason why I don't believe in the Baha'i concept of progressive revelation. Some religious laws are regressive and aren't meant to be the law for all people, that is replacing the social laws of all the previous religions but are very much tied in with the times and culture of the people. And I think it was the religious leaders of those people that invented those laws... not some invisible God. But I also believe that the law carried much more weight by attributing it to their God.
No.Is that like when companies change names to get out of paying their bills?
Patience. If not, you, I, or no one would have any hope.Patience or negligence?
So, the scriptures are not referring to the temporal, but the eternal wages of sin.And yet the various laws in the Bible don’t ALL have the death penalty.
Too many things go wrong to consider Yahweh a competent creator.One cannot learn very much of the incredible nature of the universe, from the beautiful simplicity of the atomic structure of the elements to the incomprehensible complexity of a living cell with ten thousand chemical reactions going on at once in perfect balance with one another, without realizing that it couldn’t have happened by chance.”