firedragon
Veteran Member
Haha. Nope. It applies to both. If one is making a claim both metaphysical or as an agent both fail in the case of the future.You are confusing epistemic moral consequentialism with ontological moral consequentialism
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Haha. Nope. It applies to both. If one is making a claim both metaphysical or as an agent both fail in the case of the future.You are confusing epistemic moral consequentialism with ontological moral consequentialism
The Bible is indeed a Testament of what Jesus's offered from Allah. It is indeed a sure spiritual guide.How do you know that for sure? Thus, you believe the Bible is God's word!!
Sorry .. but there is no evidence to suggest Paul believed in the Physical Resurrection .. all the evidence suggesting he believed in a spiritual resurrection and Paul knows nothing about Zombie Jesus wandering around... Your claim is unsupported grasping at straws and strawman fallacy.Peter, John, James the brother of Jesus, you mean? Paul the first Christian writer, who met and spoke with those apostles?
You (and others) like to muddy the water with lots of words and smoke and mirrors about the Jerusalem church. The physical resurrection of Christ was foundational to Christianity from the beginning. Of course Paul believed the physical resurrection. I don't know where you get that he did not.
Paul died around 63AD and was foundational, not incidental to the early church.
I'm not saying anyone has to believe the gospel of Mark. But it cannot be employed to dismiss the physical resurrection as you have tried to. The gospel of Mark clearly leads from Jesus's foretelling his crucifixion and resurrection, to the events and the words of the angel at the empty tomb to Mary Magdalene. The gospel of Mark does not simply end with the empty tomb and the flight of the wonen as you earlier tried earlier to portray, until I called you on it.
You are simply claiming it fails without showing why.Haha. Nope. It applies to both. If one is making a claim both metaphysical or as an agent both fail in the case of the future.
I believe whatever is confirmed by God’s Manifestations. For example. Nowhere in the Bible is the trinity mention by Christ. And nowhere does He state that He is the physical Son of God yet a vast majority of Christians believe that Jesus is God in the flesh and in the trinity.How do you know that for sure? Thus, you believe the Bible is God's word!!
Yeah and Muslims failed to turn to Baha'u'llah and the Kitab-i-Iqan/Kitab-i-Aqdas and so remain deprived of divine guidance, oh and Baha'i allegedly see all humans as equal and are allegedly humble but contrary to this claim those who failed to turn to the next "Manifestation of God" whether Jew, Christian or Muslim are all deprived of divine guidance.But Christians failed to turn to Prophet Muhammad and the Quran so remain deprived of Divine guidance.
Paul wrote 1 Corinthians around 53/4 CESorry .. but there is no evidence to suggest Paul believed in the Physical Resurrection .. all the evidence suggesting he believed in a spiritual resurrection and Paul knows nothing about Zombie Jesus wandering around... Your claim is unsupported grasping at straws and strawman fallacy.
We do not hear acknowledgement of the "Smoking Gun" until the early part of the second century AD ..
That has been offered since the mid 1800's, starting with the Message of the Bab, it is not new and has also been offered many times here on RF.Yeah and Muslims failed to turn to Baha'u'llah and the Kitab-i-Iqan/Kitab-i-Aqdas and so remain deprived of divine guidance, oh and Baha'i allegedly see all humans as equal and are allegedly humble but contrary to this claim those who failed to turn to the next "Manifestation of God" whether Jew, Christian or Muslim are all deprived of divine guidance.
Thank you for finally coming clean about Baha'i teachings in my view.
The fact that you have not does not mean others have not. It's just demonstrably true that numerous people have existed and exist today who have a strong and unmistakable ability to powerfully affect people whom they meet leading to creating blindly loyal fans and followers or adherents. Some of them are good, some neutral, some evil. Because of this, this ability or "charisma" cannot be said to be correlated with spiritual attainment. Though spiritual leaders having such charisma will become more popular and successful, just as popstars or politicians or con-artists with same ability will also be that way.That is OK. You just happen to be an inexperienced traveler. I have not felt anything like this with any popstar or politician or your kind of heroes.
To be more specific, I have had this feeling with exactly four people in my life - Sathya Saj Baba, Ganapathi Sachchidananda Swami, Shri Madhusudhan Sai and a fourth person who is not so well known. Two of these are still alive, so you can test it out, but I am not sure you will feel anything, The gathering with the person should not be in a noisy, boisterous atmosphere which they often are.
The feeling with the first person (Saibaba) and last person was really very strong - enough to put you in a slight trance. With the other two not as much - so you can actually tell the spiritual stature of the person by the strength of the feeling. I also have not felt this with other well know Gurus like Mata Amritananda Mai or Shri Shri Ravi Shankar whom I have also met.
I hope one day you will get the same experience, but you have to try to meet such people. They will not come to you.
If the path produces results that are promised, then the path is true and the propounder of the path gave a teaching that is true.When Jesus walked upon the earth He was surrounded by disciples who were fishermen mostly and couldn’t read or write. So how did they know He was the Lord?
Same with most religions. The followers weren’t really educated but they seemed to be able to recognise the truth.
How is this so and why were the priests and educated class unable to recognise the Prophet?
What criteria, not using any scripture would determine whether a prophet is true or not?
This is a thread mainly for religionists to share, explain and explore how the first disciples of their religion came to know the truth without having knowledge of scriptures or even no basic human learning. It is said the disciples of Jesus couldn’t count to 10.
Nope. I said "why".You are simply claiming it fails without showing why.
How are Christians relevant? I am asking you from your own perspective.I believe whatever is confirmed by God’s Manifestations. For example. Nowhere in the Bible is the trinity mention by Christ. And nowhere does He state that He is the physical Son of God yet a vast majority of Christians believe that Jesus is God in the flesh and in the trinity.
I believe it contains the Word of God as in Moses and Jesus were Prophets of God and there were minor prophets too.How are Christians relevant? I am asking you from your own perspective.
Do you believe the Bible is God's word? If so, why?
They use mindfulness today to help heal those with mental trauma so the Buddha’s teaching on mindfulness and meditation are very much alive and of great value to us all.If the path produces results that are promised, then the path is true and the propounder of the path gave a teaching that is true.
For example the followers of Buddha attained the bodhi state marked by cessation of suffering by following his methods. So the method works. Even today it works, as many monks will attest.
Similarly the path of yoga yields the results that are promised to its practitioners etc etc.
About Abrahamic religions, I do not know. Maybe presence of the Holy Spirit is felt?
Actually, I never personally met Sathya Sai Baba. I was at a gathering of a few thousand people and he just walked between the crowd of people without speaking a word, at a distance of at least a couple of hundred yards from me. He is not exactly a 'beauty' to look at and he did not look at me either. So, I am not sure what 'charisma' was involved. Clearly you have not had the experience of being in the presence of such a person.... numerous people have existed and exist today who have a strong and unmistakable ability to powerfully affect people whom they meet leading to creating blindly loyal fans and followers or adherents. Some of them are good, some neutral, some evil. Because of this, this ability or "charisma" cannot be said to be correlated with spiritual attainment. Though spiritual leaders having such charisma will become more popular and successful,
So how do you pick the "word of God" out of the "other"? What's your criteria?I believe it contains the Word of God as in Moses and Jesus were Prophets of God and there were minor prophets too.
But there are some chapters with author unknown so we do not know about these unless the Quran or Baha’u’llah refer to them.
But, for Baha'is, it's not literally true... just symbolically true. Plus, Baha'is can't be sure about the authenticity of a verse unless one of the Baha'i prophets quoted that verse.The Bible is indeed a Testament of what Jesus's offered from Allah. It is indeed a sure spiritual guide.
Abdul'baha put it this way
Inscription in the Old Bible
Written by 'Abdu'l-Bahá in Persian
THIS book is the Holy Book of God, of celestial Inspiration. It is the Bible of Salvation, the Noble Gospel. It is the mystery of the Kingdom and its light. It is the Divine Bounty, the sign of the guidance of God. 'Abdu'l-Bahá 'Abbás.
Regards Tony
So, is it true the it was Ishmael, and not Isaac taken to be sacrificed? Is it true that Jesus did not die on the cross? Did Jesus make some birds out of clay and they came to life? Did Mary give birth to Jesus under a date palm tree?I believe whatever is confirmed by God’s Manifestations. For example. Nowhere in the Bible is the trinity mention by Christ. And nowhere does He state that He is the physical Son of God yet a vast majority of Christians believe that Jesus is God in the flesh and in the trinity.
So how are we to know the truth? God sent down Muhammad and the Quran, and in the Book it is clearly stated that these are misconceptions. But Christians failed to turn to Prophet Muhammad and the Quran so remain deprived of Divine guidance.
How about when Bill Sears, a Baha'i Hand of Cause, quotes them and claims that they are a prophecy about the Bab or Baha'u'llah?I believe it contains the Word of God as in Moses and Jesus were Prophets of God and there were minor prophets too.
But there are some chapters with author unknown so we do not know about these unless the Quran or Baha’u’llah refer to them.