Runewolf1973
Materialism/Animism
With all do respect to Zenzero, I probably just misunderstood what he really meant by what he was saying. Sometimes that happens. I have no doubt he probably understands these things better than I do.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
interesting question, but to answer the question you first have to know what is life. i'll tell you
life has the texture of a dream. in life, all things are possible. feelings of ecstatic joy await for us, they have been prepared since way before into the past and so into the future.
elesam,
One of the problems you're having here is that you're debating entirely by naked assertion. In other words, you've offered nothing at all except your own say-so. You assert that H. habilus "has been proven to be a monkey", yet you fail to back this up with anything at all. Who "proved" it? How did they do it?
See...no one here is going to take your word as unquestioned gospel, especially when you tell us things that most people are pretty sure are wrong (and some of us know are wrong).
i really do need to use the scientists ames don't i. look i don't tell lies to no one, so if you think that i am making this u just so that i can be right and the rest wrong, no way, i would rather preffer the other way around, i'd hate to think that more older people than me are fooled by such things as evolution.
If you want to discuss science, you'd better be prepared to do some work. Here's a good place to start: What sort of characteristics would you expect to find in a human/ape transitional fossil? Try and be as specific as you can.
well i do not beleive evolution, but since you asked for it here goes; in order for me to beleive that they really existed, i would want to see this, a not so tall not so short creature, not fully up right waling nor walking with all fours, to have some human parts and some monkey parts and some inbetween the both, i won't say anymre, because this much canot be proven yet nor ever.
and heres a question in return. scientist beleive that humans and monkeys have the same ancestor because of the number of chromosomes, humans 46, monkeys (chimps) 48. you do accept this right.
Not according to the DNA testing.
And I never heard of a 6 foot 12 year old.
fantôme profane;1359969 said:I had given you the credit of having at least the basic intelligence to be able to discern sarcasm. Was I wrong about that?
Do you really think that Harun Yahya is actually the ultimate source for all things scientific?
I just thought that what you said was so incredible absurd that it must have come from him. Am I right?
Man is the only animal that can merge with the whole.
Why is it that evolution is so often criticised yet in response, when we ask for something better, we get "just because" or a silly fairytale.
Friend darknessend,
Mind is the root of dualities and those whose minds whose minds want to find differences rather than commonalities and wishes to criticize will always do so.
Evolution will not stop its work even if their mind does not accept it.
Those who are interested in TRUTH will carry on irrespective of anyone believing or not believing in it.
Love & rgds
Friend darknessend,
Mind is the root of dualities and those whose minds whose minds want to find differences rather than commonalities and wishes to criticize will always do so.
Evolution will not stop its work even if their mind does not accept it.
Those who are interested in TRUTH will carry on irrespective of anyone believing or not believing in it.
Love & rgds
The similarities go much deeper than just the number of chromosomes.and heres a question in return. scientist beleive that humans and monkeys have the same ancestor because of the number of chromosomes, humans 46, monkeys (chimps) 48. you do accept this right.
I have yet to hear anything like this, could you provide a link perhaps?Science is now saying there are two brain types occuring between possibly 20000 years and much less time apart. Possibly about 6000 years ago. Interesting!
what is a 'kind'?
The oxford concise dictionary states --Race, natural group, of animals, plants, etc., -- I some times just look in the dictionary, the bible is translated by educated people and the rendering would be precise I think and it would be independent of interpretation that would be left to the many religious groups.
I have yet to hear anything like this, could you provide a link perhaps?
wa:do
Friends,
Nothing is personal here at RF.
However, All posts should act as stimuli's for awakening.
The question to my mind is * Don't judge, be open, could there be some truth in it?*
Once again this is an individual journey to Nirvana.
All religions are ways.
There are many ways, all of them take to the same destination.
Truth /nirvana is reached only individually never as a group like death, each die on his own. Truth can be reached either by questioning and opening the mind layer by layer or through meditation. The former takes natural progression or evolutionary path whereas the latter makes it revolutionary and takes one there directly.
Truth is not what someone has written or said.
Truth is what you as an individual reach to.
On the whole must say once again that majority of Christians now accept the possibilities of evolution but do take the story of Adam & Eve as mythical but what about the followers of islam? where did we lose them?
Love & rgds