Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What do you mean, “How does the story…?”How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?
OK. It's not allegorical. I always figured itWhat do you mean, “How does the story…?”
You mean “how is the story compatible with science?”
First off, we have no idea what a perfect cell looks like, or how it performs. Apparently the telomeres at the end of our chromosomes would not shorten, as they do now; it seems that is what causes aging and eventually death.
But science has discovered there was a mtEve, and Y-chromosomal Adam.
Dating timeframe is off, but so is much in science currently.
It’s to be expected though: Jesus referred to Satan as “the Ruler / Prince of this world”. (John 16:11; see Rev.12:9) He has influenced religion, science, cultures and everything in between!
He doesn’t care what people believe; as long as it’s not accurate knowledge dispensed from, and regarding, Jesus’ Father, Jehovah.
Like the idea of A&E being allegorical… that completely nullifies the purpose behind Jesus’ sacrifice, that his perfect-life “ransom” sacrifice (Matthew 20:28) ‘buys back’ what Adam lost for us, which is perfect human life, what God intended for Adam & Eve.
Imperfection is a genetic condition; it is passed on, ie., an inherited condition. — Romans 5:11
The vast majority of mankind will eventually understand the reason for and value of Christ’s sacrifice, when they are brought back to life during the Resurrection (John 6:44; Acts 24:15), when God’s Kingdom will rule this Earth, accomplishing His Will. - Matthew 6:10; Daniel 2:44; Daniel 7:13,14.
At that time, accurate knowledge will abound, and we’ll discover among other things the extent twhich evolution has played in the diversification of species on Earth …probably quite a bit within their respective families.
Take care, my cousin.
Allegory typically portrays events as being real, such as in the Parable* of the Good Samarian and other parables. The early Church struggled with the debate as to whether it was "real" or symbolic, and the Church basically decided that it wasn't important as it's the "message" that counts.Like the idea of A&E being allegorical… that completely nullifies the purpose behind Jesus’ sacrifice, that his perfect-life “ransom” sacrifice (Matthew 20:28) ‘buys back’ what Adam lost for us, which is perfect human life, what God intended for Adam & Eve.
Imperfection is a genetic condition; it is passed on, ie., an inherited condition. — Romans 5:11
Seems to me ot matters, a lot if the " flood " wasAllegory typically portrays events as being real, such as in the Parable* of the Good Samarian and other parables. The early Church struggled with the debate as to whether it was "real" or symbolic, and the Church basically decided that it wasn't important as it's the "message" that counts.
* Please note that the word "parable" relates to the word "parallel", thus there's more than just one way to look at the narrative.
Whatever happened, happened; thus, the past is now in the past.Seems to me ot matters, a lot if the " flood " was
real or not.
Really? Why?Seems to me ot matters, a lot if the " flood " was
real or not.
For one, if it really happened, the geology is massivelyReally? Why?
I do realize that our fundies are immune toWhatever happened, happened; thus, the past is now in the past.
What does matter is how one may or may not use objective evidence to form hypotheses and possible conclusions.
Sorry, not following you. Geology shows that there was no flood. So what?For one, if it really happened, the geology is massively
wrong. So are the other hard sciences.
Seems like important news.
If I were Christian it would matter whether or not God was a psycho.
ME take it literally?Sorry, not following you. Geology shows that there was no flood. So what?
It's a STORY. Don't take it so literally. The point of the story is that God hates sin. That's true enough.
I don't think human beings have evolved that much in a few thousand years. I think that just as now, back then there were people who mistakenly took it literally, historically, and others who understood that it is a creative story.But I bet the ones who finally wrote it down
believed it was history.
Are agreeing or disagreeingI don't think human beings have evolved that much in a few thousand years. I think that just as now, back then there were people who mistakenly took it literally, historically, and others who understood that it is a creative story.
I didn’t know that.* Please note that the word "parable" relates to the word "parallel", thus there's more than just one way to look at the narrative.
That is simply inaccurate.If your suggestion is that there was a global flood, then it is incumbent on you to show adequate evidence. But none exists.
Sea levels rise and fall, and silt adds to the landmass and is subtracted from some others. Since this typically occurs over thousands of years during warm spells followed by cold spells, this can be and has been dated in general.Tell me, how did the possibly millions of animals get trapped within the vast Permafrost found throughout the Northern Hemisphere? (Not on top of it; within it?)
Of course he just made up theSea levels rise and fall, and silt adds to the landmass and is subtracted from some others. Since this typically occurs over thousands of years during warm spells followed by cold spells, this can be and has been dated in general.
The Flood Narrative, imo, was created as a form of storytelling to counter the earlier and much more widespread Babylonian Narrative, and the latter area often suffered from flooding in the Tigris/Euphrates Valley in the spring especially.
The art of storytelling was used extensively back in ancient Asia and elsewhere since most people were not literate, and often these stories were altered depending on what was happening. It is not an "enemy" to the Gospel in any way, as many Jewish sages, such as Maimonides, believed & taught the much of the early parts of Genesis were based on folklore, which obviously did include some historical facts within them as well.
The Chinese iconography argument along with all of your others has been refuted a thousand times. And you still cannot explain wh you think that God is a liar.That is simply inaccurate.
Tell me, how did the possibly millions of animals get trapped within the vast Permafrost found throughout the Northern Hemisphere? (Not on top of it; within it?)
No one has ever bothered to postulate a reasonable, natural explanation that has consensus for those discoveries… because a natural explanation doesn’t exist!
And there are numerous, unrelated cultures that share a global flood story. (One anthropologist claims it’s around a 1000.)
Coincidence?
How do you account for the ideal ratios, written down by Moses in Genesis 6, for the dimensions of the Ark? These ratios (30:5:3) were only discovered a few centuries ago, that they’re ideal for non-powered barges, and verified by physics studies a few years back. Apparently catching many by surprise.
Another coincidence?
And what about the ancient Chinese ideograph for ship?
I guess another coincidence.
There’s more.
Do you know why there are many celebrations of the dead held at apparently the same time of year that the Flood occurred? Halloween is one; the Mexican Day of the Dead is another.
(The Flood event has been embedded in the human psyche, and we don’t even remember why.)
@YoursTrue , have you read the “Flood evidences” thread posted a few years back? Here it is… hope you enjoy it; it should strengthen your faith:
https://www.religiousforums.com/threads/flood-evidences-—-revised.223411/
Take a basic course in Geology at your local junior college. Learn about things like plate tectonics, ice ages, fossil formation, etc. There is nothing supernatural in this happening. Indeed, what would be weird is if we DIDN'T find animals within the permafrost.Tell me, how did the possibly millions of animals get trapped within the vast Permafrost found throughout the Northern Hemisphere? (Not on top of it; within it?)