Man of Faith
Well-Known Member
You won't accept common descent because it wasn't seen by anyone. So why exactly do you accept creation?
By faith.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You won't accept common descent because it wasn't seen by anyone. So why exactly do you accept creation?
It's like knowing a car wreck is about to happen, but there's nothing you can do about it.
If I'm ever on trial for a crime that had no eye witnesses, I want MoF on the jury.
"No one saw it happen? Oh well then, no one can ever say it happened or that Jose Fly did it. Not guilty!"
LOL This is going to be fun. Gabe is willing to show me how science took him to evolution. How the scientific method took him to the conclusion of common descent of all life forms and how chimps are cousins to humans. This is going to be real science to with the scientific method and all that.
Yup, because under the scientific method, there's no requirement of "You have to see something happen before you can say it did".If Gabe is the prosecutor and pulls out his scientific method chart you might be in trouble.
No you're not. For whatever reason, you seem to carry around this cartoonish version of the SM that says "You can't say something happened unless you see it happen".I am willing to follow the scientific method.
Be careful MoF, your sources don't have the best track record when it comes to scientific topics.I will look at data, but I won't accept anything as fact unless I go to my own sources.
If you ladies are done bickering I am waiting for Man of Faiths questions regarding this entire issue, I hope he did not forget about it / Ignored it.
I can not tell you how excited I am, I am so thrilled to get a chance to explain what you are confused about and really eager to show you the real world, I hope you are open to accept facts and reality and truly are as excited as I am to propagate
I think he already attempted to ask it. Which is, by using the scientific method how can you say evolution happened? or something along those lines.
MoF said:
That will work. I am short on time also, but now that we have the scientific method down, I will work on my next question. Hopefully this scientific method will take us to some facts.
What we see and the evidence shows is creatures evolve or adapt within specific boundaries. There is no such thing as a dogcat or an apehuman.
What is wrong with getting information from people that you trust and have the same worldview? I'm sure everyone does it. Unless you personally duplicate every experiment in the world and inspect every fossil yourself.
You put up a drawing of the ToE, showing how mankind evolved from something other than mankind. Preposterous. That has never been seen and is imagination. Whenever we find evidence of man living in the past we always find evidence of them doing things, like building pyramids that we cannot duplicate. How were they that smart we ask. It's because they were intelligent just like us, there is no evidence they evolved from animals.
So.... Am I to assume that he left even if he told me that he would answer?
I mean... Hello? It is sunday here... ?
Sorry I had a busy weekend. Lightening struck near my home, when I got home on Friday the electricity was out, then found out the heat was out. Then of course on Sunday I was busy worshiping God. Let me try to remember where the conversation left off.