Sapiens
Polymathematician
Your contributions are not valuable enough to warrant consideration ... welcome to the land of the blocked.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Humans did NOT evolve from the common ancestor of Apes
- Thread starter Aman777
- Start date
Ouroboros
Coincidentia oppositorum
Dear Sapiens, Picture me standing on the SeaShore waving a fond farewell to one more Evol who is sent fleeing into the darkness by God's Holy Word. God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
Took you long enough.
Dear Ouroboros, Be nice. It's the SAME with all uninformed Evols who can't bamboozle adults like they do little children. When you show them their errors, they run off screaming and waving their arms, into the night. Have pity for these poor souls for their future is not good. So be nice to Sapiens, for his is NOT the same Fate as that of an innocent animal, no matter what he thinks. God Bless you and Sapiens too.
In Love,
Aman
Sonofason
Well-Known Member
"Did Modern Humans Travel Out of Africa Via Arabia?"
I don't know. Did Modern Humans Travel into Africa Via Arabia?
How is it that you think you know the direction these supposed early humans were migrating when they deposited their remains?
Human beings have been migrating on this planet since they arrived on this planet.
Keep digging.
Sonofason
Well-Known Member
Um yes, they have. Human beings have been migrating back and forth on this planet for as long as human beings have existed. Show me contrary evidence.
The fact is, the evidence you think you submitted to support your own argument actually supports my argument.
Now show some real evidence please.
McBell
Unbound
Bull ****.
You added all the crap in the parenthesis.
So it is, in fact, not the false accusation you claim it to be.
Your blatant dishonesty is revolting.
Your claiming your deity condones your blatant dishonesty makes me want absolutely nothing to do with it.
You have been refuted with damn near every post in this thread that is not yours.
Your inability to understand that fact is most revealing.
McBell
Unbound
*climbs up onto pontoon boat*
*wonders if three life jackets will be enough to save him from the bull *****
The Neo Nerd
Well-Known Member
Where does it say this?
Thief
Rogue Theologian
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
He presented you with SEVEN scientific articles explaining and providing evidence for his position. Thus far, your only response is sticking your fingers in your ears.
Answer me this question: are chihuahuas dogs?
Sonofason
Well-Known Member
I personally did not see any evidence in any of the articles provided proving that human beings have a common ancestor with the apes. As I have said before, it is quite possible that human beings do have common ancestors with apes, but it appears to me, the evidences provided are not conclusive, and full of speculation and fluffed up hypotheses and rhetoric.
Some people believe that chihuahuas are a kind of wolf (lupus), that they do not belong in the species classification of dog (familiaris). Others believe that the chihuahua is a kind of dog. I personally don't know what they are exactly. We have a couple of chihuahuas in our home, and as I tell my wife, these creatures can hardly be considered dogs. Yet many people do.
I personally don't see that it matters much how you choose to classify any particular animal. They are what they are. Chihuahuas are Chihuahuas. They appear to be a kind of dog. So if you are determined to call them some kind of dog, I can accept that. If you'd like to call a Chihuahua a kind of wolf, I suppose I can accept that as well.
But you're going to have to do a little better if you want me to accept that human beings are descendants of apes. It's just going to require more evidence on your part.
It could very well be possible that evolution is true. I accept that possibility. It appears that it could be true. Let me assume for a moment that we are descendants of some kind of ape. So what? In what way is such knowledge supposed to affect me? Why should I care? Such information has absolutely no affect on the validity of the creation story as presented in the Book of Genesis.
Why should God be the respector of any man? He isnt.
Dirty Penguin
Master Of Ceremony
Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome : Article : Nature
Then here is a more detailed finding. The DNA that links the human primate with other ancestrial primates is published and peered reviewed by other scienticst in the respective fields. The evidence for it that makes it factual is because it's testable, repeatable and verifiable. In fact when multiple studies have been done in this area by a multitude of biologist and geneticist even more information is revealed that strengthens the link(s).
But common ancestry has been argued before and because of the gnome project those in the scientific community and others accept the facts as they are until new facts falsify them. So far the genetics stand strong. We know they stand strong because we use these testing techniques primarily in ancestry discovery. See the program (Finding Your Roots).
Here's another astounding piece of evidence that shows the link...
[youtube]zi8FfMBYCkk[/youtube]
Ken Miller on Human Evolution - YouTube
Last edited:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aman777
This means that the prehistoric people, who were CREATED and brought forth from the water on the 5th Day, by Command of God, the Trinity, Gen 1:21 were
Dear Quaxotic, Notice that Gen 1:21 is bolded. Here is that verse:
Gen 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after Their kind, and every winged fowl after His kind: and God saw that it was good.
IF you could understand Genesis, this is what you would see, in context. God (Elohim-The invisible Spirit-the Trinity) created or (brought forth from things which do not appear Heb 11:3) EVERY LIVING CREATURE THAT MOVES (prehistoric man) from the water on the 5th Creative Day.
Remember that LORD God (YHWH/Jesus) had already "formed" man from the dust of the ground on the THIRD Day, Gen 2:4-7 which was some 10 Billion years, in man's time, BEFORE God (Elohim-the Trinity) created every other living creature from the water. Science has learned the SAME thing and has dated this event at beginning some 3.7 Billion years ago when the First life (bacteria) appeared on our Planet. Refute that Scientifically OR Scripturally. You will fail within both disciplines.
Science has misunderstood and sees God's Creation from the water, as "Natural".
BTW, This was BEFORE Eve was made from Adam's rib on the present 6th Day as Gen 2:22 shows...and it was BEFORE both Adam and Eve were "created in God's Image" or born again Spiritually, as Gen 1:27 and Gen 5:1-2 shows. God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
Originally Posted by Aman777
This means that the prehistoric people, who were CREATED and brought forth from the water on the 5th Day, by Command of God, the Trinity, Gen 1:21 were
Dear Quaxotic, Notice that Gen 1:21 is bolded. Here is that verse:
Gen 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after Their kind, and every winged fowl after His kind: and God saw that it was good.
IF you could understand Genesis, this is what you would see, in context. God (Elohim-The invisible Spirit-the Trinity) created or (brought forth from things which do not appear Heb 11:3) EVERY LIVING CREATURE THAT MOVES (prehistoric man) from the water on the 5th Creative Day.
Remember that LORD God (YHWH/Jesus) had already "formed" man from the dust of the ground on the THIRD Day, Gen 2:4-7 which was some 10 Billion years, in man's time, BEFORE God (Elohim-the Trinity) created every other living creature from the water. Science has learned the SAME thing and has dated this event at beginning some 3.7 Billion years ago when the First life (bacteria) appeared on our Planet. Refute that Scientifically OR Scripturally. You will fail within both disciplines.
Science has misunderstood and sees God's Creation from the water, as "Natural".
BTW, This was BEFORE Eve was made from Adam's rib on the present 6th Day as Gen 2:22 shows...and it was BEFORE both Adam and Eve were "created in God's Image" or born again Spiritually, as Gen 1:27 and Gen 5:1-2 shows. God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
Sonofason
Well-Known Member
What I see here is a man showing a human made drawing of elongated rectangles that appear to be shaded different colors, while claiming that these are genes. Please abstain from showing me man made drawings, and show me the actual genes. I will try to determine for myself if these supposed genes are actually fused together.
The evidence is that you share DNA from Africans, just like I do.
And for the record, dictionaries are not good sources for learning the intricacies of scientific terminology.
For example, this dictionary equates apes with monkeys, even though they are not the same thing at all.
Dictionaries list the definitions of terms based on their common usage, not necessarily on their proper usage.