It is no different from being offended by Watergate and deciding to ask whether people are Republicans.
Good analogy.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It is no different from being offended by Watergate and deciding to ask whether people are Republicans.
You think so?
I'd say 1 was clearly a facist adenga akin to Hilter's
And 4 - well see above post RE Hymen replacement.
Sharia law practically permits women to be murdered if they dishonor their family..... and women who are beaten by their husbands are not permitted a divorce.
Not on my turf thanks - we are a FREE society thanks!
1) Being actively pro the Islamification of the the World
2) Commits violent acts or makes anti-western speeches to incite hatred of Western ideas
3) Plots to kill non-believers, kills non-believers, thinks non-believres should be wiped out
4) Tries to instil Islamic/Sharia law wherever possible
WOW ... just wow!Anyone who attempts to convert or twart my beliefs, freedoms or introduce inhumane laws into my country is acting like a facist.
I know!
Again - not an laughing matter.
Anyone who attempts to convert or twart my beliefs, freedoms or introduce inhumane laws into my country is acting like a facist.
Evalgelism that involves the killing of innocent people has no place in the modern rational world. I don't care what people want to believe, just don't shove it in my face... try and suggest I'm less worthy than you, kill my countrymen in the name of your God or attempt to introduce fascists ideologies.
Did you know our NHS has to offer hymen replacement treatment to young Muslims girls at risk of being beaten or murdered by their family. My taxes are paying for this... and all because supposed "Modertate Muslims" live here.
Disgusting.
Aye, I think so. See:
1. This is a bit vague. What is being "actively in favor" of a cause exactly, and why is Islamification any less legitimate a goal than, say, economic freedom?
2. Does saying that some "western" party or another is ruining America qualify? If not, why?
3. Clearly reprehemsible, of course. Also very rare among Muslims, arguably more so than among other groups.
4. That is just another way of saying "accepts that Islamic/Sharia Law isn't always possible to implement".
Ah, now you edit. Cool
Still pretty full of bigotry. As if every muslim does these things.
The irony of speaking of your country as civilized, non-muslim brits being better then all muslim supremacist, free society, etc. Than you show you're too ignorant to realize the diversity of islam and its people. Good job.
Saying all muslims kill daugghters who dishonor them (nonislamic practice outlawed in just about every muslim majority country), spread hatred for nonbelievers, spread a message to kill nonbelievers, etc, is like saying all Brits are raging racist, xenophobic idiots, look at EDL. Its a nasty stereotype based on a small minority.
So we are taking as premises that:
- "Islamification" is inherently anti-freedom (for 1)
- Speeches that do not suggest murdering people don't qualify as hatred speeches (for 2)
- That solid majority of Muslims that do not see "wiping out" Kaffirs as something Islamic are somehow wrong or shouldn't be considered as decisive (for 3)
- To think that Sharia should be implemented is by definition wrong (regardless of how easily or reasonably one might turn out to be convinced otherwise) (for 4)
Is that correct?
:yes: that is what I think.
So it comes down to whether or not we should give in to hostile paranoia?
I don't want to speak on how Shia take taqiyyah, but Sunni muslims are only allowed to lie when our lives are in danger, and even than, most scholars say it is more honorable to not lie and die shaheed.The other problem is this:
You say most Muslims abhors the actions of extremists BUT, how do we know they are telling the truth?
"Are Muslims permitted to lie?
Muslim scholars teach that Muslims should generally be truthful to each other, unless the purpose of lying is to "smooth over differences."
There are two forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, taqiyya and kitman. These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause Islam - in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them. "
SOURCE: TheReligionofPeace - Islam: Taqiyya and Lying
This is getting seriously sick.When Muslims leaders stand up and say they abhor acts of terrorism - they could quite easily be lying in a way that no Christian leader could get away with.
I don't realise the diveristy of Islam, sorry. I'm trying, but everytime I think I can make my peace with your belief system I hear yet another horror story of what your culture does either to non-believers, or to its own women.
:yes: that is what I think.