• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

If Christ wasn't the messiah, what was he?

In the 1st century, there was only 1 church that was created by Jesus and the Apostles.
And now there are all different sects of that church teaching different things. A diffetent teaching fro the Greek scriptures would mean they arent part of Jesus' congregation.
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
Hi everyone, I'm Jewish, and I'm here to engage in a respectful and open discussion about the role of Jesus Christ. As someone who doesn't believe in Christ, I hold the perspective that both Christianity and Islam have been orchestrated by God to spread monotheism.

Recently, I had a thought-provoking discussion with a spokesman from a Christian institute on youtube, and it led me to ponder how difficult to discern Christ's true nature without understanding Hebrew.

Just for the sake of discussion, if Christ wasn't the Messiah, what was he?

I do apologize if anyone is offended, but I think we should have an open, respectful, and tolerant discussion about anything.
I look forward to hearing different perspectives and engaging in a thoughtful exchange of ideas.
The Urantia Book "rang true" to me from the first time I heard my dad read it out loud. We attended a Methodist church but dad was a closet reader of the UB.

As to why the Israelites rejected one of their own as either Messiah or Son of God, this explains the circumstances in part IMOP

JEWS AND GENTILES​

121:7.1 By the times of Jesus the Jews had arrived at a settled concept of their origin, history, and destiny. They had built up a rigid wall of separation between themselves and the gentile world; they looked upon all gentile ways with utter contempt. They worshiped the letter of the law and indulged a form of self-righteousness based upon the false pride of descent. They had formed preconceived notions regarding the promised Messiah, and most of these expectations envisaged a Messiah who would come as a part of their national and racial history. To the Hebrews of those days Jewish theology was irrevocably settled, forever fixed.

121:7.2 The teachings and practices of Jesus regarding tolerance and kindness ran counter to the long-standing attitude of the Jews toward other peoples whom they considered heathen. For generations the Jews had nourished an attitude toward the outside world which made it impossible for them to accept the Master's teachings about the spiritual brotherhood of man. They were unwilling to share Yahweh on equal terms with the gentiles and were likewise unwilling to accept as the Son of God one who taught such new and strange doctrines.

121:7.3 The scribes, the Pharisees, and the priesthood held the Jews in a terrible bondage of ritualism and legalism, a bondage far more real than that of the Roman political rule. The Jews of Jesus' time were not only held in subjugation to the law but were equally bound by the slavish demands of the traditions, which involved and invaded every domain of personal and social life. These minute regulations of conduct pursued and dominated every loyal Jew, and it is not strange that they promptly rejected one of their number who presumed to ignore their sacred traditions, and who dared to flout their long-honored regulations of social conduct. They could hardly regard with favor the teachings of one who did not hesitate to clash with dogmas which they regarded as having been ordained by Father Abraham himself. Moses had given them their law and they would not compromise. *

121:7.4 By the time of the first century after Christ the spoken interpretation of the law by the recognized teachers, the scribes, had become a higher authority than the written law itself. And all this made it easier for certain religious leaders of the Jews to array the people against the acceptance of a new gospel.

121:7.5 These circumstances rendered it impossible for the Jews to fulfill their divine destiny as messengers of the new gospel of religious freedom and spiritual liberty. They could not break the fetters of tradition. Jeremiah had told of the "law to be written in men's hearts," Ezekiel had spoken of a "new spirit to live in man's soul." and the Psalmist had prayed that God would "create a clean heart within and renew a right spirit." But when the Jewish religion of good works and slavery to law fell victim to the stagnation of traditionalistic inertia, the motion of religious evolution passed westward to the European peoples.

121:7.6 And so a different people were called upon to carry an advancing theology to the world, a system of teaching embodying the philosophy of the Greeks, the law of the Romans, the morality of the Hebrews, and the gospel of personality sanctity and spiritual liberty formulated by Paul and based on the teachings of Jesus.

121:7.7 Paul's cult of Christianity exhibited its morality as a Jewish birthmark. The Jews viewed history as the providence of God—Yahweh at work. The Greeks brought to the new teaching clearer concepts of the eternal life. Paul's doctrines were influenced in theology and philosophy not only by Jesus' teachings but also by Plato and Philo. In ethics he was inspired not only by Christ but also by the Stoics.

121:7.8 The gospel of Jesus, as it was embodied in Paul's cult of Antioch, Christianity, became blended with the following teachings:

1. The philosophic reasoning of the Greek proselytes to Judaism, including some of their concepts of the eternal life.
2. The appealing teachings of the prevailing mystery cults, especially the Mithraic doctrines of redemption, atonement, and salvation by the sacrifice made by some god.
3. The sturdy morality of the established Jewish religion.
121:7.12 The Mediterranean Roman Empire, the Parthian kingdom, and the adjacent peoples of Jesus' time all held crude and primitive ideas regarding the geography of the world, astronomy, health, and disease; and naturally they were amazed by the new and startling pronouncements of the carpenter of Nazareth. The ideas of spirit possession, good and bad, applied not merely to human beings, but every rock and tree was viewed by many as being spirit possessed. This was an enchanted age, and everybody believed in miracles as commonplace occurrences." UB 1955 no copyright.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
And now there are all different sects of that church teaching different things. A diffetent teaching fro the Greek scriptures would mean they arent part of Jesus' congregation.
OK, thanks for clarifying that you don't believe in Jesus' Two Commandments and what Jesus said about his Church that he said he would not abandon. You also ignore the fact that Jesus gave the Apostles and their successors the power to make some changes as the world would not always stay the same.
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
Teachings that arent truth arent teachings Jesus "would be with".

They aren't teachings that Jesus would agree with but Jesus promised to be with the Church to the end of the age. The Church, not just a Church that taught nothing but the truth.
Along the way the enemy would come an sow weeds but Jesus would remain with the Church even with the weeds there and destructive teachings that some would being in.
The Watch Tower Society has changed it's teachings over the years btw and no doubt you think Jesus has been with it from the beginning.
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
And yes, absolutely, we are to know them. Part of knowing someone is to know their name. Knowing someone is also not putting characteristics on them that arent true...Like Jesus is Yhwh.

Is it true that Jesus is good? If so then He is YHWH.
Is it true that Jesus is exactly like His Father? If so then He is YHWH because nobody is comparable to YHWH.
Knowledge is not important compared to love of course, if we love we know God and are His children.
 

rubi

Member
The virgin birth came from Pagan mythology. Jesus didn’t teach it and he was known as a normal person up until his public teaching at 30+ years old. Jesus was their first born and conceived the “natural way” between two married parents. The miracle of miracles was the Son of God becoming the person of Mary’s baby “at conception”.

Jesus also had siblings.
that is news
 
OK, thanks for clarifying that you don't believe in Jesus' Two Commandments and what Jesus said about his Church that he said he would not abandon. You also ignore the fact that Jesus gave the Apostles and their successors the power to make some changes as the world would not always stay the same.
There were more than 2 commandments. Those were the top 2. Dont put words in people's mouths or assume anything, it only makes you look foolish.

Jesus said he wouldnt abandom his followers. The churches only claimed to follow him while they werent- they abandoned Jesus.
 
There were more than 2 commandments. Those were the top 2. Dont put words in people's mouths or assume anything, it only makes you look foolish.

Jesus said he wouldnt abandom his followers. The churches only claimed to follow him while they werent- they abandoned Jesus.
Do ypu really thing Jesus would back false worship?
 
Is it true that Jesus is good? If so then He is YHWH.
Is it true that Jesus is exactly like His Father? If so then He is YHWH because nobody is comparable to YHWH.
Knowledge is not important compared to love of course, if we love we know God and are His children.
I get it. Jesus is your God. Even though he had a God?
Jesus taught his followers to pray "Our Father let your name be sanctified".
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
There were more than 2 commandments. Those were the top 2. Dont put words in people's mouths or assume anything, it only makes you look foolish.
I didn't put any words in your mouth, and it is not I who is being foolish here. You've clearly not studied any serious theology because you keep on making one mistake after another.

To put it another way, Matthew 7[3] Why do you look at the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye?
Jesus said he wouldnt abandom his followers. The churches only claimed to follow him while they werent- they abandoned Jesus.
Complete, unadulterated nonsense that turns Jesus into a liar by having him abandoning his promise.

So, maybe do some serious studying and also drop the childish arrogance, then maybe we can have a serious discussion.
Until then, ciao.
 
I didn't put any words in your mouth, and it is not I who is being foolish here. You've clearly not studied any serious theology because you keep on making one mistake after another.

To put it another way, Matthew 7[3] Why do you look at the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye?

Complete, unadulterated nonsense that turns Jesus into a liar by having him abandoning his promise.

So, maybe do some serious studying and also drop the childish arrogance, then maybe we can have a serious discussion.
Until then, ciao.
I clearly said they abandoned him- he didnt abandon them. But if you need to leave....
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
that is news
John 6:42

They said, “Isn’t this Jesus, the son of Joseph? We know his father and mother. How can he say, ‘I came down from heaven’?”

From birth the community knew Jesus as a regular person and they knew his parents. This conflicts with the addition of an unwed mother having an immaculate conception.
 
John 6:42

They said, “Isn’t this Jesus, the son of Joseph? We know his father and mother. How can he say, ‘I came down from heaven’?”

From birth the community knew Jesus as a regular person and they knew his parents. This conflicts with the addition of an unwed mother having an immaculate conception.
How does it conflict? Joseph didnt publicize that it wasnt his.
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
How does it conflict? Joseph didnt publicize that it wasnt his.
In that age a women suddenly impregnated by God would stand out! Mary would have never doubted or questioned her son when he began his public teaching.

Joseph, "hey Mary, who's baby is that?"

Mary, God got me pregnant.

Joseph. "oh of course, want to get married"?

Who did Jesus look like? God or Joseph???

Mark 3:20-22​

20 Then He came to a house in Capernaum, and a crowd formed again, so many people that Jesus and His disciples could not even eat a meal together. 21 When His own family heard this they went to take custody of Him; for they were saying, “He is out of His mind.”​

 
Last edited:

Brian2

Veteran Member
I get it. Jesus is your God. Even though he had a God?
Jesus taught his followers to pray "Our Father let your name be sanctified".

I don't believe that the pre human Jesus had a God. He had a Father but only had a God when He became a human. (see Psalm 22:10)
Jesus is not a servant in the house but a Son over the house.(Heb 3:6)
The pre human Jesus was not a servant. He was in the form of God, not an angel, and then took the form of a servant (Phil 2:7)
Yes we are to honor, respect and glorify God.
 
Top