rosends
Well-Known Member
I factually addressed ALL of them. Well, except having more than 1 wife, which some Jews still believe is acceptable. The cherem of Rabbeinu Gershon was not accepted by all communities. But you knew that...right?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If Devout Jews rule Israel: Should Shabbath breakers be killed?
- Thread starter Servant_of_the_One1
- Start date
rosends
Well-Known Member
GAWRSH you taught this at an "accredited" college? How quaint. The academic standards of that school must be quite low. I have only lived it, studied it, taught it and, well, lived it at 4 other accredited colleges. You know nothing of Judaism. I feel sad for your students, if you aren't just making that up also.
outhouse
Atheistically
Apologetic rhetoric is not credible. You teach theology, not credible history.
outhouse
Atheistically
Not most
We require honesty here
I told you to use credible sources, because I already know how you are.
Yet you fail to substantiate a single word you speak.
outhouse
Atheistically
Either do you. You are the minority.
Last edited:
rosends
Well-Known Member
Gads, I hope that your "academic" position didn't require a knowledge of English.
And, by the way, yes I do. Being in a numerical minority has no bearing on knowledge. In fact, being the minority that I am means that I am among the group that studies the religion most. So, try again.
outhouse
Atheistically
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manna
Exodus states that the Israelites consumed the manna for forty years
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exodus
The Exodus (from Greek ἔξοδος exodos, "going out") is the founding, or etiological, myth of Israel
So academia calls your manna myth. Rightfully so due the Canaanite origins of its people.
Exodus states that the Israelites consumed the manna for forty years
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exodus
The Exodus (from Greek ἔξοδος exodos, "going out") is the founding, or etiological, myth of Israel
So academia calls your manna myth. Rightfully so due the Canaanite origins of its people.
rosends
Well-Known Member
Actually, I teach neither and both. Sorry you don't understand.
rosends
Well-Known Member
So you are basing all your claims on an historical perspective of the origins of the biblical stories. That's great. Since they are all myth, you can't rightly claim anything about historical practice. Way to shoot yourself in the foot.
outhouse
Atheistically
rosends
Well-Known Member
You have exhibited no honesty here and you deign to accuse others? I find that funny. Thanks for the laughs.
rosends
Well-Known Member
Well, it is a start. I await the rest.
outhouse
Atheistically
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manna
Exodus states that the Israelites consumed the manna for forty years
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exodus
The Exodus (from Greek ἔξοδος exodos, "going out") is the founding, or etiological, myth of Israel
So academia calls your manna myth. Rightfully so due the Canaanite origins of its people.
You have sourced not a single word. We require honesty here. Source your statements
Exodus states that the Israelites consumed the manna for forty years
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exodus
The Exodus (from Greek ἔξοδος exodos, "going out") is the founding, or etiological, myth of Israel
So academia calls your manna myth. Rightfully so due the Canaanite origins of its people.
You have sourced not a single word. We require honesty here. Source your statements
rosends
Well-Known Member
You realize that if I sourced it, I would source it in biblical text and...um...Jewish thought which traces back 2000+ years, thus proving that Judaism has remained the underlying same religion. You can deny my sources, and deny the authority of the text. That is perfect. Then you have no basis for criticism about change.
rosends
Well-Known Member
Gee...you think that repeating the same error makes it less of an error? That's sad.
outhouse
Atheistically
Garbage, stop attributing words I factually never said. WE REQUIRE HONESTY HERE
outhouse
Atheistically
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manna
Exodus states that the Israelites consumed the manna for forty years
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exodus
The Exodus (from Greek ἔξοδος exodos, "going out") is the founding, or etiological, myth of Israel
So academia calls your manna myth. Rightfully so due the Canaanite origins of its people.
You have sourced not a single word. We require honesty here. Source your statements
Exodus states that the Israelites consumed the manna for forty years
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exodus
The Exodus (from Greek ἔξοδος exodos, "going out") is the founding, or etiological, myth of Israel
So academia calls your manna myth. Rightfully so due the Canaanite origins of its people.
You have sourced not a single word. We require honesty here. Source your statements
rosends
Well-Known Member
So which is it? A myth or fact? And how do you know this? And the rest of the text, is it myth or fact? And how do you know?