• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

If god knew.....

justwondering: "the first Humans did not behave as the creator intended them to behave is it really the creations fault?"

not in the case of the created beings having freewill, or choice. if the tree was not there god would be showing us only his choice/his own will. negating our free will.

is it your(parents) fault a disobediant child broke a rule? or was it the childs choice. Even though you laid the rule down the child freely choses to break it..
 
Last edited:

waitasec

Veteran Member
What do cult leaders usually lust after? Sex, wealth and influence.

Okay...
Sex...well, I'm not sure, but it is entirely possible for Jesus.
Wealth. That's pretty easy, seeing as Jesus had none. So that's a negative.
Influence. Jesus had influence, I don't disagree there. Whether he wanted that influence...I suppose it doesn't matter. What did he do with it? Gain wealth? No. Get into a position of power? No. So what then?

hope you don't mind me interjecting here...
i thought that this may be of interest to the both of you

FRONTLINE: from jesus to christ - the first christians: watch the full program online | PBS

it's called from "jesus to christ" and it explains the political climate of jesus' time...
it is long but if you're interested you should check it out...
 

waitasec

Veteran Member
justwondering: "the first Humans did not behave as the creator intended them to behave is it really the creations fault?"

not in the case of the created beings having freewill, or choice. if the tree was not there god would be showing us only his choice/his own will. negating our free will.

is it your(parents) fault a disobediant child broke a rule? or was it the childs choice. Even though you laid the rule down the child freely choses to break it..

the god in the bible set man up to fail. he had no knowledge that disobedience was evil, because he hadn't partaken as of yet and when he did...well then, there you go.
the god in the bible held adam/eve accountable for not UNDERSTANDING what evil meant. simple.
tell you what, why don't you put poison in a 2 yr olds crib, tell them not to eat the poison and walk away...a 2 yr old knows what NO means.

see the tree of knowledge of good and evil might as well been called
the tree of gibbily glop....because they were ignorant of the knowledge, not stupid. do you follow?
 
"Did we decide to create ourselves without the ability to understand what was right or wrong?"

we were created by god under his law... he said if you do wrong/eat the apple you will die. the tree was knowledge good and evil not right and wrong. tree= freewill. knowledge of good and evil gives you choice to do good or follow the temptation of evil.

Law = knowing what is wrong
breaking law has consequences...
the law/ command was don't eat thereof..
they broke the law...
 
waitasec: "the god in the bible set man up to fail."

he set us up to win or fail.... we just choose to fail.

waitasec: "he had no knowledge that disobedience was evil, because he hadn't partaken as of yet and when he did"

but he(adam) did know it was wrong by law. he also knew the consequences of breaking the law.
 

waitasec

Veteran Member
waitasec: "the god in the bible set man up to fail."

he set us up to win or fail.... we just choose to fail.

waitasec: "he had no knowledge that disobedience was evil, because he hadn't partaken as of yet and when he did"

but he(adam) did know it was wrong by law. he also knew the consequences of breaking the law.

how could he if he had no knowledge of good and evil?
do you think adam knew disobedience was evil before he ate the fruit?
 
"how could he if he had no knowledge of good and evil?
do you think adam knew disobedience was evil before he ate the fruit?"

because god said:
Gen 2:16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
Gen 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.


"do you think adam knew disobedience was evil before he ate the fruit?"


he knew it was wrong... his creator who is all knowing told him not to do it or else.

he knew it was wrong in the lawgivers judgement. no he did not know it was evil. he did when he had obtained knowledge of evil.
 
Gods commandment- dont eat= right from wrong

tree = knowledge of good and evil

making evil thngs the new law, with consequence to compensate for knowledge of evil. therefore having a just god we can be guilty to evil. by the law prohibiting evil deeds.
 

waitasec

Veteran Member
"how could he if he had no knowledge of good and evil?
do you think adam knew disobedience was evil before he ate the fruit?"

because god said:
Gen 2:16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
Gen 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.


"do you think adam knew disobedience was evil before he ate the fruit?"


he knew it was wrong... his creator who is all knowing told him not to do it or else.

he knew it was wrong in the lawgivers judgement. no he did not know it was evil. he did when he had obtained knowledge of evil.


this creation story fails only because it holds adam accountable for something he could not understand...

you KNOW what the word delicious means
but not until you eat a tasty treat will you UNDERSTAND what it means...
 

waitasec

Veteran Member
Gods commandment- dont eat= right from wrong

tree = knowledge of good and evil

making evil thngs the new law, with consequence to compensate for knowledge of evil. therefore having a just god we can be guilty to evil. by the law prohibiting evil deeds.

how was he supposed to understand evil meant wrong?
 

strikeviperMKII

Well-Known Member
Is it realistic? Is it within the realm of possibility, of course it is. The puppy could chose not to eat the steak. Is the possibility slim? Yes. But still, it could happen.

The fact is the puppy doesn't understand english. Much as Adam and Eve didn't understand the difference between right and wrong "before" eating the apple. Did we decide to create ourselves without the ability to understand what was right or wrong? Think about the implications of that and what that means. Before you respond.... Really.... Think about it...

The concepts of right and wrong did not exist before they ate the fruit. Adam and Eve created the concepts of right and wrong. God didn't. Do saying that they didn't know what was right and what was wrong is beside the point because the concepts didn't exist until Adam and Eve made them. That's the whole point.

Yeah exactly. God wouldn't of messed up. So he did throw the baseball. He knew fully well how we would respond to the surrounding environment and he had preplanned a punishment for us that is the equivalent of the US nuking the entire world for some guy named Bill killing an Eagle in Asia somewhere. This is rational to you? :clap
Preplanned the punishment...okay. Because the concepts of right and wrong did not exist before Adam and Eve made them, God didn't preplan the punishment. He wasn't waiting like a spider waiting for the fly to get stuck in the web. He judged Adam and Eve by their own standards, not his.
And no, it's not rational, but I don't see your point. You're comparing apples and oranges.

Choice comes from knowledge. We had no knowledge of what was right or wrong. God made the Earth, God made 2 brainless humans, God made the snake, God ran away, God created the tree, God created us with the ability to succomb to temptation, God created man with an inherent weakness to succomb to a womans desire. Yet because we were just there responding to our environment in the only way we knew how you think were at fault? Brainwashed much? Going to a meeting that tells you were in the wrong 1 to 2 times a week would imply you are in fact brainwashed and therefore unable to hold any logical conversation. Drop the Church and the Bible for 5 years, start thinking for yourself, make up your mind, then come talk to us.
'Yet because we were just there responding to our environment in the only way we knew how you think were at fault?'
At fault? What do you mean by that? All I mean is that we ate the fruit. We did the deed, no one else. But when asked, we blamed it on someone else. It was their fault. They made us do it. Now we blame God. Wow. We're really moving up in the ranks, eh?
You seem to be hanging this giant, foreboding storm cloud over claiming responsibility for something. Why?

Of course seeing as I am talking to a guy that believes in talking snakes and powerful apples, but thinks the Bible isn't really Gods word, makes your arguments pretty ignorable by both sides Christian and Atheist alike.
The Bible was written by man if you didn't know, so it's not God's word. I thought you knew that already...
Regardless, Do i believe in talking animals? If you show me one, sure I'll believe in them. Not until then. Powerful apples? I like apples. I think they taste good. I'm sure they have lots of good nutrients in them. But I'd never described them as 'powerful'.
As for your last sentence:
Jesus replied, "Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay his head."
Luke 9:58
 

javajo

Well-Known Member
I know when I have done wrong. And I have done plenty wrong. I just thank God for his provision for a sinner as terrible as myself. I believe Jesus is hope for the hopeless, of which I was one, but not anymore!
 
And no knowledge of good isn't evil/wrong :

But:

when you are created "good" and don't have knowledge of evil... you do not know if you are good or evil.
you don't know your "good" as opposed to evil without the knowledge of evil.

why?

Because there are no alternative categories(good/bad) before the knowledge of evil.
[one category- created state.]

add the knowledge of evil, you now know you know wether you are good, or you are evil.
[two categories.]
 
Last edited:

Dirty Penguin

Master Of Ceremony
I have never gotten anything but double talk and mental gymnastics in reply to my questioning god sending himself to earth as his son to save mankind from the inability to follow the rules that god set up knowing before he created Adam that man would not be able to follow the rules he was going to set up.

Seems to me that god purposely set man up to fail.

I like it. I have asked this before....:confused:
 

waitasec

Veteran Member
And no knowledge of good isn't evil/wrong :

But:

when you are created "good" and don't have knowledge of evil... you do not know if you are good or evil.
you don't know your "good" as opposed to evil without the knowledge of evil.

why?

Because there are no alternative categories(good/bad) before the knowledge of evil.
[one category- created state.]

add the knowledge of evil, you now know you know wether you are good, or you are evil.
[two categories.]

huh? :areyoucra
their was no knowledge...this we can agree on
so why hold adam accountable if he didn't UNDERSTAND disobedience was wrong/EVIL
the problem lies with free will, doesn't it?
god is powerless over our free will...it is our free will that is evil because god cannot dominate our free will.
 
"so why hold adam accountable if he didn't UNDERSTAND disobedience was wrong/EVIL"

i once got a ticket for spitting on the sidewalk when i was 16. not joking. i had no knowledge of the law. but adam did have knowledge of his command, and understood he would be accountable to god.

"god is powerless over our free will...it is our free will that is evil because god cannot dominate our free will."

he wants people to choose to serve him. not to be forced to do so. lovingly serving him instead of forceful dominance/enslaved....

Joh 4:24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.
 
Last edited:
mestimia: "Seems to me that god purposely set man up to fail."

how come all men dont fail. God offers in the form of a gift for free out of love a sacrifice and jesus to pay our penalty of disobedience. if you decline trusting in jesus, you decline grace= unmerited/undeserved favor, and choose to keep your fail on your behalf. and be judged by the perfect standard. If you do trust in jesus, you give God all of the glory for the favor, and are free.
 

waitasec

Veteran Member
"so why hold adam accountable if he didn't UNDERSTAND disobedience was wrong/EVIL"

i once got a ticket for spitting on the sidewalk when i was 16. not joking. i had no knowledge of the law. but adam did have knowledge of his command, and understood he would be accountable to god.

"god is powerless over our free will...it is our free will that is evil because god cannot dominate our free will."

he wants people to choose to serve him. not to be forced to do so. lovingly serving him instead of forceful dominance/enslaved....

Joh 4:24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

no, what happened to you happened to adam
like i said before, you might as well have called it the tree of gobbily goop because there was no knowledge...of what that meant...

it is irreconcilable and circular logic
how can one understand what wrong means without the knowledge of what evil means...

it's like telling the color blind not to eat the red apple
 
Last edited:
Top