Autodidact
Intentionally Blank
In what way is it the same?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If you take away religion, what arguments are there against homosexuality?
- Thread starter jarofthoughts
- Start date
MW0082
Jesus 4 Profit.... =)~
You're not right.....
linwood
Well-Known Member
I can think of a lot of them.
None that should be the basis for making it illegal though.
Nerthus
Wanderlust
Well yes, one can argue that and adult in love with a dog, or with a child (in a sexual way) is wrong and shouldn't be allowed - even domestic violence. But, I fail to see any argument in which one person loving another person can be considered wrong. And, no matter what line someone throws at me - it won't change my view.
Just like it won't change people's view of being so caught up in other peoples personal lives..
very interesting..can you explain more of this??ty
the only bigotry I see, is from you!!!!!!!!!!!!I see no hate or anything there.....the WHITE MAN is evil...that's all you people know!!!I don't even care about your race.....
WHERE'S the bigotry??????????..please show us??!!!!!!!
MW0082
Jesus 4 Profit.... =)~
Really..? Because that can easily be reversed..
I see many heterosexual couples, single parents who should not be raising childen. Now considering they can be with two loving same sex couples who could provide orphans and under privileged children with secure loving homes...
No, of course not. An extremist like you who can not see through the obvious wrong and down right childish views the bible has held. Ignorance may be bliss, but hatred is just wrong. Plus if you do believe in Jesus and God and anything you want to believe, guess what? It says only one true judge, and I am sure neither of you imbeciles are that one.....
That depends on a very specific point of view.
If we're playing the "infer the intent from the apparent design" game, then it seems to me that women were "[obviously] made" to often die in childbirth. Apparently, it seems that God intended there to be a large number of single fathers around; what's unreasonable about supposing that God might've hoped that some of them would share resources?
linwood
Well-Known Member
Not where I was going really.
This is more where I was going.
Not considered "wrong" so much as "not healthy".
However this is a discussion for an entirely different thread.
Autodidact
Intentionally Blank
Why not? I'm raising three of them, and it's going rather well.
jarofthoughts
Empirical Curmudgeon
The question: 'If you take away religion, what arguments are there against homosexuality?' was raised.
If you were one of my students I would fail you for not understanding the question. An opinion is not an argument.
From the Oxford Online Dictionary:
Argument: 'a reason or set of reasons given in support of an idea, action or theory'
Opinion: 'a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge'
Even my fifth graders know that...
Last edited:
jarofthoughts
Empirical Curmudgeon
You will have to support that argument somewhat.
Why were they not made to have/raise babies?
Because apparently it's not that obvious...
Nerthus
Wanderlust
This is more where I was going.
Not considered "wrong" so much as "not healthy".
However this is a discussion for an entirely different thread.
Can't see how it is unhealthy.
Also, isn't this the point of the thread? Arguments about homosexuality once you take out religion?
linwood
Well-Known Member
Yes but I`m not making an argument against homosexuality as there isn`t one.Not a secular argument anyway.
I`m making an argument against love.That would require a new thread.
Nerthus
Wanderlust
Yes but I`m not making an argument against homosexuality as there isn`t one.Not a secular argument anyway.
I`m making an argument against love.That would require a new thread.
Fair enough, I understand you now
Well, physically two men cannot "have" children, you you are sort of right about that (it is not an argument against homosexuality, though, unless you consider us humans as breeding machines, which is a view I cannot say I agree with). But I fail to see why that would make them worse parents
. I mean, take two women who has adopted a child and treat him or her with respect and love. Then compare that to an abusive hetrosexual couple. What makes a good parent is not the sex of the parents but how they treat their children.