Reggie Miller
Well-Known Member
Dodging is the typical response of ignorant proclaimers.par for the course.
You have found yourself.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Dodging is the typical response of ignorant proclaimers.par for the course.
Good for it. You may want to ask them what they found out, since it is such an importante matter for you.
Just for clarification, did you mean that Jesus travelling to India is the knowledge, or the belief that he did by a few people is the knowledge?
You have never bothered to look, obviously. See post #195. You do realize that it is the year 2017, right? 2017 years after what? Yes, the death of Christ. Certainly not the death of Buddha.
Actually, the Gregorian calendar dates back to Jesus' birth, not his death. Although actually it seems he was born in around 2 BCE by current reckoning, so the calendar has slipped a little. Also, there are other calendars which have their year zero as the year in which the Buddha attained enlightenment.
You seem to have no particular urge to actually back up anything you're saying. You just make statements, tell people go find the proof of it for themselves rather than providing it yourself and irritably dismiss all criticism as lies or ignorance. I don't think this is any kind of dialogue.
Deflecting again, I see. The "apocryphal gospels" have been thrown out as fakes.
Not fakes and not thrown out. In some Protestants they are grouped together as 'of secondary importance.' In others they are referred to as deuterocanonical, not part of the Hebrew Bible.
The latter. The Ahmediyyas hold the belief that Jesus had travelled to India after crucifixion and died there.
They are incompatible . . . or so the Christians say so
Hinduism - “Satanic to its core”
I believe it means abstain from drinking blood, particularly the life blood of the animal. I wouldn't make any idols even if Catholics do or anyone else.
Genesis 9:4 "But you must not eat meat that has its lifeblood still in it.
Most meat they let enough blood drain out that it wouldn't be considered having the lifeblood still in it. imo
acknowledgement of any "other god" is strictly prohibited because there is only one God. And He is a jealous God
That's completely illogical. If there is only one God, how can you acknowledge something that does not exist, and what should he be jealous of?
Your questions make no sense to the Bible believer if you believe in any other God but the One spoken of in the Bible. Refer to:
BibleGateway - : one God
They make an enormous amount of sense. None of those verses from the Old Testament prove there is only one God. The verse from Timothy is Paul's words, not God's, nor Jesus's if you believe Jesus is God. In my opinion, Paul made it all up as he went along.
Well thats new. Jesus preached message of Monotheism.....
Do these hindu monotheists have statues of hindu gods or supreme god?A huge number of Hindus are monotheist.
Do these hindu monotheists have statues of hindu gods or supreme god?