Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Kungfuzed said:What about creatures that can't feel pain like insects or worms or seafood?
Kungfuzed said:I know when I eat a salad, even if it's a huge bowl of it, an hour later I feel like I'm starving. If I were a vegetarian I'd probably have to eat a full meal every two hours. I've actually been considering giving it a try, only because I need to loose weight and my pet iguana is so slim and muscular from eating nothing but greens.
Radio Frequency X said:The videos simply don't make an impression on me. Have you ever seen the way a lion rips its prey apart? Or a bear? Or a bunch of Hyenas? Killing is savage. Getting food is savage. Vegetarians prefer killing plants because plants don't have "feelings". Its a well-intended choice I suppose, I just don't appreciate the difference.
Hema said:Hyuk hyuk. Cute story about the iguana. I also starve when I eat a salad. That's because it's easily digested (which is good though). There are other more filling things like whole wheat bread, rice and beans, stir-fried veggies/steamed veggies, mashed potatoes etc. If you still get hungry during the day you can eat fruit. Apparently, we're supposed to be eating about 5 serving of fruits per day. (which I don't do and my dad is always talking about it )
Do you drool at the sight of market gardens? No? Thought not.Hema said:Exactly!!! Our bodies are even designed differently. See my previous post.
In addition, predators such as lions naturally salivate when they see their prey walking by. We don't salivate when we say a live lamb walking by. Most of us will say, "Oh how cute!" If you give a little child an apple and a rabbit, the child will eat the apple and play with the rabbit. A lion has claws designed to rip an animal's flesh and fangs designed to tear apart the meat apart. Of course all the animals who feast on other animals eat the meat raw. Human's are the only species who kill the animals with weapons and must cook the meat before it is eaten. So what about prehistoric people? They could not have eaten meat before fire was discoverd. Unless they ate it raw. I don't think that there are many people who will salivate at the sight of raw bloody flesh. Unless you're a vampire of course.
Quoth The Raven said:Do you drool at the sight of market gardens? No? Thought not.
OK, let's rehash this particular thing AGAIN. People are biologically omnivores. We're not carnivores, nor are we herbivores. We're opportunistic feeders and will eat a little bit of everything. Including meat if we can get it.
Our intelligence and problem solving skills ensure we can get a lot of it. We don't need claws, we have tools. Just because modern man likes his meat medium rare with a mushroom sauce doesn't mean that no-one ever in the prehistory of the humanity and their near ancestors ate raw meat.
Have a look at what chimps eat. They'll even occasionally hunt and eat small animals, but other than that, insects constitute meat too. The modern diet is too heavily weighted in the direction of meat for the most part, but this whole business of how we're not biologically designed to eat meat is probably the most tedious part of the anti meat debate. It's tedious because it's tripe.
Don't eat meat for reasons of compassion or a moral choice...I'm all for that, I appluad it even, but don't try and back it with haphazard and misleading biology.
I have been into factory farms. I can tell you that if I was one of these animals shoved into overcrowded cages and pens I would not want to ever have been alive.Nordicßearskin said:I don't think it's quite as simple as that. After all, if no one ate meat then none of those animals killed would have ever existed in the first place, and I'm guessing that for at least some aspects of their lives most weren't experiencing undue suffering or anguish.
Of course. I can live with people eating meat if animals are humanely slaughtered. I don't particularly like it, but I'm not going to argue with someone trying to practice a bit of compassion.So it's a little more complex then meat eating = bad.
I think you'd have a different view if you'd ever seen chickens in cages so small they can't turn around. Chickens that become so agitated they peck at their neighbors given half a chance. Chickens with absolutely no protection from feces falling down from the cages above them. Chickens that stand on wire at an angle for so long that their feet become disfigured and warped.Indeed, under certain circumstances one could theoretically hold and maintain the argument that eating meat is in fact the more compassionate option, should the positive experiences outweigh the negative over the entirety of the average animal's life. (As, after all, the average animal in question would have experienced nothing had it not been destined to be killed for human consumption)
At first I was under the delusion when I first stopped eating meat that my actions resulted in no death ever. I know now that that's not the case. However, if given a choice between causing bugs to suffer and causing something with a complex nervous system to suffer, I'm gonna choose the bugs.JamesThePersian said:But do you think that the alternative doesn't involve death and suffering? You have the use of pesticides and fertilizers, the clearing of land for farming, draining of wetlands, loss of natural variance in the environment, meaning reductions of foodstuffs and habitats. Just because consuming only vegetables doesn't directly harm animals doesn't mean that it doesn't cause a great deal of harm indirectly. Of course you could advocate a return to hunter gatherer lifestyle, but then you'd pretty much have to eat meat. There really is no way, short of suicide, to avoid harming animals.
James
I hear you on the salads. Personally I can't stand them. :cover: I like to have something more substantial with my veggies than lettuce.Kungfuzed said:I know when I eat a salad, even if it's a huge bowl of it, an hour later I feel like I'm starving. If I were a vegetarian I'd probably have to eat a full meal every two hours. I've actually been considering giving it a try, only because I need to loose weight and my pet iguana is so slim and muscular from eating nothing but greens.
Fluffy said:Heya Maddllama,
The ability to eat meat is not indicative of a reliance on protein. Protein is required to produce DNA and so all living organisms are reliant on protein. Herbivores get their protein from the cell walls of plants which carnivores are unable to break down. Humans similarly lack the digestive systems necessary to access this source of protein and so, as you say, we are reliant on meat for protein. That does not make the conclusion "If we weren't meant to eat meat at all, then we wouldn't need protein for our bodies to function properly." valid.
Yes, we can get protein from sources other than meat and animal products, but it doesn't change the fact that humans are not herbivores. One can choose to only eat vegetables and grains, but that doesn't mean that humans are not biologically meant to eat meat.Hema said:We can get adequate protein from legumes and veggies. People think that they need a lot of protein but it's not so. Too much protein causes kidney stones, arthritis etc. Excess protein doesn't digest well and it rots thus forming uric acid (if I remember correctly). Even vegetarians suffer from these conditions because they wrongly assume that they are not getting enough protein and so they eat lots of peas and beans and end up with too much protein.